A single-case study on the process and outcome of psychoanalysis

Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 105-113

  Szecsödy, Imre ^a  

^a NONE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Mentalization reflective functioning; Outcome process study; Psychotherapy research

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR DISORDER; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; RATING SCALE;

EID: 65449181953     PISSN: 01062301     EISSN: 16000803     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01062301.2008.10592838     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Benjamin, L. (1974). Structural analysis of social behaviour. Psychological Review, 81: 392-425.
2. Blatt, S. J. and Auerbach, J. S. (2001). Mental representations, severe psychopathology, and the therapeutic process. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 49: 113-159.
3. Bucci, W. (2001). Toward a “Psychodynamic Science”: The State of Current Research. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn, 49: 57-68.
4. Derogatis, L.R., Lipman, R.S., Rickels, K., Uhlenhuth, E.H. and Covi, L. (1974). The Hopkins symptom checklist (HSCL): A self-report symptom inventory. Behavioral Science, 19: 1-15.
5. Fonagy, P., Steele, M., Steele, H., Leigh T., Kennedy, R., Mattoon, G. and Target M.(1995). Attachment, the reflective self, and borderline States. The predictive specificity of Adult Attachment Interview and pathological emotional development. In: Goldberg, S., Muir, R. and Kerr, J. (eds.) Attachment theory. Social, developmental and clinical perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ and London: The Analytic Press.
6. Fonagy, P., Leigh, T. Steele, M. Steele, H. Kennedy, R. Mattoon, G. Target, M. and Gerber, A. (1996). The relation of attachment status, psychiatric classification, and response to psychotherapy. J. Abnorm. Psychol., 64: 22-31.
7. Fonagy, P., Steele, M., Steele, H., Leigh T. and Target, M. (1997). Reflective - Functioning Manual. Version 4.1; (for application of adult attachment manual) London: University College.
8. Fonagy, P., Allison, L., Clarkin, J.F., Jones, E.E., Kachele, H, Krause, R., Lopez, D.and Perron, R. (eds.) (2002). An open door review of the outcome of psychoanalysis. London: International Psychoanalytic Association.
9. George, C., Kaplan, N. and Main, M. (1996). Adult attachment interview. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Psychology. University of California Berkeley.
10. Horowitz, L.M., Rosenberg, S.E. and Baer, B.A. (1988). Inventory of interpersonal problems: psychometric properties and linical applications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56: 885-892.
11. Jimenez, J.P., Kachele, H. and Pokorny, D. (2006). The psychoanalytic loss-separation model (LSM): evolution of the reaction to breaks in the psychoanalytical process as an indicator of change. Int. J. Psychotherapy, 10: 22-34.
12. Kachele, H., Albani, C., Buchheim, A., Hólzer, M., Hohage, R., Jiménez, J.P., Leuzinger-Bohleber, M., Mergentha- ler, E., Neudert-Dreyer, L., Pokorny, D. and Thomá, H. (2006). The German specimen case Amalia X: Empirical studies. Int. J. Psychoanalysis, 87: 809-826.
13. Main, M. (1993). Discourse, prediction, and recent studies in attachment: implications for psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 41S: 209-244.
14. Main, M. and Goldwyn, R. (in press). Adult attachment classification system. In: M. Main (ed.) Behaviour and development of representational models of attachment: five methods of assessment Cambridge University Press.
15. Sandell, R., Blomberg, J., Lazar, A., Carlsson, J., Broberg, J, and Schubert, J. (2000). Varieties of long-term outcome among patients in psychoanalysis and long-term psycho-therapy. A review of findings in the Stockholm Outcome of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy Project (STOPPP). Int. J. Psychoanal., 81:921-942.
16. Schafer, R. (1960) The loving and beloved superego in Freud’s structuraltheory.Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 15: 163-188.