The neural correlates of intending not to do something

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 101, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 1913-1920

  Kühn, Simone ^a,b   Gevers, Wim ^b   Brass, Marcel ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COLOR PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); INTENTION; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 65949090724     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.90994.2008     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Botvinick MM, Braver TS, Barch DM, Carter CS, Cohen JD. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev 108: 624-652, 2001. (Pubitemid 33604139)
2. Botvinick MM, Cohen JD, Carter CS. Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends Cogn Sci 8: 539-546, 2004.
3. Bruin KJ, Wijers AA. Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: a comparative event-related potential study. Clin Neurophysiol 113: 1172-1182, 2002.
4. Bruin KJ, Wijers AA, van Staveren AS. Response priming in a go/nogo task: do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition? Clin Neurophysiol 112: 1660-1671, 2001. (Pubitemid 32763249)
5. Burle B, Vidal F, Bonnet M. Electroencephalographic nogo potentials in a no-movement context: the case of motor imagery in humans. Neurosci Lett 360: 77-80, 2004. (Pubitemid 38471992)
6. Cunnington R, Windischberger C, Robinson S, Moser E. The selection of intended actions and the observation of others' actions: a time-resolved fMRI study. Neuroimage 29: 1294-1302, 2006. (Pubitemid 43184192)
7. Delorme A, Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 134: 9-21, 2004. (Pubitemid 38224183)
8. Eimer M. Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a Go/Nogo task. Biol Psychol 35: 123-138, 1993. (Pubitemid 23131163)
9. Falkenstein M, Hoormann J, Hohnsbein J. ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychol (Amst) 101: 267-291, 1999.
10. Falkenstein M, Hoormann J, Hohnsbein J. Inhibition-related ERP components: variation with modality, age and time-on-task. J Psychophysiol 16: 167-175, 2002. (Pubitemid 35314864)
11. Fallgatter AJ, Strik WK. The NoGo-anteriorization as a neurophysiological standard-index for cognitive response control. Int J Psychophysiol 32: 233-238, 1999.
12. Filipovic SR, Jahanshahi M, Rothwell JC. Cortical potentials related to decision-making: comparison of two types of go/no-go decision. Neuroreport 10: 3583-3587, 1999.
13. Filipovic SR, Jahanshahi M, Rothwell JC. Cortical potentials related to the nogo decision. Exp Brain Res 132: 411-415, 2000. (Pubitemid 30330218)
14. Jodo E, Kayama Y. Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 82: 477-482, 1992.
15. Kenemans JL, Kok A, Smulders FT. Event-related potentials to conjunctions of spatial frequency and orientation as a function of stimulus parameters and response requirements. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 88: 51-63, 1993. (Pubitemid 23171522)
16. Kenemans JL, Smulders FT, Kok A. Selective processing of two-dimensional visual stimuli in young and old subjects: electrophysiological analysis. Psychophysiology 32: 108-120, 1995.
17. Kok A. Effects of degradation of visual stimulation on components of the event-related potential (ERP) in go/nogo reaction tasks. Biol Psychol 23: 21-38, 1986. (Pubitemid 17184871)
18. Kopp B, Mattler U, Goertz R, Rist F. N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 99: 19-27, 1996. (Pubitemid 26241834)
19. Makeig S, Westerfield M, Jung TP, Covington J, Townsend J, Sejnowski TJ, Courchesne E. Functionally independent components of the late positive event-related potential during visual spatial attention. J Neurosci 19: 2665-2680, 1999. (Pubitemid 29162415)
20. Müller VA, Brass M, Waszak F, Prinz W. The role of the preSMA and the rostral cingulate zone in internally selected actions. Neuroimage 37: 1354-1361, 2007. (Pubitemid 47385284)
21. Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, Cohen JD. Stimulus modality, perceptual overlap, and the go/no-go N2. Psychophysiology 41: 157-160, 2004. (Pubitemid 38209039)
22. Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, van den Wildenberg W, Ridderinkhof KR. Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 3: 17-26, 2003. (Pubitemid 37517032)
23. Oddy BW, Barry RJ, Johnstone SJ, Clarke AR. Removal of CNV effects from the N2 and P3 ERP components in a visual Go/NoGo task. J Psychophysiol 19: 24-34, 2005.
24. Potts GF. An ERP index of task relevance evaluation of visual stimuli. Brain Cogn 56: 5-13, 2004.
25. Potts GF, Patel SH, Azzam PN. Impact of instructed relevance on the visual ERP. Int J Psychophysiol 52: 197-209, 2004. (Pubitemid 38402068)
26. Potts GF, Tucker DM. Frontal evaluation and posterior representation in target detection. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 11: 147-156, 2001.
27. Salisbury DF, Griggs CB, Shenton ME, McCarley RW. The NoGo P300 "anteriorization" effect and response inhibition. Clin Neurophysiol 115: 1550-1558, 2004. (Pubitemid 38760301)
28. Salisbury DF, Rutherford B, Shenton ME, McCarley RW. Button-pressing affects P300 amplitude and scalp topography. Clin Neurophysiol 112: 1676-1684, 2001. (Pubitemid 32763251)
29. Simson R, Vaughan HG Jr, Ritter W. The scalp topography of potentials in auditory and visual Go/NoGo tasks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 43: 864-875, 1977. (Pubitemid 8237716)
30. Smith JL, Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition. Int J Psychophysiol 61: 121-133, 2006. (Pubitemid 43947284)
31. Smith JL, Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict. Clin Neurophysiol 118: 343-355, 2007.
32. Staude GH. Precise onset detection of human motor responses using a whitening filter and the log-likelihood-ratio test. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 48: 1292-1305, 2001. (Pubitemid 32988570)
33. Strik WK, Fallgatter AJ, Brandeis D, Pascual-Marqui RD. Three-dimensional tomography of event-related potentials during response inhibition: evidence for phasic frontal lobe activation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 108: 406-413, 1998. (Pubitemid 28335668)
34. van Eimeren T, Wolbers T, Munchau A, Buchel C, Weiller C, Siebner HR. Implementation of visuospatial cues in response selection. Neuroimage 29: 286-294, 2006. (Pubitemid 41828051)
35. van Strien JW. Classificatie van links- en rechtshandige proefpersonen (Classification of left- and right-handed subjects). Ned Tijdsch Psychol Haar Grensgeb 47: 88-92, 1992.