Breeding habitat selection behaviors in heterogeneous environments: Implications for modeling reintroduction

Oikos

Volumn 118, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 663-674

  Mihoub, Jean Baptiste ^a   Le Gouar, Pascaline ^a,b   Sarrazin, François ^a  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AVOIDANCE REACTION; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; CONSPECIFIC; ENVIRONMENTAL CUE; HABITAT QUALITY; HABITAT SELECTION; HETEROGENEITY; MOVEMENT; NEST SITE; PERSISTENCE; POPULATION MODELING; REINTRODUCTION; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; RESTORATION ECOLOGY;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 65449180742     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17142.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Arlt, D. Part, T. 2007. Nonideal breeding habitat selection: a mismatch between preference and fitness Ecology 88 : 792 801. (Pubitemid 46597085)
2. Armstrong, D. P. Seddon, P. J. 2008. Directions in reintroduction biology Trends Ecol. Evol. 23 : 20 25.
3. Armstrong, D. P. et al. 2005. Density-dependent population growth in a reintroduced population of North Island saddlebacks J. Anim. Ecol. 74 : 160 170. (Pubitemid 40252749)
4. Baguette, M. Stevens, V. M. 2003. Local populations and metapopulations are both natural and operationnal categories Oikos 101 : 661 663. (Pubitemid 36599490)
5. Bar-David, S. et al. 2005. Predicting the spatial dynamics of a reintroduced population: the Persian fallow deer Ecol. Appl. 15 : 1833 1846. (Pubitemid 41408050)
6. Beck, B. B. et al. 1994. Reintroduction of captive-born animals Olney, P. J. S. Creative conservation: interactive management of wild and captive animals. Chapman and Hall 265 286.
7. Boulinier, T. Danchin, E. 1997. The use of conspecific reproductive success for breeding patch selection in terrestrial migratory species Evol. Ecol. 11 : 505 517. (Pubitemid 27393220)
8. Bowler, D. E. Benton, T. G. 2005. Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics Biol. Rev. 80 : 205 225. (Pubitemid 40716062)
9. Caswell, H. 2001. Matrix population models, 2nd ed. Sinauer.
10. Charnov, E. L. 1976. Optimal foraging, marginal value theorem Theor. Popul. Biol. 9 : 129 136.
11. Citta, J. J. Lindberg, M. S. 2007. Nest-site selection of passerines: effect of geographic scale and public and personnal information Ecology 88 : 2034 2046.
12. Cramer, P. C. Portier, K. M. 2001. Modelling Florida panther movements in response to human attributes of the landscape and ecological settings Ecol. Modell. 140 : 51 80. (Pubitemid 33648542)
13. Danchin, E. et al. 2004. Public information: from nosy neighbors to cultural evolution Science 305 : 487 491. (Pubitemid 38971332)
14. Davis, J. M. Stamps, J. A. 2004. The effect of natal experience on habitat preferences Trends Ecol. Evol. 19 : 411 416. (Pubitemid 38991666)
15. Delibes, M. et al. 2001. Effect of an attractive sink leading into maladaptative habitat selection Am. Nat. 158 : 277 285. (Pubitemid 32792197)
16. Doligez, B. et al. 2003. When to use public information for breeding habitat selection? The role of environmental predictability and density dependence Anim. Behav. 66 : 973 988. (Pubitemid 37457993)
17. Fletcher Jr., R. J. 2006. Emergent properties of conspecific attraction in fragmented landscapes Am. Nat. 168 : 207 219. (Pubitemid 44246216)
18. Frean, M. R. 1994. The prisoners-dilemma without synchrony Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 257 : 75 79.
19. Fretwell, S. D. Lucas Jr., H. L. 1970. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development Acta Biotheor. 19 : 16 36.
20. Gardner, R. H. Gustafson, E. J. 2004. Simulating dispersal of reintroduced species within heterogeneous landscapes Ecol. Modell. 171 : 339 358. (Pubitemid 38203878)
21. Griffith, B. et al. 1989. Translocation as a species conservation tool: status and strategy Science 245 : 477 480. (Pubitemid 20421351)
22. Hancock, P. A. Milner-Gulland, E. J. 2006. Optimal movement strategies for social foragers in unpredictable environments Ecology 87 : 2094 2102. (Pubitemid 44215734)
23. Johnson, M. D. 2007. Measuring habitat quality: a review Condor 109 : 489 504. (Pubitemid 47359679)
24. Kleiman, D. G. 1989. Reintroduction of captive mammals for conservation Bioscience 39 : 152 161.
25. Kokko, H. Sutherland, W. J. 2001. Ecological traps in changing environments: ecological and evolutionary consequences of behaviourally mediated Allee effect Evol. Ecol. Res. 3 : 537 551. (Pubitemid 33614406)
26. Kristan, W. B. 2003. The role of habitat selection behavior in population dynamics: source-sink systems and ecological traps Oikos 103 : 457 468. (Pubitemid 37435860)
27. Lancaster, J. et al. 2003. Linking landscape patterns of resource distribution with models of aggregation in ovipositing stream insects J. Anim. Ecol. 72 : 969 978. (Pubitemid 37435480)
28. Legendre, S. Clobert, J. 1995. ULM, a software for conservation and evolutionary biologists J. Appl. Stat. 22 : 817 834.
29. Legendre, S. et al. 1999. Demographic stochasticity and social mating system in the process of extinction of small populations: the case of passerines introduced to New Zealand Am. Nat. 153 : 449 463. (Pubitemid 29285411)
30. Møller, A. P. 1994. Sexual selection and the barn swallow. Oxford Univ. Press.
31. Mueller, T. Fagan, W. F. 2008. Search and navigation in dynamic environments - from individual behaviors to population distributions Oikos 117 : 654 664.
32. Muller, K. L. et al. 1997. The effects of conspecific attraction and habitat quality on habitat selection in territorial birds (Troglodytes aedon) Am. Nat. 150 : 650 661. (Pubitemid 127738311)
33. Pulliam, H. R. Danielson, B. J. 1991. Source, sinks and habitat selction: a landscape perspective on population dynamics Am. Nat. 137 : S50 S66.
34. Railsback, S. F. et al. 2003. What can habitat preference models tell us? Tests using a virtual trout population Ecology 13 : 1580 1594. (Pubitemid 38362236)
35. Ray, C. Gilpin, M. E. 1991. The effect of conspecific attraction on metapopulation dynamics Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 42 : 123 134.
36. Reed, M. J. Dobson, A. P. 1993. Behavioural constraints and conservation biology: conspecific attraction and recruitment Trends Ecol. Evol. 8 : 253 256. (Pubitemid 223004788)
37. Robert, A. et al. 2004. Releasing adults versus young in reintroductions: interactions between demography and genetics Conserv. Biol. 18 : 1078 1087. (Pubitemid 39059162)
38. Ruckelshaus, M. et al. 1997. Assessing the data requirements of spatially explicit dispersal models Conserv. Biol. 11 : 1298 1306. (Pubitemid 28017351)
39. Sarrazin, F. 1998. Modelling establishment of a reintroduced population of griffon vulture Gyps fulvus in southern France Chancellor, R. D. Holartic birds of prey. Proc. Int. Conf. ADENEX-WWGBP 405 416.
40. Sarrazin, F. Barbault, R. 1996. Reintroduction: challenges and lessons for basic ecology Trends Ecol. Evol. 11 : 474 478. (Pubitemid 126409743)
41. Sarrazin, F. Legendre, S. 2000. Demographic approach to releasing adult versus young in reintroductions Conserv. Biol. 14 : 488 500. (Pubitemid 30221262)
42. Sarrazin, F. et al. 1994. High survival estimates of griffon vultures (Gyps fulvus fulvus) in a reintroduced population Auk 111 : 853 862.
43. Sarrazin, F. et al. 1996. Breeding biology during establishment of a reintroduced griffon vulture Gyps fulvus population Ibis 138 : 315 325. (Pubitemid 126566704)
44. Schaub, M. et al. 2004. Is the reintroduced white stork (Ciconia ciconia) population in Switzerland self-sustainable? Biol. Conserv. 119 : 105 114. (Pubitemid 38708860)
45. Schmidt, K. A. 2004. Site fidelity in temporally correlated environments enhances population persistence Ecol. Lett. 7 : 176 184. (Pubitemid 38370271)
46. Sedgwick, J. A. 2004. Site fidelity, territory fidelity, and natal philopatry in willow flycatchers (Empidonax traillii) Auk 121 : 1103 1121. (Pubitemid 39455341)
47. Serrano, D. Tella, J. L. 2007. The role of despotism and heritability in determining settlement patterns in the colonial lesser kestrel Am. Nat. 169 : E53 E67.
48. South, A. 1999. Dispersal in spatially explicit population models Conserv. Biol. 13 : 1039 1046. (Pubitemid 29475535)
49. Sutherland, W. J. Norris, K. 2002. Behavioural models of population growth rates: implications for conservation and prediction Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 357 : 1273 1284.
50. Travis, J. M. J. French, D. R. 2000. Dispersal functions and spatial models: expanding our dispersal toolbox Ecol. Lett. 3 : 163 165. (Pubitemid 30334114)
51. Valone, T. J. Giraldeau, L.-A. 1993. Patch estimation by group foragers: what information is used? Anim. Behav. 45 : 721 728. (Pubitemid 223020842)
52. Valone, T. J. Templeton, J. J. 2002. Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 257 : 1549 1557. (Pubitemid 35442099)
53. Veit, R. R. Lewis, M. A. 1996. Dispersal, population growth, and the Allee effect: dynamics of the house finch invasion of eastern North America Am. Nat. 148 : 255 274. (Pubitemid 26368333)
54. Wiegand, T. et al. 2004. Dealing with uncertainty in spatially explicit population models Biodiv. Conserv. 13 : 53 78. (Pubitemid 38157737)