Enthymemes, argumentation schemes and topics

Logique et Analyse

Volumn 52, Issue 205, 2009, Pages 39-56

  Walton, Douglas ^a,b,c   Macagno, Fabrizio ^d  

^a Assumption University

^b Department of Argumentation Studies ^*

^c UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITÀ CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 65849278367     PISSN: 00245836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Aristotle, 1928. On Sophistical Refutations. Trans. E.S. Forster, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
2. Aristotle, 1939. Topics. Trans. E.S. Forster, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
3. Aristotle, 1937. The Art of Rhetoric. Trans. John Henry Freese, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
4. Bitzer, Lloyd F. 1959. "Aristotle's Enthymeme Revisited". The Quarterly Journal of Speech, XLV: 399-408
5. Boss, George P. 1979. "The Stereotype and its Correspondence in Discourse to the Enthymeme". Communication Quarterly. 27: 22-27
6. Burnyeat, Myles F. 1994. "Enthymeme: Aristotle on the Logic of Persuasion". In David J. Furley and Alexander Nehemas (eds.), Aristotle's Rhetoric: Philosophical Essays, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 3-55
7. Gagarin, Michael 1994. "Probability and Persuasion: Plato and Early Greek Rhetoric". In Ian Worthington (ed.), Persuasion: Greek Rhetoric in Action, London: Routledge, 46-68
8. Hamilton, Sir William 1861. Discussions on Philosophy and Literature. New York: Harper and Brothers
9. Hamilton, Sir William 1874. Lectures on Logic. Edinburgh: William Blackwood and Sons
10. Hastings, Arthur C. 1963. A Reformulation of the Modes of Reasoning in Argumentation, Evanston, Illinois: Ph.D. Dissertation
11. th ed. Belmont, California: Wadsworth
12. Joseph, H.W.B. 1916. An Introduction to Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press
13. Leff, Michael 1983. "The Topics of Argumentative Invention in Latin Rhetorical Theory from Cicero to Boethius". Rhetorica 1: 23-44
14. Kienpointner, Manfred 1992. Alltagslogik: Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern. Stuttgart: Fromman-Holzboog
15. Kienpointner, Manfred 1997. "On the Art of Finding Arguments: What Ancient and Modern Masters of Invention Have to Tell Us About the Ars Inveniendi". Argumentation 11: 225-236
16. McBurney, James H. 1936. "The Place of the Enthymeme in Rhetorical Theory". Speech Monographs 3: 49-74
17. Perelman Chaim and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca 1969. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press
18. Rigotti, Eddo, 2007. "Can Classical Topics be revived within the Contemporary Theory of Argumentation?". Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Amsterdam: SicSat: 1155-1163
19. Rigotti, Eddo and Sara Greco 2006. Topics: The Argument Generator. Argumentum eLearning Module: www. argumentum.ch
20. Tindale, Christopher W. 1999. Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument. Albany: State University of New York Press
21. Walton, Douglas 1996. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum
22. Walton, Douglas. 2008. "The Three Bases for the Enthymeme: A Dialogical Theory". Journal of Applied Logic 6:361-379
23. Walton, Douglas, Chris Reed and Fabrizio Macagno, 2008. Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 2008
24. Warnick, Barbara 2000. "Two Systems of Invention: The Topics in the Rhetoric and The New Rhetoric". In Alan G. Gross and Arthur E. Walzer (eds.), Rereading Aristotle's Rhetoric, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press: 107-129