Agent and instrument in judgements of ritual efficacy

Journal of Cognition and Culture

Volumn 6, Issue 3-4, 2006, Pages 466-482

  Sørensen, Jesper ^b   Liénard, Pierre ^a   Feeny, Chelsea ^b  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 65849353393     PISSN: 15677095     EISSN: 15685373     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. ATRAN, S. 1990 Cognitive foundation of natural history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
2. BARRETT, J. L. & E. T. LQAWSON 2001 Ritual Intuitions: Cognitive Contributions to Judgements of Ritual Efficacy. Journal of Cognition and Culture 1(2): 183-201
3. BOYER, P. 1994 The Naturalness of Religious Ideas. A Cognitive Theory of Religion. Berkeley: University of California Press
4. BOYER, P. & H. C. BARRETT 2005 Evolved Intuitive Ontology: Integrating Neural, Behavioral, and Developmental Aspects of Domain Specificity. In Buss, D. (ed.) Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons
5. DEFEYTER, M. A. & T. GERMAN 2003 Acquiring an understanding of design: evidence from children's insight problem solving. Cognition 89: 133-155
6. DIESENDRUCK, G. 2003 Categories for names or names for categories? The interplay between domain specific, conceptual structure. Language in Cognitive Processes 18 (5/6): 759-787
7. DUNCKER, K. 1945 On problem solving (translated by L. S. Lees)sychological Monographs, 58, No. 270
8. GELMAX, S. A. 2003 The Essential Child: Origins of the Essenlialism in Everyday Thought. Oxford Series in Cognitive Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press
9. GERMAN, T. & H. C. BARRETT 2005 Functional Fixedness in a Technologically Sparse Culturesychological Science 16 (1): 1-5
10. GIBSON, J. J. 1979 The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
11. HIRSCHFELD, L. A. 1995 Anthropology, psychology, and the meaning of social causality. In Sperber, D., DREMACK & A. JREMACK: Causal Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Debate. Oxford: Clarendon Press
12. HIRSCHFELD, L. A. & S. A. GELMAN (EDS.). 1994 Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Culture and Cognition, New York: Cambridge University Press
13. KEIL, F. C. 1989 Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
14. LAWSON, E. T. & R. N. MCCAULEY 1990 Rethinking Religion: Connecting Cognition and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
15. MCCAULEY, R. N. & E. T. LAWSON 2002 Bringing Ritual to Mind: Psychological Foundations of Cultural Forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
16. MEDLN, D. L. & S. ATRAN 2004 The Native Mind: Biological Categorization and Reasoning in Development and Culturessychological Review vol. III, n. 4: 960-983
17. WALKER, S. J. 1999 Culture, domain-specificity and conceptual change: Natural kind and artifact concepts. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 17: 203-219