Feasibility of combining gait robot and multichannel functional electrical stimulation with intramuscular electrodes

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 45, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 997-1006

  McCabe, Jessica P ^a   Dohring, Mark E ^a   Marsolais, E Byron ^a,b   Rogers, Jean ^a   Burdsall, Richard ^a   Roenigk, Kristen ^a   Pundik, Svetlana ^a,b   Daly, Janis J ^a,b  

^a LOUIS STOKES CLEVELAND VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cerebrovascular accident; FES; Functional electrical stimulation; Gait; Gait robot; Gait training; Hemiplegia; Motor learning; Rehabilitation; Robotics; Stroke

Indexed keywords

CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; FES; FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; GAIT; GAIT ROBOT; GAIT TRAINING; HEMIPLEGIA; MOTOR LEARNING; REHABILITATION; STROKE;

ACCIDENTS; EDUCATION; ELECTRODES; MACHINE DESIGN; MOTORS; ROBOTICS; ROBOTS; SOFTWARE DESIGN; TECHNOLOGY; WALKING AIDS;

FUNCTIONAL ELECTRIC STIMULATION;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; GAIT; GAIT DISORDER; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTICS; STROKE; CONVALESCENCE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; INSTRUMENTATION; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE;

AGED; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; GAIT DISORDERS, NEUROLOGIC; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROBOTICS; STROKE;

EID: 65549124632     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: 07487711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2007.08.0124     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Daly JJ, Barnickle K, Kobetic R, Marsolais EB. Electrically induced gait changes post stroke, using an FNS system with intramuscular electrodes and multiple channels. J Neurol Rehabil.1993;7:17-25. (Pubitemid24772821)
2. Daly JJ, Ruff RL. Electrically induced recovery of gait components for older patients with chronic stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;79(4):349-360.
3. Daly JJ, Ruff RL. Feasibility of combining multi-channel functional neuromuscular stimulation with weight-supported treadmill training. J Neurol Sci. 2004;255(1-2):105-115.
4. Daly JJ, Roenigk KL, Butler KM, Gansen JL, Fredrickson E, Marsolais EB, Rogers J, Ruff RL. Response of sagittal plane gait kinematics to weight-supported treadmill training and functional neuromuscular stimulation following stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41(6A):807-820.
5. Daly JJ, Roenigk K, Rogers J, Butler K, Gansen J, McCabe JP. Response of chronic stroke subjects to FNS and weight supported gait training. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2004;28(4):175.
6. Daly JJ, Roenigk K, Holcomb J, Rogers JM, Butler K, Gansen J, McCabe J, Fredrickson E, Marsolais EB, Ruff RL. A randomized controlled trial of functional neuromuscular stimulation in chronic stroke subjects. Stroke. 2006;37(1):172-178.
7. O'Sullivan SB, Schmitz TJ. Physical rehabilitation. 5th ed. Philadelphia (PA): F.A. Davis Company; 2007.
8. Visintin M, Barbeau H. The effects of parallel bars, body weight support and speed on the modulation of the locomotor pattern of spastic paretic gait. A preliminary communication. Paraplegia. 1994;32(8):540-553.
9. Hesse S, Helm B, Krajnik J, Gregoric M, Mauritz KH. Treadmill training with partial body weight support: Influence of body weight release on the gait of hemiparetic patients. J Neurol Rehabil. 1997;11(1):15-20.
10. Trueblood PR. Partial body weight treadmill training in persons with chronic stroke. NeuroRehabilitation. 2001;16(3):141-153.
11. Husemann B, Müller F, Krewer C, Heller S, Koenig E. Effects of locomotion training with assistance of a robot-driven gait orthosis in hemiparetic patients after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Stroke. 2007;38(2):349-354.
12. Jezernik S, Colombo G, Keller T, Frueh H, Morari M. Robotic orthosis Lokomat: A rehabilitation and research tool. Neuromodulation. 2003;6(2):108-115
13. Kendall FP, EK McCreary, Provance PG, Rogers MM, Romani WA. Muscles: Testing and function with posture and pain. Baltimore (MD): Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
14. Scheiner A, Polando G, Marsolais EB. Design and clinical application of double helix electrode for functional electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1994;41(5):425-431.
15. Marsolais EB, Kobetic R. Implantation techniques and experience with percutaneous intramuscular electrodes in the lower extremities. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1986;23(3):1-8.
16. Daly JJ, Kollar K, Debogorski AA, Strasshofer B, Marsolais EB, Scheiner A, Snyder S, Ruff RL. Performance of an intramuscular electrode during functional neuromuscular stimulation for gait training post stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001;38(5):513-526.
17. Borges G, Ferguson K, Kobetic R. Development and operation of portable and laboratory electrical stimulation systems for walking in paraplegic subjects. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1989;36(7):798-801.
18. Daly JJ, Nethery J, McCabe JP, Rogers J, Brenner I, Gansen J. Gait Assessment and Intervention Tool (G.A.I.T.). For measurement of coordinated gait components. Physiotherapy. 2007;93 Suppl 1:356.
19. Hidler JM, Wall AE. Alterations in muscle activation patterns during robotic-assisted walking. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005;20(2):184-193.
20. Plautz EJ, Milliken GW, Nudo RJ. Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: role of use versus learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2000;74(1):27-55.
21. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: Translating research into clinical practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
22. Neumann DA. Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system: Foundations for physical rehabilitation. St. Louis (MO): Mosby; 2002.
23. Colombo G, Joerg M, Schreier R, Dietz V. Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37(6):693-700.