Multiple sclerosis patients′ benefit-risk preferences: Serious adverse event risks versus treatment efficacy

Journal of Neurology

Volumn 256, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 554-562

  Johnson, F Reed ^a   Van Houtven, George ^a   Özdemir, Semra ^a   Hass, Steve ^b   White, Jeff ^b   Francis, Gordon ^b   Miller, David W ^b   Phillips, J Theodore ^c  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^b ELAN PHARMACEUTICALS   (United States)

^c Multiple Sclerosis Center at Texas Neurology   (United States)

Author keywords

Benefit risk analysis; Conjoint analysis; Maximum acceptable risk; Multiple sclerosis; Side effect risk

Indexed keywords

NATALIZUMAB;

ADVERSE DRUG REACTION; ARTICLE; DEATH; DISEASE COURSE; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG SAFETY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEUKEMIA; LIVER FAILURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGRESSIVE MULTIFOCAL LEUKOENCEPHALOPATHY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECURRENCE RISK; RELAPSE; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

BAYES THEOREM; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEUROPROTECTIVE AGENTS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECURRENCE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 65749119370     PISSN: 03405354     EISSN: 14321459     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-009-0084-2     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Andrews CJ (2005) Lessons from the New Jersey Comparative Risk Project. In: Linkov I, Ramadan AB (eds) Comparative Risk Assessment and Environmental Decision Making. Netherlands: Springer
2. Brassat 2002 Neurology 59 954
3. Bryan 1998 Health Economics 7 595
4. Calfee, John E (2006) A representative survey of M.S. patients on attitudes toward the benefits and risks of drug therapy. AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies. Related Publication 06-07 (March)
5. Corso 2001 The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 23 165
6. Covey 2007 Medical Decision Making 27 638
7. Edwards 2008 Patient Education and Counseling 71 4
8. European Medicines Agency, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) (2007) Report of the CHMP Working Group on Benefit-Risk Assessment Models and Methods (January)
9. Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S, Slovic P, Derby SL, Keeney RL (1981) Acceptable risk. New York: Cambridge University Press
10. Francis 2003 Drug Safety 26 815
11. Gan 2004 British Journal of Anaesthesia 92 681
12. Ghosh 2005 J Lab Clin Med 145 171
13. Gregory 1993 Analysis 13 259
14. Health Talk (2006) Available at: www.healthtalk.com. Last accessed 4/26/2006
15. Hensher DA, Rose JM, Greene WH (2005) Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK
16. Hughes 1991 Med Care 29 297
17. Huber 1996 Journal of Marketing Research 33 307
18. Institute of Medicine Committee on the Assessment of the US Drug Safety System(2006) The Future of Drug Safety: Promoting and Protecting the Health of the Public. In: Alina Baciu, Kathleen Stratton, Sheila P. Burke (eds) National Academy of Sciences: Washington, D.C.
19. Johnson 2007 Journal of Women's Health 16 1028
20. Johnson 2007 Gastroenterology 133 769
21. Johnson 2007 Med Care 45 545
22. Johnson 2001 American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83 1328
23. Johnson 2000 Health Economics 9 295
24. Kanninen 2002 Journal of Marketing Research 39 214
25. Kobelt 2006 Neurology 66 1696
26. Kremer 2007 Medical Decision Making 27 522
27. Krupnick 2002 Journal of Risk Uncertainty 24 161
28. Lipkus 2007 Medical Decision Making 27 696
29. Mendeloff J (1995) Decision Analysis and FDA Drug Review: A Proposal for Shadow Advisory Committees. Risk (Summer):203-214
30. Patrick 1994 Medical Decision Making 14 9
31. Polman 2006 N Engl J Med 354 899
32. Ryan 1998 Health Economics 7 373
33. Sandman 1994 Risk Analysis 14 35
34. Slovic 1987 Science 236 280
35. Train K (2003) Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
36. Train K, Sonnier G (2005) Mixed logit with bounded distributions of correlated partworths. In: Scarpa R, Alberini A (eds) Applications of simulation methods in environmental and resource economics. Springer Publisher, Dordrecht
37. Yousry 2006 N Engl J Med 354 924
38. Zwerina K, Huber J, Kuhfeld W (1996) A general method for constructing efficient choice designs. Durham: Fuqua School of Business, Duke University