E-type anaphora and three types of kes-construction in Korean

Natural Language and Linguistic Theory

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 345-377

  Kim, Min Joo ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Direct perception construction; E type anaphora; Factive construction; Internally Headed Relative Clause construction; Kratzerian situation semantics

Indexed keywords

EID: 65749093294     PISSN: 0167806X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11049-009-9065-5     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Jon. Barwise 1981 Scenes and other situations Journal of Philosophy 78 369 397
2. Barwise, Jon, and John Perry. 1983. Situations and attitudes. Cambridge: MIT Press.
3. David. Basilico 2003 The topic of small clauses Linguistic Inquiry 34 1 35
4. Jonathan. Berg 1988 The pragmatics of substitutivity Linguistics and Philosophy 11 3 355 370
5. Carlson, Gregory, H. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. PhD Dissertation, University of Massachusetts-Amherst.
6. Hyon Sook. Chae 2007 On the categorial ambiguity of the morpheme kes in Korean Language Research 43 2 229 264
7. Chung, Chan, and Jong-Bok Kim. 2003. Differences between externally and internally headed relative clause constructions. In On-line proceedings of HPSG 2002, ed. Jong-Bok Kim, 3-25.
8. Dae-ho. Chung 1999 A complement analysis of the head internal relative clauses Language and Information 3 1 12
9. Déchaine, Rose-Marie. 1993. Predicates across categories. PhD Dissertation, University of Massachusetts-Amherst.
10. Dowty, David. 1979. Word meaning and montague grammar. PhD Dissertation, University of Texas.
11. Elbourne, Paul. 2005. Situations and individuals. Cambridge: MIT Press.
12. Felser, Claudia. 1999. Verbal complement clauses: a minimalist study of direct perception constructions. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
13. Masaaki. Fuji 1998 Temporal interpretation of internally headed relative clauses in Japanese Working Papers from Rutgers University 1 75 91
14. Naoki Fukui Margaret Speas. 1986 Specifiers and projection MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 8 128 172
15. Guasti, Maria-Teresa. 1993. Causative and perception verbs: a comparative study. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.
16. Heim, Irene, and Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
17. James. Higginbotham 1983 The logic of perceptual reports: an extensional alternative to situation semantics The Journal of Philosophy 80 100 127
18. Horie, Kaoru. 1993. A cross-linguistic study of perception and cognition verb complements: a cognitive perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.
19. Hoshi, Koji. 1995. Structural and interpretive aspects of head-internal and head-external relative Clauses. PhD dissertation, University of Rochester.
20. Jhang, Sea-eun. 1991. Internally headed relative clauses in Korean. In Harvard studies in Korean linguistics, eds. Susumu Kuno, 269-280. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing.
21. Jhang, Sea-eun. 1994. Headed nominalizations in Korean: relative clauses, clefts, and comparatives. PhD dissertation, Simon Fraser University.
22. Mi-Jeung. Jo 2003 The correlation between syntactic nominalization and the internally headed relative constructions in Korean Studies in Generative Grammar 13 535 564
23. Jung, Yunsun. 1995. Internally headed relative clauses in Korean. In Harvard studies in Korean linguistics, eds. Susumu Kuno, 235-248. Seoul: Hanshin.
24. Lauri. Karttunen 1973 Presuppositions of compound sentences Linguistic Inquiry 4 169 193
25. Kim, Min-Joo. 2004. Event structure and the internally-headed relative clause construction in Korean and Japanese. PhD Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
26. Min-Joo. Kim 2007 Formal linking in internally headed relatives Natural Language Semantics 15 279 315
27. Kim, Nam-Kil. 1984. The grammar of Korean complementation. Center for Korean Studies, Manoa: University of Hawaii at Manoa.
28. Yong-Beom. Kim 2002 Relevancy in internally headed relative clauses in Korean Lingua 112 541 559
29. Kiparsky, Paul, and Carol Kiparsky. 1970. Fact. In Progress in linguistics, eds. Manfred Bierwisch and Karl Erich Heidolph, 143-173. The Hague: Mouton.
30. Ewan Klein Ivan Sag. 1985 Type-driven translation Linguistics and Philosophy 8 163 201
31. Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in languageLondon: Routledge.
32. Hilda Koopman Dominique Sportiche. 1991 The position of subjects Lingua 85 211 258
33. Angelika. Kratzer 1989 An investigation of the lumps of thought Linguistics and Philosophy 12 607 653
34. Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Scope or pseudoscope? Are there wide-scope indefinites? In Events and grammar, ed. Susan Rothstein, 163-196. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
35. Angelika. Kratzer 2002 Facts: particulars or information units Linguistics and Philosophy 25 2 655 670
36. Kratzer, Angelika. 2008. Situations in natural language semantics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ situations-smantics/#SitSemDavEveSem.
37. Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
38. Kuroda, Shige-yuki. 1992. Japanese syntax and semantics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
39. Fred. Landman 1992 The progressive Natural Language Semantics 1 1 32
40. Landman, Fred. 2000. Events and plurality: the jerusalem lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
41. Lee, Jeong-Rae. 2006. The Korean internally headed relative clause construction: its morphological, syntactic and semantic aspects. Dissertation, University of Arizona
42. Lee, Miae. 2004. Focus-induced constraints in head-internal relatives. In Harvard studies in Korean linguistics, eds. Susumu Kuno, 568-581. Seoul: Hanshiu Publishing.
43. Lefebvre, Claire, and Pieter Muysken. 1988. Mixed categories, nominalizations in Quechua. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
44. Link, Godard. 1983. The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: a lattice-theoretical approach. In Meaning, use and interpretation of language, eds. R. Bauerle, 302-323. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
45. Yuki. Matsuda 2002 Event sensitivity of head-internal relatives in Japanese Japanese/Korean Linguistics 10 629 643
46. Ohara, H.K. 1993. On Japanese internally headed relative clauses. In Vol. 18 of Proceedings of BLS, eds. Buszard-Wechsler et al., 100-109.
47. Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the semantics of English: a study in subatomic semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
48. Partee, Barbara H., and Mats Rooth. 1983. Generalized conjunction and type ambiguity. In Meaning, use, and interpretation of language, eds. Rainer Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarze, Arnim, and von Stechow, 361-383. Berlin: de Gruyter.
49. Portner, Paul. 1992. Situation theory and the semantics of propositional expressions. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
50. Sells, Peter. 1986. Coreference and bound anaphora: a restatement of the facts. In Vol. 16 of Proceedings of NELS, eds. Jae-Woong Choe, Stephen Berman, and Joyce McDonough. Cambridge: University of Massachusetts-Amherst: GLSA publications.
51. Junko. Shimoyama 1999 Internally headed relative clauses in Japanese and E-type anaphora Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8 147 182