Basic-level kinds and object persistence

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 292-301

  Rhemtulla, Mijke ^a   Hall, D Geoffrey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONCEPT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NOMENCLATURE; NORMAL HUMAN; CONCEPT FORMATION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION DISORDER; RECALL; SEMANTICS;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CONCEPT FORMATION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; SEMANTICS;

EID: 65549089699     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/MC.37.3.292     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. BLOK, S., NEWMAN, G., & RIPS, L. J. (2005). Individuals and their concepts. In W.-K. Ahn, R. L. Goldstone, B. C. Love, A. B. Markman, & P. Wolff (Eds.), Categorization inside and outside the lab (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. BLOOM, P. (2000). How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. BONATTI, L., FROT, E., ZANGL, R., & MEHLER, J. (2002). The human first hypothesis: Identification of conspecifics and individuation of objects in the young infant. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 388-426. (Pubitemid 39659790)
4. GELMAN, S. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. GENTNER, D., LOEWENSTEIN, J., & HUNG, B. (2007). Comparison facilitates children's learning of names for parts. Journal of Cognition & Development, 8, 285-307. (Pubitemid 47490678)
6. GENTNER, D., & MARKMAN, A. B. (1994). Structural alignment in comparison: No difference without similarity. Psychological Science, 5, 152-158.
7. GENTNER, D., & MARKMAN, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52, 45-56. (Pubitemid 127458598)
8. GENTNER, D., & MEDINA, J. (1998). Similarity and the development of rules. Cognition, 65, 263-297. (Pubitemid 128413235)
9. GENTNER, D., & NAMY, L. L. (2006). Analogical processes in language learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 297-301. (Pubitemid 44952727)
10. GLASS, G. V., PECKHAM, P. D., & SANDERS, J. R. (1972). Consequences of failure to meet assumptions underlying the fixed effects analyses of variance and covariance. Review of Educational Research, 42, 237-288.
11. HALL, D. G. (1998). Continuity and the persistence of objects: When the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. Cognitive Psychology, 37, 28-59. (Pubitemid 128428613)
12. HIRSCH, E. (1982). The concept of identity. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. KLIBANOFF, R. S., & WAXMAN, S. R. (2000). Basic level object categories support the acquisition of novel adjectives: Evidence from preschool-aged children. Child Development, 71, 649-659.
14. LANDIS, J. R., & KOCH, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174. (Pubitemid 8054849)
15. LIITTSCHWAGER, J. C. (1995). Children's reasoning about identity across transformations (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International, 55, 4623B.
16. MACNAMARA, J. (1986). A border dispute: The place of logic in psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. MANDERS, K., & HALL, D. G. (2002). Comparison, basic-level categories, and the teaching of adjectives. Journal of Child Language, 29, 923-937.
18. MARKMAN, A. B., & GENTNER, D. (1993). Structural alignment during similarity comparisons. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 431-467.
19. MARKMAN, A. B., & WISNIEWSKI, E. J. (1997). Similar and different: The differentiation of basic-level categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 54-70. (Pubitemid 127020917)
20. MEDIN, D. L., GOLDSTONE, R. L., & GENTNER, D. (1993). Respects for similarity. Psychological Review, 100, 254-278.
21. RHEMTULLA, M., & XU, F. (2007). Sortal concepts and causal continuity: Comment on Rips, Blok, & Newman (2006). Psychological Review, 114, 1087-1094.
22. RIPS, L. J., BLOK, S., & NEWMAN, G. (2006). Tracing the identity of objects. Psychological Review, 113, 1-30. (Pubitemid 43283708)
23. STILL, A. W., & WHITE, A. P. (1981). The approximate randomization test as an alternative to the F test in analysis of variance. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 34, 243-252.
24. WAXMAN, S. R., & KLIBANOFF, R. S. (2000). The role of comparison in the extension of novel adjectives. Developmental Psychology, 36, 571-581.
25. WIGGINS, D. (2001). Sameness and substance renewed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. XU, F. (1997). From Lot's wife to a pillar of salt: Evidence that physical object is a sortal concept. Mind & Language, 12, 365-392. (Pubitemid 127364691)
27. XU, F., & CAREY, S. (1996). Infants' metaphysics: The case of numerical identity. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 111-153. (Pubitemid 126375449)
28. XU, F., COTE, M., & BAKER, A. (2005). Labeling guides object individuation in 12-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 16, 372-377. (Pubitemid 40763683)