Local populations and metapopulations are both natural and operational categories

Oikos

Volumn 101, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 661-663

  Baguette, Michel ^a   Stevens, Virginie M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037841899     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12539.x     Document Type: Note

References (20)

1. Akçakaya, H. R. and Sjögren-Gulve, P. 2000. Population viability analyses in conservation planning: an overview. - Ecol. Bull. 48: 9-21.
2. Baguette, M., Mennechez, G., Petit, S. and Schtickzelle, N., in press. Effect of fragmentation on dispersal in the butterfly Proclossiana eunomia. - C. R. Biol.
3. Berryman, A. A. 2002. Population: a central concept for ecology. - Oikos 97: 439-442.
4. Camus, P. A. and Lima, M. 2002. Populations, metapopulations, and the open-closed dilemma: the conflict between operational and natural population concepts. - Oikos 97: 433-438.
5. Gilpin, M. and Hanski, I. 1991. Metapopulation dynamics: empirical and theoretical investigations. Academic Press, London.
6. Hanski, I. 1991. Single-species metapopulation dynamics: concepts models and observations. - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 42: 17-38.
7. Hanski, I. 1999. Metapopulation ecology. - Oxford Univ. Press.
8. Hanski, I. 2001. Spatially realistic theory of metapopulation ecology. Naturwissenschaften 88: 372-381.
9. Hanski, I. and Gilpin, M. 1997. Metapopulation biology, ecology, genetics, and evolution. - Academic Press.
10. Hanski, I. and Simberloff, D. 1997. The metapopulation approach. - In: Hanski, I. and Gilpin, M. (eds), Metapopulation biology, ecology, genetics and evolution. Academic Press, pp. 5-26.
11. Levins, R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. - Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 15: 237-240.
12. Matter, S. F., Hanski, L. and Gyllenberg, M. 2002. A test of the metapopulation model of the species-area relationship. - J. Biogeogr. 29: 977-983.
13. Mayr, E. 1970. Populations, species and evolution. - Harvard Univ. Press.
14. Mennechez G., Schtickzelle N. and Baguette M., in press. Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: comparison of demographic parameters and dispersal between a highly fragmented and a continuous landscape, Landscape Ecol.
15. Nekola, J. C. and Kraft, C. E. 2002. Spatial constraint of peatland butterfly occurrences within a heterogeneous landscape. - Oecologia 130: 53-61.
16. Schöps, K. 2002. Local and regional dynamics of a specialist herbivore: overexploitation of a patchily distributed host plant. - Oecologia 132: 256-263.
17. Stevens, V. M., Wesselingh, R. A. and Baguette, M., in press. Demographic processes in a small isolated population of Natterjack toads (Bufo calamita) in Southern Belgium. Herpetol. J.
18. Stevens, V. M., Wesselingh, R. A. and Baguette, M., 2002. Traits d'histoire de vie dans une population de crapauds calamites, Bufo calamita (Anura: Bufonidae) en Brabant wallon. - Bull. Soc. Herpetol. Fr. 104: 34-53.
19. Thomas, C. D. and Kunin, W. E. 1999. The spatial structure of populations. - J. Anim. Ecol. 68: 647-657.
20. Wright, S. 1943. Isolation by distance. - Genetics 28: 114-138.