Colonoscopy quality assessment;Valoración de la calidad en la práctica de la colonoscopia

Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas

Volumn 101, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 107-116

  Morán Sánchez, Senador ^a,f   Torrella, E ^b   Esteban Delgado, P ^b   Banos Madrid R ^c   Garcia A ^d   Ono, A ^c   Perez Cuadrado E ^b   Parra, P ^e   Cruzado Quevedo, J ^e   Perez Riquelme F ^e   Carballo Alvarez F ^c  

^a Hospital Universitario Santa Maria del Rosell   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL MORALES MESEGUER   (Spain)

^c HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO VIRGEN DE LA ARRIXACA   (Spain)

^d HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO REINA SOFÍA   (Spain)

^e Centro Tecnológico de Información y Documentación Sanitaria   (Spain)

^f Allergy Section   (Spain)

Author keywords

Colonoscopy; Endoscopy; Quality; Quality indicators

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; CECUM; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; COLORECTAL CANCER; DIGESTIVE TRACT INTUBATION; EVALUATION; HEALTH CENTER; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OCCULT BLOOD TEST; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY CONTROL; RELIABILITY; SAMPLE; COLON POLYP; COLORECTAL TUMOR; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HYPERPLASIA; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; OCCULT BLOOD; PATHOLOGY; PREOPERATIVE CARE; SPAIN; STANDARD; TIME;

LAXATIVE;

CATHARTICS; CECUM; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; HUMANS; HYPERPLASIA; MASS SCREENING; OCCULT BLOOD; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; SPAIN; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 65549097711     PISSN: 11300108     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4321/S1130-01082009000200004     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Características de los indicadores clínicos. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Control de Calidad Asistencial 1991; 6(3): 65-74.
2. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, Chak A, Cohen J, Deal SE, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63(4 Supl.): S16-28.
3. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, Levin TR, Burt RW, Johnson DA, et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1296-1308 (Pubitemid 34664769)
4. Lieberman D. Quality and colonoscopy: a new imperative. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 392-394
5. Faigel DO, Pike IM, Baron TH, Chak A, Cohen J, Deal SE, et al; ASGE/ACG Taskforce on Quality in Endoscopy. Quality indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: an introduction. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 866-872
6. Bowles CJA, Leicester R, Romaya C, Swarbrick E, Williams CB, Epstein O. A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? Gut 2004; 53: 277-283
7. Levin TR, Farraye FA, Schoen RE, Hoff G, Atkin W, Bond JH, et al. Quality in the technical performance of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: recommendations of an international multi-society task group. Gut 2005; 54: 807-813 (Pubitemid 40732098)
8. Atkin W, Rogers P, Cardwell C, et al. Wide variation in adenoma detection rates at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 1247-1256 (Pubitemid 38552789)
9. Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, et al. Results of repeat sigmoidoscopy 3 years after a negative examination. JAMA 2003; 290: 41-48 (Pubitemid 37432864)
10. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 24-28
11. Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, et al. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141: 352-359
12. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Vinden C, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates for right-sided colon cancer: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 452-456 (Pubitemid 39091893)
13. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 1365-1371
14. Ransohoff DF. Colon cancer screening in 2005: status and challenges. Gastroenterology 2005; 128: 1685-1695
15. Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, Larkin GN, Rogge JD, Ransohoff DF. Results of screening colonoscopy among persons 40 to 49 years of age. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 1781-1785 (Pubitemid 34586913)
16. Mandel JS, Church TR, Bond JH, Ederer F, Geisser MS, Mongin SJ, et al. The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorrectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1603-1607 (Pubitemid 32162983)
17. Castells A, Marzo M, Bellas B, Amador FJ, Lanas A, Mascort JJ, et al. Clinical guidelines for the prevention of colorectal cancer. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 27: 573-634. (Pubitemid 40039154)
18. Rex DK, ACG Board of Trustees. American College of Gastroenterology action plan for colorectal cancer prevention. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 574-577
19. Jorgensen OD, Kronborg O, Fenger C. A randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer using faecal occult blood testing: results after 13 years and seven biennial screening rounds. Gut 2002; 50: 29-32. (Pubitemid 34028299)
20. Saturno PJ. Evaluación y Mejora de la Calidad en Servicios de Salud. Conceptos y Métodos. Murcia: Consejería de Sanidad y Consumo de la Región de Murcia; 2000.
21. Saturno PJ, Quintana O, Varo J. ¿Qué es calidad? En: Tratado de Calidad Asistencial en Atención Primaria. Madrid: Dupont Pharma; 1997. p. 17-45.
22. Plan de Salud 2003-2007. Región de Murcia. Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad Autónoma de la Región de Murcia; 2003.
23. Harewood Gc, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 76-79 (Pubitemid 38208751)
24. Froelich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European Multicenter Study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 378-384 (Pubitemid 40349029)
25. Marshall JB, Barthel JS. The frequency of total colonoscopy and terminal ileal intubation in the 1990s. Gastrointest Endosc 1993; 39: 518-520
26. Rex DK. Still photography versus videotaping for documentation of cecal intubation: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 451-459
27. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 162-168 (Pubitemid 30489212)
28. Pabby A, Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL, et al. Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 385-391 (Pubitemid 40349030)
29. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1977-1981
30. Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, Bond J, Burt R, Ferrucci J, et al.; Gastrointestinal Consortium Panel. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 2003; 124: 544-560
31. Citarda F, Tomaselli G, Capocaccia R, et al. Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence. Gut 2001; 48: 812-815 (Pubitemid 32476984)
32. Williams C. Insertion technique. In: Waye J, Rex D, Williams C, editors. Colonoscopy: principles and practice. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2003. p. 318-338
33. Barclay R, Vicari JJ, Johanson JF, et al. Variation in adenoma detection rates and colonoscopic withdrawal times during screening colonoscopy [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: AB107.
34. Rex DK. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 51: 33-36
35. Simmons DT, Harewood GC, Baron TH, Petersen BT, Wang KK, Boyd-Enders F, et al. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 24: 965-971 (Pubitemid 44326377)
36. Lieberman D. Quality and colonoscopy: a new imperative. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 392-394
37. Rex DK. Quality in colonoscopy: cecal intubation first, then what? Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 732-734
38. Navarro M, Peris M, Binefa G, Nogueira JM, Miquel JM, Espinás JA, Catalan Colorectal Cancer Screening Pilot Programme Group. Colonoscopic findings from a pilot screening study for colorectal cancer in Catalonia. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2008; 100: 343-348