Accounting for ditransitive constructions with envy and forgive

Functions of Language

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 187-215

  Colleman, Timothy ^a   De Clerck, Bernard ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 65749211363     PISSN: 0929998X     EISSN: 15699765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/fol.15.2.02col     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Colleman, T. (2006) De Nederlandse datiefalternantie: Een constructioneel en corpusgebaseerd onderzoek [The dative alternation in Dutch: A constructional and corpus-based study]. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Ghent University
2. Croft, W. (2003) Lexical rules versus constructions: a false dichotomy. In H. Cuyckens, Th. Berg, R. Dirven, and K.-U. Panther (eds.) Motivation in language: Studies in honour of Günter Radden. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 49-68
3. Cuervo, R. J. (1994) Diccionario de construcción y régimen de la lengua castellana. Santa Fe de Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo
4. Delbecque, N. and B. Lamiroy (1996) Towards a typology of the Spanish dative. In W. van Belle and W. van Langendonck (eds.) The Dative. Vol 1: Descriptive studies. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 73-117
5. De Smet, H. (2005) A corpus of Late Modern English. ICAME-Journal 29: 69-82
6. Geeraerts, D. (1998) The semantic structure of the indirect object in Dutch. In W. van Langendonck and W. van Belle (eds.) The dative. Vol II: Theoretical and contrastive studies. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 185-210
7. Goldberg, A.E. (1992) The inherent semantics of argument structure: The case of the English ditransitive. Cognitive Linguistics 3: 37-74
8. Goldberg, A.E. (1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
9. Goldsmith, J. (1980), Meaning and mechanism in Grammar. In S. Kuno (ed.) Harvard Studies in Syntax and Semantics 3. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Linguistics Dpt. 423-428
10. Goossens, L., P. Pauwels, B. Rudzka-Ostyn, A.-M. Simon-Vandenbergen, and J. Vanparys (eds.) (1995) By word of mouth: Metaphor, metonymy and linguistic action in a cognitive perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins
11. Green, G.M. (1974) Semantics and syntactic regularity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press
12. Grondelaers, S., K. Deygers, H. van Aken, V. van den Heede, and D. Speelman (2000) Het CONDIV -corpus geschreven Nederlands. Nederlandse Taalkunde 5: 356-363
13. Gropen, J., S. Pinker, M. Hollander, R. Goldberg, and R. Wilson (1989) The Learnability and Acquisition of the Dative Alternation in English. Language 65: 203-257
14. Herriman, J. (1995) The indirect object in present-day English. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis
15. Hunston, S. and G. Francis (2000) Pattern grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins
16. Janda, L.A. (1990) The radial network of a grammatical category - its genesis and dynamic structure. Cognitive Linguistics 1: 269-288
17. Kay, P. (1996) Argument structure: Causative ABC constructions. Unpublished manuscript. http://www.icsi.berkeley.edu/kay/bcg/5/lec05.html
18. Kay, P. (2005) Argument structure constructions and the argument-adjunct distinction. In M. Fried and H. Boas (eds.) Grammatical constructions: Back to the roots. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 71-98
19. Lakoff, G. (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and thought. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 202-251
20. Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
21. Maldonado, R. (2002) Objective and subjective datives. Cognitive Linguistics 13: 1-65
22. MNW = E. Verwijs and J. Verdam (eds.) (1885-1952) Middelnederlandsch Woordenboek [Middle Dutch Dictionary]. The Hague: Nijhoff
23. Mukherjee, J. (2005) English ditransitive verbs. Aspects of theory, description and a usage-based model. Amsterdam: Rodopi
24. Mukherjee, J. and S. Hoffmann (2006) Describing verb-complementational profiles of new Englishes: A pilot study of Indian English. English World-Wide 27: 147-173
25. Newman, J. (1996) Give: A cognitive linguistic study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
26. OED = J. Simpson et al. (eds.) The Oxford English dictionary [electronic version]. Oxford: Oxford University Press
27. Olavarría de Ersson, E. and P. Shaw (2003) Verb complementation patterns in Indian Standard English. English World-Wide 24: 137-161
28. Pinker, S. (1989) Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press
29. Reddy, M. (1979) The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 284-324
30. Rohdenburg, G. (1995) Betrachtungen zum Auf- und Abstieg einiger präpositionaler Konstruktionen im Englischen. NOWELE 26: 67-124
31. Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (1996) The Polish dative. In: W. van Belle and W. van Langendonck (eds), The Dative. Vol. 1: Descriptive studies. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 341-394
32. Stefanowitsch, A. and S.Th. Gries (2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8: 209-243
33. Visser, F. Th. (1963) An historical syntax of the English language. Part 1: Syntactical units with one verb. Leiden: E.J. Brill
34. Wierzbicka, A. (1988) The semantics of grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins
35. WNT = M. De Vries, L.A. Te Winkel et al. (eds.) (1882-1998), Woordenboek der Nederlandsche taal [Dictionary of the Dutch language]. The Hague: Nijhoff