Cortical potentials as predictors of outcomes with adult cochlear implant recipients - preliminary findings

Cochlear Implants International

Volumn 10, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2009, Pages 89-95

  Psarros, C ^a   Bate, K ^a   Sanli, H ^a   Amos, C ^a   Bray, M ^a   Stawski, R ^a  

^a Sydney Cochlear Implant Centre   (Australia)

Author keywords

Adult cochlear implant recipients; Cortical evoked potentials; Optimization of outcomes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COCHLEA; HEARING; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COCHLEA; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 65549154503     PISSN: 14670100     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cii.393     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Boothroyd A, Hanin L, Hnath T (1985) A sentence test of speech perception: Reliability, set equivalence and short term learning (Internal Report ICI 10). New York, NY, City University of New York.
2. Cox RM, Hyde M, Gatehouse S, Noble W, Dillon H, Bentler R, Stephens D, Arlinger S, Beck L, Wilkerson D, Kramer S, Kricos P, Gagne J, Bess F, Hallberg L (2000) Optimal outcome measures, research priorities and international cooperation. Ear and Hearing 21: 10S-15S.
3. Gibson WPR, Sanli H, Psarros C (2007) The use of intraoperative electrical auditory brainstem responses to predict the speech perception outcome after cochlear implantation. Paper presented at the 6th Asia Pacific Symposium on Cochlear Implants and Related Sciences, November 2007.
4. Kelly AS, Purdy SC, Thorne PR (2005) Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users. Clinical Neurophysiology 116: 1235-1246.
5. Kileny PR (2007) Evoked potentials in the management of patients with cochlear implants: research and clinical applications. Ear and Hearing 28(Supplement 2): 124S-127S.
6. Kileny PR, Zwolan TA, Zimmerman-Phillips S, Telian S (1994) Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in pediatric patients with cochlear implants. Archives of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 120(10): 1083-1090.
7. King JE, Polak M, Hodges AV, Payne S, Telischi FF (2006) Use of neural response telemetry measures to objectively set the comfort levels in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant. American Academy of Audiology 17(6): 413-431.
8. Kuo SCL, Gibson WPR (2002) The role of promontory stimulation in cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants International 10: 49-52.
9. Pedley K, Psarros C, Gardner-Berry K, Parker A, Purdy S, Dawson P, Plant K (2007) Evaluation of NRT and behavioral measures for MAPping elderly cochlear implant users. International Journal of Audiology 46(5): 254-262.
10. Peterson G, Lehiste I (1962) Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 27(1): 62-70.
11. Purdy SC, Katsch R, Dillon H, Storey L, Sharma M, Agung K (2005) Aided cortical auditory evoked potentials for hearing instrument evaluation in infants. In A Sound Foundation Through Early Amplification, pp 115-127. Chicago IL: Phonak AG.
12. Sharma A, Dorman M, Spahr AJ (2002) A sensitive period for the development of the central auditory system in children with cochlear implants: implications for age of implantation. Ear and Hearing 23: 532-539.
13. Wunderlich JL, Cone-Wesson BK (2006) Maturation of CAEP in infants and children: a review. Hearing Research 212: 212-223.