The three bases for the enthymeme: A dialogical theory

Journal of Applied Logic

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 361-379

  Walton, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINNIPEG   (Canada)

Author keywords

Argument visualization; Argumentation schemes; Common knowledge; Formal dialogue systems; Implicit commitments

Indexed keywords

SPEECH; SPEECH PROCESSING;

ARGUMENT VISUALIZATION TOOLS; ARGUMENTATION SCHEMES; COMMON KNOWLEDGE; DIALOGUE SYSTEMS; NEW THEORY;

SET THEORY;

EID: 47549085969     PISSN: 15708683     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jal.2007.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Acock M. Informal Logic Examples and Exercises (1985), Wadsworth, Belmont
2. Atkinson K., Bench-Capon T., and McBurney P. Computational representation of practical argument. Synthese 152 (2006) 157-206
3. Burke M. Unstated premises. Informal Logic 7 (1985) 107-118
4. Burnyeat M.F. Enthymeme: Aristotle on the logic of persuasion. In: Furley D.J., and Nehemas A. (Eds). Aristotle's Rhetoric: Philosophical Essays (1994), Princeton University Press, Princeton 3-55
5. Ennis R.H. Identifying implicit assumptions. Synthese 51 (1982) 61-86
6. Freeman J.B. The appeal to popularity and presumption by common knowledge. In: Hansen H.V., and Pinto R.C. (Eds). Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings (1995), The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA 263-273
7. Govier T. A Practical Study of Argument. third ed. (1992), Wadsworth, Belmont
8. Gough J., and Tindale C. Hidden or missing premises. Informal Logic 7 (1985) 99-106
9. Grice H.P. Logic and conversation. In: Davidson D., and Harman G. (Eds). The Logic of Grammar (1975), Encino, California 64-75
10. Hamblin C.L. Fallacies (1970), Methuen, London
11. Hamblin C.L. Mathematical models of dialogue. Theoria 37 (1971) 130-155
12. Hitchcock D. Enthymematic arguments. Informal Logic 7 (1985) 83-97
13. Jackson S., and Jacobs S. Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthymeme. Quarterly Journal of Speech 66 (1980) 251-265
14. Krabbe E.C.W. Metadialogues. In: van Eemeren F.H., Blair J.A., Willard C.A., and Snoek Henkemans A.F. (Eds). Anyone Who Has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation (2003), Dordrecht, Kluwer 83-90
15. Mackenzie J.D. The dialectics of logic. Logique et Analyse 24 (1981) 159-177
16. Minsky M. A framework for representing knowledge. In: Winston P. (Ed). The Psychology of Computer Vision (1975), McGraw Hill, New York. http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html reprinted, available at
17. Reed C., and Rowe G. Araucaria: Software for puzzles in argument diagramming and XML. Technical Report, Department of Applied Computing, University of Dundee, 2002; Available at. http://www.computing.dundee.ac.uk/staff/creed/araucaria/
18. C. Reed, G. Rowe, Araucaria, Version 2, User Manual, 2003. Available at http://www.computing.dundee.ac.uk/staff/creed/araucaria/
19. Schank R.C., and Abelson R.P. Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding (1977), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
20. Scriven M. Reasoning (1976), McGraw-Hill, New York
21. Singh P., Lin T., Mueller E.T., Lim G., Perkins T., and Wan Li Zhu. Open mind common sense: Knowledge acquisition form the general public. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Ontologies, Databases, and Applications of Semantics for Large Scale Information Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2002), Springer Verlag, Heidelberg
22. van Eemeren F.H., and Grootendorst R. Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions (1984), Foris, Dordrecht
23. van Eemeren F.H., and Grootendorst R. Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies (1992), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
24. Walton D. Logical Dialogue-Games and Fallacies (1984), University Press of America, Lanham, MD. http://io.uwinnipeg.ca/~walton/books.htm Available free at:
25. Walton D. Enthymemes, common knowledge and plausible inference. Philosophy and Rhetoric 34 (2001) 93-112
26. Walton D., and Krabbe E.C.W. Commitment in Dialogue (1995), State University of New York Press, Albany
27. Walton D., and Macagno F. Common knowledge in legal reasoning about evidence. International Commentary on Evidence 3 (2005) 1-42
28. Walton D., and Macagno F. Common knowledge in argumentation. Studies in Communication Sciences 6 (2006) 3-26
29. Walton D., and Reed C. Argumentation schemes and enthymemes. Synthese 145 (2005) 339-370