A study of secondary spectrum use using agent-based computational economics

NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 125-151

  Tonmukayakul, Arnon ^a   Weiss, Martin B H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Agent; Secondary market; Spectrum management

Indexed keywords

EID: 65449170728     PISSN: 13859587     EISSN: 15737071     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11066-009-9032-7     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. David, R. J., & Han, S.-K. (2004). A systematic assessment of empirical support for transaction cost economics. Strategic Management Journal, 25(1), 39-58.
2. Federal Communications Commission (2002). Spectrum policy task force report. ET Docket No. 02-135. November.
3. Federal Communications Commission (2004). In the matter of promoting efficient use of spectrum through elimination of barriers to the development of secondary markets: Second report and order. FCC 04-167, WT Docket No. 00-230, September.
4. Friedman, D. (1991). The double auction market institution: A survey. In D. Friedman & J. Rust (Eds.), The double auction market: Institutions, theories, and evidence, reading. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
5. Grandblaise, D., Kloek, C., Moessner, K., Rodriguez, V., Mohyeldin, E., Pereirasamy, M. K., et al. (2005). Techon-economic of collaborative based secondary SPectrum usage - E 2 R research projects outcomes overview. In IEEE symposium on new frontiers in dynamic spectrum access networks DySPAN 05, November.
6. Kloek, C., Jackel, H., & Jondral, F. K. (2005). Dynamic and local combined pricing, allocation and billing system with cognitive radio. In IEEE symposium on new frontiers in dynamic spectrum access networks DySPAN 05, November.
7. Klos, T. B., & Nooteboom, B. (2001). Agent-based computational transaction cost economics. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 25 (3-4), 503-526.
8. Leese, R., Levine, P., & Rickman, N. (2002). The economic effects of spectrum trading. In Presented at the European economics association annual conference, August.
9. Lehr, W. (2004). The economic case for dedicated unlicensed spectrum below 3GHz. New America foundation spectrum series working paper no. 9, July.
10. Levine, P., Moessner, K., & Rickman, N. (2007). Spectrum property rights versus a commons model: Exploitation of mesh networks. Department of Economics working paper DP 06/07, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
11. McLaren, J. (2003). Trade and market thickness: Effects on organizations. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(2-3), 328-336.
12. North, M. J., Collier, N. T., & Vos, J. R. (2006). Experiences creating three implementations of the Repast agent modeling toolkit. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation, 16(1), 1-25.
13. Preist, C., & Van Tol, M. (1998). Adaptive agents in a persistent shout double auction. In Proc. of the international conference on information and computation economies (pp. 11-18). Charleston SC.
14. Preist, C. (1999). Commodity trading using an agent-based iterated double auction. In Proc. of the third annual conference on autonomous agents (pp. 131-138). Seattle WA.
15. Rodriguez, V., & Jondral, F. K. (2007). Technical-economic impact of UWB personal area networks on a UMTS cell: Market-driven dynamic spectrum allocation revisitied. In 2nd IEEE international symposium on new frontiers in dynamic spectrum access networks (DySPAN 07) (pp. 585-596), 17-20 April.
16. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.
17. Rindfleisch, A., & Heide, J. B. (1997). Transaction cost analysis: Past, present, and future applications. Journal of Marketing, 61(4), 30-54.
18. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning internal representations by error propagation. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 318-362). Foundations, Cambridge: MIT.
19. Shelanski, H. A., & Klein, P. G. (1995). Empirical research in transaction cost economics: A review and assessment. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 11(2), 335-361.
20. Smith, V. L. (1962). An experimental study of comparative market behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 70(2), 111-137.
21. Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998). Reinforcement learning: An introduction. Cambridge: MIT.
22. Tesfatsion, L. (2006). Agent-based computational economics: A constructive approach to economic theory. In L. Tesfatsion & K. L. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of computational economics (Vol. 2, pp. 831-877). Agent-based Computational Economics, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
23. Tonmukayakul, A., & Weiss, M. B. (2004). Secondary use of radio spectrum: A feasibility analysis. In Presented at the telecommunications policy research conference TPRC'04. Arlington, VA, October.
24. Tonmukayakul, A., & Weiss, M. B. (2005). An agent-based model for secondary use of radio spectrum. In First international symposium on new frontiers in dynamic spectrum access networks (IEEE DySPAN'05) (pp. 467-475), 8-11 November.
25. Tonmukayakul, A., & Weiss, M. B. (2006). A transaction cost analysis of secondary vs. unlicensed spectrum use. In Presented at the telecommunications policy research conference TPRC'06. Arlington, VA, October.
26. Tonmukayakul, A. (2007). An agent-based model for secondary use of radio spectrum. PhD Dissertation, School of Information Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, October.
27. Wang, X., & Schulzrinne, H. (2000). An integrated resource negotiation, pricing, and QoS adaptation framework for multimedia applications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 18(12), 2514-2529.
28. Wilkie, S. (2007). Open acccess for the 700MHz auction. New America Foundation Policy Brief No. 21 July.
29. Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 269-296.