Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) from a radiological and astroenterological;Magnetresonanz-cholangiopankreatikographie (MRCP) aus radiologischem und gastroenterologischem Blickwinkel

Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift

Volumn 134, Issue 19, 2009, Pages 1011-1014

  Vogl, T J ^a   Zeuzem, S ^a   Zangos, S ^a   Hammerstingl, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FRANKFURT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cholangiocarcinoma; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP); Klatskin's tumor; Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP)

Indexed keywords

FERUMOXSIL; SECRETIN; SPASMOLYTIC AGENT;

BILE DUCT CARCINOMA; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CAROLI DISEASE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; HUMAN; KLATSKIN TUMOR; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; NOTE; PANCREATITIS; PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ARTICLE; BILIARY TRACT DISEASE; PANCREAS DISEASE;

BILIARY TRACT DISEASES; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, MAGNETIC RESONANCE; HUMANS; PANCREATIC DISEASES;

EID: 65449175353     PISSN: 00120472     EISSN: 14394413     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1222562     Document Type: Note

References (21)

1. Chavhan GB, Roberts E, Moineddin R Babyn PS, Manson DE. Primary sclerosing cholangitis in children: utility of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography. Pediatr Radiol 2008; 38 (8): 868-73
2. Courbiere M, Pilluel F, Henry L, Pinchon T, Touzet S, Valette PJ. Value of magnetic resonance cholangiography in benign and malignant biliary stenosis: comparative study with direct cholangiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003; 27: 315-320
3. De Waele E Op de Beeck B, De Waele B, Delvaux G. Magnetic resonance cholangiopan-creaticography in the preoperative assessment of patients with biliary pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2007; 7: 347-351
4. Freeman ML Adverse outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: avoidance and management. Gastrointest Endoscopy Clin N Am 2003; 13: 775-798
5. Freeman ML DiSario JA, Nelson DB et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: A prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 425-434
6. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Franklin KJetal. Primary sclerosing cholangitis: evaluation with MR cholangiography - a case control study. Radiology 2000; 215: 71-80
7. Gaa J, Wendl K, Tesdal IK et al. Combined use of MRI and MR cholangiopancreatography and contrast enhanced dual phase 3-D MR angiography in diagnosis of pancreatic tumors: Initial clinical results [Article in German]. Fortsch Geb Roentgenstr 1999; 170 (6): 528-33
8. HeverhagenJT, Battmann A, Kirsch M, Eissele R Klose KJ, Wagner H-J. Sekretinstimulierte Magnetresonanzcholangiopankreatikogra-phie: Darstellung des normalen Pankreasgangs im Vergleich zur ERCP. Fortschr Rö ntgenstr 2002; 174: 1154-1157
9. Holzapfel K, Breitwieser C, Prinz C, Rummeny EJ, Gaa J. Kontrastverstä rkte MR-Cholangio-graphie mit Gadolinium-EOB-DTPA: Erste Erfahrungen und klinische Einsatzmö glichkeiten. Radiologe 2007; 47 (6): 536-44
10. Holzknecht N, Ganger J, Sackmann M et al.Breath-hold MR cholangiography with snapshot techniques: prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 1998; 206: 657-664
11. Innnicelli E, Sessa B, Argnani L Galluzzo A, David V. [Role of MR cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of biliary disease]. Clin Ter 2006; 157 (5): 425-429
12. Kim MJ, Mitchell DG, Ito K, Outwater EK. Biliary dilatation: differentiation of benign from malignant causes - value of adding conventional MR imaging to MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 2000; 214 (1): 173-81
13. Kim JY, Lee JM, Han JK et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI combined with MR cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of patients with biliary strictures: differentiation of mali gnant from benign bile duct strictures. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 26 (2): 304-12
14. Mangnuson T, Bender JS, Duncan MD, Ahrendt SA, Harmon JW, Regan F. Utility of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the evaluation of biliary obstruction. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 189: 63-71
15. Mofidi R Lee AC, Madhavan KK, Garden OJ, Parks RW. The selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the imaging of the axial biliary tree in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2008; 8: 55-60
16. Rosch T, Meining A, Fruhmorgen S et al. A prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of ERCP, MRCP, CT and EUS in biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 870-876
17. Tipnis NA, Werlin Si. The use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in children. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2007; 9: 225-229
18. Trap R Adamsen S, Hart-Hansen O et al. Severe and fatal complications after diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective series of claims to insurance covering public hospitals. Endoscopy 1999; 31: 125-130
19. Valls C, Alba E, Cruz M, Figueras J, ANdia E, Sanchez A, Llado L, Serrano T. Biliary Complications after Liver Transplantation: Diagnosis with MR Cholangiopancreatography. AJR 2005; 184: 812-820
20. Vogl TJ, Schwarz WO, Heller M, Herzog Q Zangos S, Hintze RE Neuhaus P, Hammerstingl RM. Staging of Klatskin tumours (hilar cholangio-carcinomas): comparison of MR cholangiography, MR imaging, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Eur Radiol 2006; 16 (10): 2317-25 Epub 2006 Apr 19
21. Wallnoefer A, Zech C, Hermann K et al. Image quality in the magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: Comparison of high-resolution 3D-TSE with parallel imaging techniques, 2D-Half-Fourier-single shot TSE (HASTE) and rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) sequences. Eur Radiol 2005; 15 (Suppl3): C38