Low dose of fentanyl reduces predicted effect-site concentration of propofol for flexible laryngeal mask airway insertion

Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 203-208

  Yumura, Junko ^a   Koukita, Yoshihiko ^a   Fukuda, Ken Ichi ^a   Kaneko, Yuzuru ^a   Ichinohe, Tatsuya ^a  

^a TOKYO DENTAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bispectral index; Fentanyl; Flexible laryngeal mask airway; Propofol

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; PIRENZEPINE; PROPOFOL; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ADULT; ANESTHESIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; ARTERIAL OXYGEN SATURATION; ARTICLE; BISPECTRAL INDEX; BREATHING RATE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EFFECT SITE CONCENTRATION; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; LARYNGEAL MASK; LOW DRUG DOSE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ORAL SURGERY; PREDICTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPIRATION DEPRESSION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FENTANYL; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; HYPNOTICS AND SEDATIVES; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORAL SURGICAL PROCEDURES; OXYGEN; PREANESTHETIC MEDICATION; PROPOFOL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 65749112031     PISSN: 09138668     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00540-008-0728-x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Brimacombe J, Keller C. Comparison of the flexible and standard laryngeal mask airways. Can J Anaesth. 1999;46:558-563.
2. Tsutsui F, Kodaka M. Propofol concentration requirement for laryngeal mask airway insertion was highest with the ProSeal, next highest with the Fastrach, and lowest with the Classic type, with target-controlled infusion. J Clin Anesth. 2005;17:344-347.
3. Casati A, Fanelli G, Casaletti E, Cedrati V, Veglia F, Torri G. The target plasma concentration of propofol required to place laryngeal mask versus cuffed oropharyngeal airway. Anesth Analg. 1999;88:917-920.
4. Kodaka M, Okamoto Y, Handa F, Kawasaki J, Miyao H. Relation between fentanyl dose and predicted EC50 of propofol for laryngeal mask insertion. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92:238-241.
5. Gourlay GK, Kowalski SR, Plummer JL, Cousin MJ, Armstrong PJ. Fentanyl blood concentration-analgesic response relationship in the treatment of postoperative pain. Anesth Analg. 1988;67:329-337.
6. Shafer SL, Varvel JR. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and rational opioid selection. Anesthesiology. 1991;74:53-63.
7. Barker P, Langton JA, Wilson IG, Smith G. Movements of the vocal cords on induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone or propofol. Br J Anaesth. 1992;69:23-25.
8. Brown GW, Patel N, Eliis FR. Comparison of propofol and thiopentone for laryngeal mask airway insertion. Anaesthesia. 1991;46:771-772.
9. Iannuzzi M, Iannuzzi E, Rossi F, Berrino L, Chiefari M. Relationship between bispectral index, electroencephalographic state entropy and effect-site EC50 for propofol at different clinical endpoints. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94:613-616.
10. Gepts E, Camu F, Cockshott ID, Douglas EJ. Disposition of propofol administered as constant rate intravenous infusion in humans. Anesth Analg. 1987;66:1256-1263.
11. Dixon WJ. Stairpatient bioassay: The up-and-down method. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1991;15:47-50.
12. 50 of propofol for loss of consciousness and skin incision. Anesthesiology. 1994;81:820-828.
13. Kazama T, Ikeda K, Morita K. The pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and fentanyl with respect to the suppression of somatic or hemodynamic responses to skin incision, peritoneum incision, and abdominal wall retraction. Anesthesiology. 1998;89:894-906.
14. Kazama T, Ikeda K, Morita K, Katoh T, Kikura M. Propofol concentration required for endtracheal intubation with a laryngoscope or fiberscope and its interaction with fentanyl. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:872-879.
15. 50 values of propofol and hemodynamic responses to various noxious stimuli. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:213-227.
16. Krasowski MD, Nishikawa K, Nikolaeva N, Lin A, Harrison NL. Methionine 286 in transmembrane domain 3 of the GABA A receptor β-subunit controls a binding cavity for propofol and other alkylphenol general anesthetics. Neuropharmacology. 2001;41:952-964.
17. Kamei J, Tanihara H, Kasuya Y. Antitussive effects of two specific κ-opioid agonists, U-50,488H and U-62,066E, in rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 1990;187:281-286.
18. Kamei J, Tanihara H, Kasuya Y. Modulation of μ-mediated antitussive activity in rats by a δ agonist. Eur J Pharmacol. 1991;203:153-156
19. Wang LP, McLoughlin P, Peach MJ, Kurowski I, Brandon EL. Low and moderate remifentanil infusion rates do not alter targetcontrolled infusion propofol concentrations necessary to maintain anaesthesia as assessed by bispectral index monitoring. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:325-331.
20. Tagaito Y, Isono S, Nishino T. Upper airway reflexes during a combination of propofol and fentanyl anaesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1998;88:1459-1466.
21. Manyam SC, Gupta DK, Johnson KB, White JL, Pace NL, Westenskow DR, Egan TD. Opioid-volatile anesthetic synergy. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:267-278.