Chemometric models for quantitative analysis of tautomeric schiff bases and azo dyes

Current Organic Chemistry

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 217-240

  Nedeltcheva, Daniela ^a   Antonov, Liudmil ^a   Lyčka, Antonin ^b   Damyanova, Boryana ^a   Popov, Simeon ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY   (Bulgaria)

^b Vyzkumny ustav organickych syntez as   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AZO DYES; DATA HANDLING; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY;

'CURRENT; AZO-DYES; CHEMOMETRIC APPROACH; CHEMOMETRIC MODELING; SCHIFF-BASE; SPECTRAL APPROXIMATIONS; SPECTRAL DATA; TAUTOMERIC COMPOUNDS; TAUTOMERIC SYSTEMS; TAUTOMERICS;

ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY;

EID: 65649097277     PISSN: 13852728     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/138527209787314832     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Zincke, T.; Bindewald, H. Berichte, 1884, 17, 3026.
2. Baeyer, A.; Oekonomides, S. Berichte, 1882, 15, 2093.
3. Baeyer, A. Berichte, 1883, 16, 2188.
4. Laar, C. Berichte, 1885, 18, 648; 1886, 19, 730.
5. Michael, A. J. Prakt. Chem., 1887, 37, 473.
6. Clausen, L. Annalen, 1896, 291, 25.
7. The first spectral study of the tautomerism in I has been performed in 1935: Kuhn, R.; Bar, F. Annalen, 1935, 516, 143.
8. The word chemometric is exactly suited for the purposes of quantitative analysis of tautomeric mixtures, because it considers the strategies for extracting more information from the existing data sets. However we do not consider the details of the mathematical optimization procedures, assuming that they have been performed in the best possible way. More about these procedures can be found in the following books: Banday, B.D. Basic optimization methods, E. Arnold: London, 1984;
9. Gans, P. Data Fitting in the Chemical Sciences, Wiley: Amsterdam, 1992.
10. Kaminskii, Y.L.; Bershtein, I.Y.; Ginsburg, O.F. Dokl. Acad. Nauk SSSR, 1962, 145, 330;
11. Bershtein, I.Y.; Ginsburg, O.F. Usp. Khim., 1972, 41, 177.
12. Stoyanov, S.; Antonov, L. Dyes Pigm., 1988, 10, 33.
13. Elbergali, A.; Nygren, J.; Kubista, M. Anal. Chim. Acta, 1998, 379, 43;
14. Meloun, K.; Capek, J.; Miksik, P.; Brereton, R. Anal. Chim. Acta, 2000, 423, 51.
15. Kishimoto, S.; Kitahara, S.; Manabe, O.; Hiyama, H. J. Org. Chem., 1978, 43, 3882.
16. Antonov, L. Resolution of Overlapping Bands - Principle Approach and its Applications (PhD Thesis), University of Sofia: Sofia, 1994.
17. Herzfeld, R.; Nagy, P. Curr. Org. Chem., 2001, 5, 373.
18. Ospenson, J.N. Acta Chem. Scand., 1950, 4, 1352.
19. Sawicki, E. J. Org. Chem., 1956, 21, 605; 1957, 22, 743.
20. Simov, D.; Stojanov, S. J. Mol. Struct., 1973, 19, 255.
21. Hempel, R.; Viola, H.; Morgenstern, J.; Mayer, R. J. Prakt. Chem., 1976, 318, 983.
22. Antonov, L.; Nedeltcheva, D. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2000, 29, 217.
23. Rusling, J.F. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem., 1989, 21, 49.
24. Antonov, L.; Fabian, W.M.F.; Nedeltcheva, D.; Kamounah, F. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 2000, 1173.
25. Joshi, H.; Kamounah, F.S.; van der Zwan, G.; Gooijer, C.; Antonov, L. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 2001, 2303.
26. DATAN (MultiD Analyses AB), is a NIPALS based optimization package specially developed for analysis of various equilibria depending on the T, pH or concentration.
27. Iijima, T.; Jojima, E.; Antonov, L.; Stoyanov, S.; Stoyanova, T. Dyes Pigm., 1998, 37, 81.
28. Barker, B.E.; Fox, M.F. Chem. Soc. Rev., 1980, 9, 143 and references therein
29. Metzler, D.E.; Harris, C.M.; Johnson, R.J.; Siano, D.B.; Thomson, J.A. Biochemistry, 1973, 12, 5377.
30. Reeves, R.L.; Maggio, M.S.; Costa, L.F. JACS, 1974, 96, 5917.
31. Here, we should make a solvent related remark. In the analysis of tautomeric equilibria, especially in azo dyes and Schiff bases, achieving substantial shift in the equilibrium position by changing solvent composition is the most popular and wide-used method. The changes in solution achieved by temperature elevation are more than moderate in the temperature range available for UV-Vis spectroscopy (from 10 to 100°C depending on the solvent) and hence difficult to interpret. However the use of the solvent composition as a factor affecting the equilibrium brings problems in the quantitative processing of the beautiful pictures that are obtained, because the individual spectra of the tautomers are solvent dependent. Their solvent dependence has two aspects: (a) shape - solvent shift of the individual bands composing it; and/or (b) intensity - solvent influence on the corresponding oscillator strengths [19] and individual band areas. Our experience in the analysis of tautomeric azonaphthols and related Schiff bases [32-34, 21, 39] shows that there is evident solvatochromic shift in the positions of the longwavelength tautomeric bands (stronger for the K-ones) in the former [32-34], while in the latter no solvatochromism was observed in a wide set of solvents [21,39]. This means that at least in the case of Schiff bases it can be assumed that the individual band positions are solvent independent, i.e. the shape problem does not have substantial effect on the results. The intensity problem is not straightward - it is obvious that the probability of the electronic transitions (oscillator strength) depends on the solvent, but the effect is individual for the definite compounds. Hence, it is difficult to estimate the risk of the assumption for solvent independence of the oscillator strength.
32. Nishimura, N.; Danjo, K.; Sueishi, Y.; Yamamoto, S. Austr. J. Chem., 1988, 41, 863.
33. O'Shea, K.E.; Kirmse, K.M.; Fox, M.A.; Johnston, K.P. J. Phys. Chem., 1991, 95, 7863.
34. Antonov, L.; Stoyanov, S. Anal. Chim. Acta, 1995, 314, 225.
35. Stoyanov, S.; Antonov, L.; Soloveytchik, B.; Petrova, B. Dyes Pigm., 1994, 26, 149.
36. Antonov, L.; Stoyanov, S. Dyes Pigm., 1995, 27, 133.
37. Antonov, L.; Stoyanov, S. Dyes Pigm., 1995, 28, 31.
38. Antonov, L. Trends Anal. Chem., 1997, 16, 536.
39. Antonov, L.; Fabian, W.M.F.; Taylor, P.J. J. Phys. Org. Chem., 2005, 18, 1169.
40. Antonov, L.; Nedeltcheva, D. Anal. Lett., 1996, 29, 2055.
41. Antonov, L.; Petrov, V. Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2002, 374, 1312.
42. Fabian, W.M.F.; Antonov, L.; Nedeltcheva, D.; Kamounah, F.S.; Taylor, P.J. J. Phys. Chem., 2004, 108, 7603.
43. Marek, R.; Lyčka, A. Curr. Org. Chem., 2002, 7, 35.
44. Dudek, G.O.; Dudek, E.P. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1964, 86, 4283.
45. Dudek, G.O.; Dudek, E.P. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1966, 88, 2407.
46. Bekárek, V.; Rothshein, K.; Vetešník, P.; Večeřa, M. Tetrahedron Lett., 1968, 9, 3711.
47. Bekárek, V.; Dobáš, J.; Socha, J.; Vetešník, P.; Večeřa M. Coll. Czech. Chem. Commun., 1970, 35, 1406
48. Hull, Wo. In: Croasmun, W.R.; Carlson, R. M. K. (Eds.) Two-Dimensional NMR Spectroscopy. Applicatio for Chemists and Biochemists. Second ed., VCH Publishers, New York, 1994.
49. Braun, S.; Kalinowski, H.-O.; Berger S. 200 and More Basic NMR Experiments, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2004.
50. Kelemen, J.; Moss, S.; Sauter, H.; Winkler, T. Dyes Pigm., 1982, 3, 27.
51. Jacques, P.; Strup, H.; See, J.; Fleury J.P. Tetrahedron, 1979, 35, 2071.
52. Lyčka, A.; Šnobl, D.; Macháček, V.; Večeřa, M. Org. Magn. Reson., 1981, 15, 390
53. Claramunt, R.M.; Lopez, C.; Santa Maria, M.D.; Sanz, D.; Elguero, J. Progr. NMR Spectr., article in press (doi: 10.1016/ j.pnmrs.2006.07.001).
54. Alarcon, S.H.; Olivieri, A.C.; Sanz, D.; Claramunt, R.M.; Elguero J. J. Mol. Struct., 2004, 705, 1.
55. Salman, S.R.; Kamouhan, F.S. Spectroscopy, 2003, 17, 747.
56. 15N chemical shifts mentioned in this article are referred to external nitromethane and positive values denote shifts to higher frequency.
57. Lyčka, A.; Šnobl, D.; Macháček, V.; Večeřa, M. Org. Magn. Reson., 1981, 16, 17.
58. Lyčka, A. Annu. Rep. NMR Spectr., 1993, 26, 247.
59. Lyčka, A. Annu. Rep. NMR Spectr., 2000, 42, 1.
60. 17O NMR Spectroscopy in Organic Chemistry (Boykin, D.W., Ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton Fl., 1991.
61. Lippert, E.; Samuel, D.; Fischer, E. Ber. Bunsenges. Physik. Chem., 1965, 65, 155.
62. Reuben, J.; Samuel, D. Israel J. Chem., 1963, 1, 270.
63. Kamounah, F.S.; Antonov, L.; Petrov, V.; van der Zwan, G. J. Phys. Org. Chem., 2007, 20, 313.
64. Ogawa, K.; Harada, J.; Fujiwara T.; Yoshida; S. J. Phys. Chem., 2001, 105, 3425.
65. Schreiber, J.; Socha, J.; Rothschein, K. Coll. Czech. Chem. Commun., 1970, 35, 857.
66. Millefiori, S.; Zuccarello, F.; Millefiori, A.; Guerrera, F. Tetrahedron, 1973, 30, 735.
67. Shingu, H. Papers Inst. Phys. Chem. Res. (Tokyo), 1938, 35, 78.
68. Lyčka, A.; Macháček, V.; Dyes Pigm., 1986, 7, 171.
69. Burawoy, A.; Salem, A.G.; Thompson, A.R. J. Chem. Soc., 1952, 4793.
70. Lyčka, A.; Šnobl, D.; Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun., 1981, 46, 892.
71. Kamounah, F.; Salman, S. Spectr. Lett., 1996, 29, 659.
72. Nagy, P.; Herzfeld, R. Spectr. Lett., 1998, 31, 221.
73. Morgan, K.J. J. Chem. Soc., 1961, 2151.
74. Varges, V.; Amigo, L. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, 2001, 1124.
75. Folkendt, M.M.; Weiss-Lopez, B.E.; Chauvel, J.P.; True, N.S. J. Phys. Chem., 1985, 89, 3347.
76. Terent'ev, P.; Kalandarishvili, A. Mass Spectr. Rev., 1996, 15, 339.
77. Allegretti, P.E.; Milazzo, C.B.; Castro, E.A.; Furlong, J.J.P. J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem), 2002, 589-590, 161.
78. Masur, M.; Grutzmacker, H.F.; Munster, H.; Budzikiewicz, H. Org. Mass Spectrom., 1987, 22, 493.
79. Borgerding, A.J.; Hites, R.A. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 1994, 5, 407.
80. Kobayashi, K.; Kurihara, K.; Hirose, K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan, 1972, 45, 3551.
81. Kostyuchenko E.E.; Stepanov B.I. Zh. Org. Khim., 1980, 16, 2575.
82. Nedeltcheva, D.; Damyanova, B.; Popov, S. J. Mol. Struct., 2005, 479, 36.