Formal linking in internally headed relatives

Natural Language Semantics

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 279-315

  Kim, Min Joo ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

E type pronoun; Formal linking problem; Internally Headed Relatives

Indexed keywords

EID: 36649013696     PISSN: 0925854X     EISSN: 1572865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11050-007-9020-0     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Chierchia G. (1995). Dynamics of meaning. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press
2. Chung C., Kim J.-B. (2003). Differences between Externally and Internally Headed Relative Clause Constructions. In: Kim J.-B. (eds). On-line proceedings of HPSG 2002. Stanford, CSLI Publications, pp. 3-25
3. Chung D.-H. (1999). A complement analysis of the Head Internal Relative Clauses. Language and Information, 3, 1-12
4. Cooper R. (1979). Interpretation of pronouns. In: Henry F., Schnelle H. (eds). Syntax and semantics 10. New York, Academic Press, pp. 61-92
5. Dowty D., Wall R., Peters S. (1981). Introduction to Montague Grammar. Dordrecht, Reidel
6. Elbourne P. (2001). E-type anaphora as NP-deletion. Natural Language Semantics, 9, 241-288
7. Elbourne P. (2005). Situations and individuals. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press
8. Evans G. (1977). Pronouns, quantifiers, and relative clauses. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 7, 467-536
9. Evans G. (1980). Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 337-362
10. Fuji, M. (1998). Temporal interpretation of Internally Headed Relative Clauses in Japanese. Working Papers from Rutgers University 1 (pp. 75-91). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
11. Fukui, N., & Speas, M. (1986). Specifiers and projection. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 8 (pp. 128-172). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.
12. Hale K.L. (1976). The adjoined relative clause in Australia. In: Dixon R.M.W. (eds). Grammatical categories in Australian languages. Canberra, AIAS, pp. 78-105
13. Hastings R. (2002). The interpretation of Cuzco Quechua relative clauses. In: Kim J., Werle A. (eds). University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 25: Proceedings from SULA 1. Amherst, Mass., GLSA Publications, pp. 53-62
14. Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
15. Heim I. (1990). E-type pronouns and donkey-anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy, 13, 137-177
16. Heim I., Kratzer A. (1998). Semantics in generative grammar. Malden, Mass., Blackwell
17. Hoshi, K. (1995). Structural and interpretive aspects of Head-Internal and Head-External Relative Clauses. PhD dissertation, University of Rochester.
18. Jacobson P. (1995). On the quantificational force of English free relatives. In: Bach E., Jelinek E., Kratzer A., Partee B. (eds). Quantification in natural languages. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 451-486
19. Jhang, S.-E. (1994). Headed nominalizations in Korean: Relative clauses, clefts, and comparatives. PhD dissertation, Simon Fraser University.
20. Jo M.-J. (2003). The correlation between syntactic nominalization and the Internally Headed Relative Constructions in Korean. Studies in Generative Grammar, 13, 535-564
21. Kadmon, N. (1987). On unique and non-unique reference and asymmetric quantification. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
22. Kim M.-J. (2004). Three types of kes-nominalization in Korean. In: Lee I.-H. et al. (eds). Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics 10. Seoul, Hanshin, pp. 479-492
23. Kim N.-K. (1984). The grammar of Korean complementation. Center for Korean Studies, University of Hawaii at Manoa
24. Kim Y.-B. (2002). Relevancy in Internally Headed Relative Clauses in Korean. Lingua, 112, 541-559
25. Kitagawa C. (2005). Typological variation of Head-Internal Relatives in Japanese. Lingua, 115, 1243-1276
26. Klein W. (1994). Time in language. London, UK, Routledge
27. Klein E., Sag I. (1985). Type-driven translation. Linguistics and Philosophy, 8, 163-201
28. Kratzer A. (1998). More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. In: Strolovitch D. et al. (eds). Semantics and linguistic theory 8. Ithaca, NY, CLC Publications, pp. 92-110
29. Kubota, Y., & Allyn Smith, E. (to appear). The Japanese Internally Headed Relative Clause is not an E-type pronoun. In Proceedings of Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics 4, MITWPL. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.
30. Kuroda S.-Y. (1975-1976). Pivot-independent relativization in Japanese II: Types of Japanese relatives. Papers in Japanese Linguistics, 4, 157-179
31. Kuroda S.-Y. (1976-1977). Pivot-independent relativization in Japanese III: Types of Japanese relatives. Papers in Japanese Linguistics, 5, 157-179
32. Kuroda S.-Y. (1992). Japanese syntax and semantics. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers
33. Landman F. (2000). Events and plurality: The Jerusalem lectures. Dordrecht, Kluwer
34. Lee, J.-R. (2006). The Korean Internally Headed Relative Clause construction: Its morphological, syntactic and semantic aspects. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.
35. Link G. (1983). The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. In: Bauerle R. et al. (eds). Meaning, use and interpretation of language. Berlin, de Gruyter, pp. 302-323
36. Matsuda, Y. (2002). Event sensitivity of Head-Internal Relatives in Japanese. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 10 (pp. 629-643). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
37. Murasugi K. (1994). Head-Internal Relative Clauses as adjunct pure complex NPs. In: Chiba S. et al. (eds). Synchronic and diachronic approaches to language: a festschrift for Toshio Nakao. Tokyo, Liber Press, pp. 425-437
38. Parsons T. (1990). Events in the semantics of English: A study in subatomic semantics. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press
39. Shimoyama J. (1999). Internally Headed Relative Clauses in Japanese and E-type anaphora. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 8, 147-182
40. Shimoyama, J. (2001). Wh-constructions in Japanese. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
41. Suh J.-S. (1996). Kuke Mwumpep [The Korean grammar]. Seoul, Hanyang University Press
42. Sohn S.-O. (1995). Tense and aspect in Korean. Center for Korean Studies, University of Hawaii at Honolulu
43. Takubo, Y. (2005). Overt marker for individual sublimination. Ms., Kyoto University.
44. Tsubomoto, A. (1991). Syuyoobu-naizaigata-kankeisetu. Gendai Eigogaku no Ayumi (pp. 253-262). Tokyo: Kaitakusya.
45. Yang B.-S. (1993). Clause and information structure of Korean relative clauses in Role and Reference Grammar. In: Bernstein M. (eds). Proceedings of the 1992 Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, pp. 282-293