Variation in the results of Norway Spruce planting and Scots pine direct seeding in privately-owned forests in Southern Finland

Silva Fennica

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 51-70

  Kankaanhuhta, Ville ^a   Saksa, Timo ^a   Smolander, Heikki ^a  

^a FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Forest regeneration inventory; Forest regeneration survey; Picea abies; Pinus sylvestris; Quality control; Quality management

Indexed keywords

PLANTS (BOTANY); QUALITY CONTROL; QUALITY MANAGEMENT; SEED; SOIL SURVEYS; SOILS; TEXTURES; TIMBER;

FOREST REGENERATION; FORESTRY PROFESSIONAL; HIERARCHY STRUCTURE; PICEA ABIES; PICEA ABIES (L.) KARST; PINUS SYLVESTRIS; SCOTS PINE SEEDLINGS; SOIL CHARACTERISTICS;

REFORESTATION;

EVERGREEN TREE; FOREST INVENTORY; PLANTATION; QUALITY CONTROL; REGENERATION; SEEDING; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

FINLAND; FORESTRY; PICEA ABIES; PINUS SYLVESTRIS; PLANTING; QUALITY CONTROL; REFORESTATION; SEEDING; TQM;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FINLAND; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA;

PICEA ABIES; PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 65649098356     PISSN: 00375330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14214/sf.217     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Act on the Forestry Centres and Forestry Development Centre Tapio 474/1995. 1995. [Online Legislation]. Available at: http://www.finlex.fi/fi/ laki/ajantasa/1995/19951474. [Cited 7 Nov 2008].
2. Cajander, A.K. 1926. The theory of forest types. Acta Forestalia Fennica 29(3): 108
3. 1949. Forest types and their significance. Acta Forestalia Fennica 56. 71 p.
4. Deming, E.W. 1986. Out of the crisis. Cambridge University Press. Massachusetts, USA. 507 p.
5. Eid, T., Heringstad, J. &Nersten, S. 1986. Sampling number of trees in regeneration. Meddelelser fra Norsk Institut for Skogsforskning (Communications of the Norwegian Forest research Institute) 39(12): 215-232.
6. Finnish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry. 2007. The Finnish Forest Research Institute. SVT, Agriculture, Forestry and Fishery. 436 p.
7. Forest Management Association Act 534/1998. 1998. [Online legislation]. Available at: http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/1998/19980534 [Cited 21 Jul 2008].
8. Goldstein, H. 1996. Multilevel statistical models. Kendall's Library of Statistics 3. 2nd ed. 178 p.
9. Goulet, F. 1995. Frost heaving of forest tree seedlings: a review. New Forests 9: 67-94. (Pubitemid 26447977)
10. Hämäläinen, J. & Räsänen, T. 1993. Menetelmä metsänuudistamisen varhaistuloksen mittaukseen. Metsätehon katsaus 6/1993. 6 p. (In Finnish).
11. Hartikainen, S. & Kokkonen, J. 1996. Yksityismetsissä isot uudistamisrästit. Metsänviljely pitäisi kaksinkertaistaa. Koneyrittäjä 2. p. 26. (In Finnish).
12. Holgén, P. &Hå;nell, B. 2000. Performance of planted and regenerated seedlings in Picea abies -dominated shelterwood stands and clearcuts in Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management 127: 129-138. (Pubitemid 30086357)
13. Hyppönen, M., Alenius, V. &Valkonen, S. 2005. Models for the establishment and height development of naturally regenerated Pinus sylvestris in Finnish Lapland. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 20: 347-357. (Pubitemid 41260756)
14. Ishikawa, K. 1985. What is total quality control? The Japanese way. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs. 215 p.
15. Juran, J. M. 1951. Quality-control handbook. McGraw- Hill, New York. 800 p.
16. Kalland, F. 2002. Metsänuudistamisen laadun hallinta. Kokemuksia teollisuuden metsistä. Metsätieteen aikakauskirja 1/2002: 35-41. (In Finnish). - 2004. Metsänuudistamisen laadunohjaus - niuhotusta vai tie laatuun ja kustannustehokkuuteen. Metsätieteen aikakauskirja 4/2004: 546-550. (In Finnish).
17. 2004. Metsänuudistamisen laadunohjaus - niuhotusta vai tie laatuun ja kustannustehokkuuteen. Metsätieteen aikakauskirja 4/2004: 546-550. (In Finnish).
18. Kankaanhuhta, V., Saksa, T. &Smolander, H. 2009. Cost-quality relationship of Norway spruce planting and Scots pine direct seeding in privatelyowned forests in southern Finland. (Submitted manuscript).
19. Karlsson, C. &Örlander, G. 2000. Soil scarification shortly before a rich seed fall improves seedling establishment in seed tree stands of Pinus sylvestris. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 15: 256-266. (Pubitemid 30334402)
20. Karppinen, H. 2005. Forest owners' choice of reforestation method: an application of theory of planned behavior. Forest Policy and Economics 7(3): 393-409. (Pubitemid 40210781)
21. Hänninen, H. &Ripatti, P. 2002. Suomalainen metsänomistaja 2000. Finnish Forest Research Institute Research Papers 852. 83 p. (In Finnish).
22. Kempe, G. 1995. MÂtt p föryngringens kvalitet - stabilitet och samband med framtida volymproduktion. Institutionen för Skogstaxering. Rapport 59. 140 p. (In Swedish).
23. Kinnunen, K. 1982. Scots pine sowing on barren mineral soils in western Finland. Folia Forestalia 531. 24 p. - 1989. Effect of seedling type and site preparation on the initial development of Scots pine and Norway spruce. Folia Forestalia 727. 23 p.
24. 1989. Effect of seedling type and site preparation on the initial development of Scots pine and Norway spruce. Folia Forestalia 727. 23 p.
25. 1992. Tuloksia kone- ja käsinkylvöstä. Finnish Forest Research Institute Research Papers 426: 123-133. (In Finnish).
26. 1993. Direct sowing and natural regeneration of Scots pine in western Finland. Finnish Forest Research Institute Research Papers 447. 36 p.
27. & Mäki-Kojola, S. 1980. Natural regeneration of Scots pine in western Finland. Folia Forestalia 449. 18 p.
28. & Nerg, J. 1982. State of sown and naturally regenerated young Scots pine stands in the private forests of western Finland. Folia Forestalia 535. 16 p.
29. Lähde, E. 1974. The effect of grain size distribution on the condition of natural and artificial sapling stands of Scots pine. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae 84(3). 23 p.
30. Laine, J. &Vasander, H. 1990. Suotyypit. 2nd ed. Kirjayhtymä, Helsinki. 80 p. (In Finnish).
31. Lillrank, P. 2003. The quality of standard, routine and nonroutine processes. Organisation Studies 24(2): 215-233. (Pubitemid 36932006)
32. Luonnonläheinen metsänhoito. Metsänhoitosuositukset. 1994. Metsäkeskus Tapion julkaisuja 6/1994. 72 p. (In Finnish).
33. McCullagh, P. &Nelder, J. 1989. Generalized linear models (2nd ed.). Chapman and Hall, University Press, Cambridge. 511 p.
34. McCullogh, C. &Searle, S. 2001. Generalized, linear, and mixed models. John Wiley &Sons, New York. 325 p.
35. Miina, J. &Saksa, T. 2006. Predicting regeneration establishment in Norway spruce plantations using a multivariate multilevel model. New Forests 32: 265-283.
36. Nilsson, U. &Örlander, G. 1999. Vegetation management on grass-dominated clearcuts planted with Norway spruce in southern Sweden. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29: 1015-1026. (Pubitemid 30121338)
37. Ojansuu, R. &Henttonen, H. 1983. Estimation of local values of monthly mean temperature, effective temperature sum and precipitation sum for the measurements made by the Finnish Meteorological Office. Silva Fennica 17: 143-160. (Pubitemid 15255317)
38. Örlander, G. &Due, K. 1986. Water relations of seedlings of Scots pine grown in peat as a function of soil water potential and soil temperature. Studia Forestalia Suecica 175. 13 p. - &Nilsson, U. 1999. Effect of reforestation methods on Pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) damage and seedling survival. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 14: 341-354. - , Gemmel, P. &Hunt, J. 1990. Site preparation: a Swedish overview. FRDA Report 105. 61 p. - , Hallsby, G., Gemmel, P., &Wilhelmsson, C. 1998. Inverting improves establishment of Pinus contorta and Picea abies - 10-year results from a site preparation trial in Northern Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 13: 160-168.
39. & Nilsson, U. 1999. Effect of reforestation methods on Pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) damage and seedling survival. (Pubitemid 29413905)
40. Gemmel, P. &Hunt, J. 1990. Site preparation: a Swedish overview. FRDA Report 105. 61 p.
41. Hallsby, G., Gemmel, P., &Wilhelmsson, C. 1998. Inverting improves establishment of Pinus contorta and Picea abies - 10-year results from a site preparation trial in Northern Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 13: 160-168.
42. Petersson, M., Nordlander, G. &Örlander, G. 2006. Why vegetation increases pine weevil damage: Bridge or shelter? Forest Ecology and Management 225: 368-377.
43. Pohtila, E. 1977. Taimiston inventoinnin tarkkuus. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae 92(2). 43 p. (In Finnish).
44. 1980. Havaintoja taimikoiden ja nuorten metsien tilajärjestyksen kehityksestä Lapissa. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae 98(1). 35 p. (In Finnish).
45. Räsänen, P.K. 1981. Metsäpuiden taimikasvatus ja metsänviljely. Kehysmalli ja sen käyttö. University of Helsinki , Department of Silviculture, Research Notes 29. 98 p. (In Finnish).
46. Pohtila, E., Laitinen, E., Peltonen, A. &Rautiainen, O. 1985. Forest regeneration in the six southernmost forestry board districts of Finland. Results from the inventories in 1978-1979. Folia Forestalia 637. 30 p.
47. Rasbash, J., Steele, F., Browne, W. & Prosser, B. 2004. A user's guide to MLwiN version 2.0. Centre for Multilevel Modelling. Institute of Education, University of London. 256 p.
48. Raulo, J. &Rikala, R. 1974. Tuloksia metsänviljelyalojen tarkistuksista Pohjois-Savon, Etelä-Savon, ja Pohjois-Karjalan piirimetsälautakuntien alueilla. Metsäntutkimuslaitos. Metsänviljelyn koeaseman tiedonantoja 12. 8 p. (In Finnish).
49. &Rikala, R. 1981. Initial development of Scots pine, Norway spruce and silver birch seedlings planted on a forestation site prepared in different ways. Folia Forestalia 462. 13 p.
50. Rikala, R. 2000. Production and quality requirements of forest tree seedlings in Finland. Tree Planter's Notes 49(3): 56-60.
51. Saksa, T. 1992. Development of Scots pine plantations in prepared reforestation areas. Dissertation. Finnish Forest Research Institute Research Papers 418. 48 p.
52. 1998. Metsänuudistamistulos viivästyneillä avohakkuualoilla Etelä-Savossa. Finnish Forest Research Institute Research Papers 695. 31 p. (In Finnish).
53. & Kankaanhuhta, V. 2007. Metsänuudistamisen laatu ja keskeisimmät kehittämiskohteet Etelä- Suomessa. Metsänuudistamisen laadun hallinta -hankkeen loppuraportti. Metsäntutkimuslaitos, Suonenjoen yksikkö. 90 p. (In Finnish).
54. Nerg, J. & Tuovinen, J. 1990. State of 3-8 years old Scots pine and Norway spruce plantations. Folia Forestalia 753. 30 p.
55. Jokinen, M. & Korhonen, J. 1999. Miksi metsänuudistamistoimet poikkeavat suunnitelmasta - haastattelututkimus Pohjois-Savossa. Metsätieteen aikakauskirja 2/1999: 215-226. (In Finnish).
56. Särkkä-Pakkala, K. & Smolander, H. 2002. Työkalu metsänuudistamisen laatutyöhön. Metsätieteen aikakauskirja 1/2002: 29-34.
57. SAS Institute Inc. 2004. SAS/STAT 9.1 User's guide. Cary, NC. 5121 p. (Pubitemid 128553899)
58. Snijders, T. & Bosker, R. 1999. Multilevel analysis. An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. SAGE Publications, London. 266 p.
59. Söderström, V., Bäcke, J., Byfalk, R. &Jonsson, C. 1978. Comparison between planting in mineral soil heaps and some other soil treatment methods. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Silviculture. Report 11. 177 p.
60. Venables, W. & Ripley, B. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S. Springer-Verlag, New York. 495 p.
61. Wilson, G. &Maguire, D. 1996. Simulation of early regeneration processes in mixed-species forests of Maine, USA: germination, survival and height growth. In: Skovsgaard, J. &Johannsen, V. (eds.). Modelling regeneration success and early growth of forest stands. Proceedings from the IUFRO Conference, held in Copenhagen, 10-13 June 1996. Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute, Hoørstholm. p. 530-539.
62. Yli-Vakkuri, P., Räsänen, P.K. &Solin, P. 1969. Metsänviljelyn antamista tuloksista Lounais-Suomen, Itä-Hämeen, Itä-Savon, Keski-Suomen ja Kainuun piirimetsälautakuntien alueella. University of Helsinki, Department of Silviculture. Research Notes 2. 92 p. (In Finnish).