Toward a “Psychodynamic Science”: The State of Current Research

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 57-68

  Bucci, Wilma ^a  

^a ADELPHI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CULTURAL FACTOR; HUMAN; PSYCHOANALYSIS; RESEARCH; SELF CONCEPT;

CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; HUMANS; PSYCHOANALYSIS; RESEARCH; SELF CONCEPT;

EID: 0035653137     PISSN: 00030651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00030651010490010401     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ainsworth, M.D.S., Blehar, M.C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Bailey, K.E., Greer, J.M., Bucci, W., & Mergenthaler, E. (1998). What do process notes contain? An empirical test of data equivalence between transcribed tape recordings and psychoanalytic process notes using computerized text analysis procedures. Paper presented to the American Psychoanalytic Association, New York, December.
3. Bucci, W. (1997). Psychoanalysis and Cognitive Science: A Multiple Code Theory. New York: Guilford Press.
4. Bucci, W. (2000). The need for a “psychoanalytic psychology ” in the cognitive science field. Psychoanalytic Psychology 17: 203–224.
5. Dahl, H., Kächele, H., & Thomä, H., EDS. (1988). Psychoanalytic Process Research Strategies. New York: Springer-Verlag.
6. Freud, S. (1918). From the history of an infantile neurosis. Standard Edition 17: 1–103.
7. Kernberg, O.F. (1995). Discussion: Empirical research in psychoanalysis. In Research in Psychoanalysis: Process, Development, Outcome, ed. T. Shapiro & R.N. Emde Madison, CT: International Universities Press, pp. 369–380.
8. Kline, P. (1981). Fact and Fantasy in Freudian Theory. 2nd ed. New York: Methuen.
9. Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood and aduldhood: A move to the level of representation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 50 (1–2, Serial No. 209).
10. Michels, R. (2000). The case history. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 48: 355–366; 417–420.
11. Miller, N.E., Luborsky, L., Barber, J.P., & Docherty, J.P., EDS. (1993). Psychodynamic Treatment Research: A Handbook for Clinical Practice. New York: Basic Books.
12. Scharff, J.S. (2000). On writing from clinical experience. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 48: 421–447.
13. Shapiro, T., & Emde, R.N., EDS. (1995). Research in Psychoanalysis: Process, Development, Outcome. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
14. Szecsödy, I. (2000). Commentary on Michels's “The case history.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 48: 397–403.
15. Thomä, H., & Kächele, H. (1975). Problems of metascience and methodology in clinical psychoanalytic research. Annual of Psychoanalysis 3: 49–119.
16. Tuckett, D. (1993). Some thoughts on the presentation and discussion of the clinical material of psychoanalysis. International Journal of PsychoAnalysis 74: 1175–1188.
17. Tuckett, D. (2000). Commentary on Michels's “The case history.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 48: 403–411.