Sensitivity and specificity with the glaucoma probability score in Heidelberg retina tomograph II in Japanese eyes

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 227-232

  Saito, Hitomi ^a,b   Tomidokoro, Atsuo ^a   Yanagisawa, Mieko ^a   Iwase, Aiko ^b   Araie, Makoto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b Tajimi Municipal Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; Glaucoma probability score; HRT II

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE REFRACTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; JAPAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYOPIA; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; RETINA IMAGE; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY; ASIAN; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; GONIOSCOPY; INSTRUMENTATION; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LASER; MIDDLE AGED; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; PROBABILITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; GONIOSCOPY; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LASERS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PROBABILITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 65649122665     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181815438     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Mikelberg FS, Parfitt CM, Swindale NV, et al. Ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph to detect early glaucomatous visual field loss. J Glaucoma. 1996;4:242-247.
2. Uchida H, Brigatti L, Caprioli J. Detection of structural damage from glaucoma with confocal laser image analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:2393-2401. (Pubitemid 26391277)
3. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA, et al. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1557-1563. (Pubitemid 28509784)
4. Iester M, Mikelberg FS, Drance SM. The effect of optic disc size on diagnostic precision with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Ophthalmology 1997;104:545-548. (Pubitemid 27120315)
5. Garway-Heath DF, Poinoosawmy D, Wollstein G, et al. Interand intraobserver variation in the analysis of optic disc images: comparison of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph and computer assisted planimetry. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:664-669. (Pubitemid 29261653)
6. Iester M, Mikelberg FS, Courtright P, et al. Interobserver variability of optic disk variables measured by confocal scanning laser tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132:57-62. (Pubitemid 32600890)
7. Swindale NV, Stjepanovic G, Chin A, et al. Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41: 1730-1742. (Pubitemid 30354344)
8. Harizman N, Zelefsky JR, Ilitchev E, et al. Detection of glaucoma using operator-dependent versus operator-independent classification in the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph-III. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:1390-1392. (Pubitemid 44702067)
9. Coops A, Henson DB, Kwarts AJ, et al. Automated analysis of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph optic disc images by glaucoma probability score. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47: 5348-5355. (Pubitemid 46723784)
10. Burgansky-Eliash Z, Wollstein G, Bilonick RA, et al. Glaucoma detection with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:466-471. (Pubitemid 46299101)
11. Zelefsky JR, Harizman N, Mora R, et al. Assessment of a racespecific normative HRT-III database to differentiate glaucomatous from normal eyes. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:548-551. (Pubitemid 44760331)
12. De Leon-Ortega JE, Sakata LM, Monheit BE, et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 to discriminate glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:525-532.
13. Chi T, Ritch R, Stickler D, et al. Racial differences in optic nerve parameters. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107:836-839.
14. Varma R, Tielsch JM, Quigley HA, et al. Race-, age-, gender-, and refractive error-related differences in the normal optic disc. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:1068-1076.
15. Girkin CA, McGwin G Jr, Xie A, et al. Differences in optic disc topography between black and white normal subjects. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:33-39.
16. Racette L, Boden C, Kleinhandler SL, et al. Differences in visual function and optic nerve structure between healthy eyes of blacks and whites. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:1547-1553.
17. Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Berry CC, et al. Racial differences in optic disc topography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:22-28.
18. Shimizu N, Nomura H, Ando F, et al. Refractive errors and factors associated with myopia in an adult Japanese population. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2003;47:6-12.
19. Cheng CY, Hsu WM, Liu JH, et al. Refractive errors in an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: the Shihpai Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:4630-4638.
20. Wong TY, Foster PJ, Hee J, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in adult Chinese in Singapore. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;4:2486-2494.
21. Sawada A, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, et al. Refractive errors in an elderly Japanese population: the Tajimi Study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:363-370.
22. Anderson DR, Pattela VM. Automated Static Perimetry. St Louis: Mosby; 1999:152-153.
23. Iwase A, Suzuki Y, Araie M, et al. The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japanese: the Tajimi Study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1641-1648.
24. Zangwill LM, Chan K, Bowd C, et al. Heidelberg retina tomography measurements of the optic disc and parapapillary retina for detecting glaucoma analyzed by machine learning classifiers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004; 45:3144-3151.
25. Uchida H, Yamamoto T, Araie M, et al. Topographic characteristics of the optic nerve head measured with scanning laser tomography in normal Japanese subjects. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2005;49:469-476.
26. Ramrattan RS, Wolfs RC, Jonas JB, et al. Determinants of optic disc characteristics in a general population. The Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:1588-1596.
27. Wang Y, Xu L, Zhang L, et al. Optic disc size in a population based study in northern China: the Beijing Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:353-356.
28. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, et al. Influence of disease severity and optic disc size on the diagnostic performance of imaging instruments in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:1008-1015.
29. Ford BA, Artes PH, McCormick TA, et al. Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with the Heidelberg retina tomography. Ophthalmology. 2003;110: 1145-1150.
30. Caprioli J, Miller JM. Optic disc rim area is related to disc size in normal subjects. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105: 1683-1685.
31. Jonas JB, Gusek GC, Naumann GO. Optic disc, cup and neuroretinal rim size, configuration and correlations in normal eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988;29:1151-1158.