Estimating environmental effects on population dynamics: Consequences of observation error

Oikos

Volumn 118, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 675-680

  Lindén, Andreas ^a   Knape, Jonas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOCORRELATION; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT; ERROR ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; TIME SERIES;

EID: 65449165039     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17250.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Brännström, Å. Sumpter, D. J. T. 2006. Stochastic analogues of deterministic single-species population models Theor. Popul. Biol. 69 : 442 451.
2. Chatfield, C. 2004. The analysis of time series - an introduction, (6th ed). Chapman and Hall.
3. Dennis, B. Otten, M. R. M. 2000. Joint effects of density dependence and rainfall on abundance of San Joaquin kit fox J. Wildlife Manage. 64 : 388 400. (Pubitemid 30221433)
4. Dennis, B. et al. 2006. Estimating density dependence, process noise, and observation error Ecol. Monogr. 76 : 323 341. (Pubitemid 44215703)
5. de Valpine, P. 2003. Better inferences from population-dynamics experiments using Monte Carlo state-space likelihood methods Ecology 84 : 3064 3077. (Pubitemid 38261453)
6. Freckleton, R. P. et al. 2006. Census error and the detection of density dependence J. Anim. Ecol. 75 : 837 851. (Pubitemid 44356614)
7. Gibbs, J. P. 2000. Monitoring populations Boitani, L. Fuller, T. K. Research techniques in animal ecology. Columbia Univ. Press 213 251.
8. Gompertz, B. 1825. On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 115 : 513 585.
9. Hallett, T. B. et al. 2004. Why large-scale climate indices seem to predict ecological processes better than local weather Nature 430 : 71 75. (Pubitemid 38915225)
10. Harvey, A. C. 1990. Forecasting, structural time series models and the Kalman filter. Cambridge Univ. Press.
11. Hilborn, R. Mangel, M. 1997. The ecological detective: confronting models with data. Princeton Univ. Press.
12. IPCC. 2002. Climate change and biodiversity. IPCC Tech. paper V. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.
13. IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis report. Fourth assessment report from Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge Univ. Press.
14. Jonzén, N. et al. 2002. Climate patterns and the stochastic dynamics of migratory birds Oikos 97 : 329 336.
15. Kaitala, V. Ranta, E. 2001. Is the impact of environmental noise visible in the dynamics of age-structured populations? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268 : 1769 1774. (Pubitemid 32844023)
16. Knape, J. 2008. Estimability of density dependence in models of time series data Ecology 89 : 2994 3000.
17. Lundberg, P. et al. 2002. Visibility of demography-modulating noise in population dynamics Oikos 96 : 379 382. (Pubitemid 34543921)
18. Pascual, M. Ellner, S. P. 2000. Linking ecological patterns to environmental forcing via non-linear time series models Ecology 81 : 2767 2780.
19. Piha, M. et al. 2007. Linking weather and habitat to population dynamics of a migratory farmland songbird Ann. Zool. Fenn. 44 : 20 34. (Pubitemid 46587285)
20. Polacheck, T. et al. 1993. Fitting surplus production models: comparing methods and measuring uncertainty Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50 : 2597 2607. (Pubitemid 2072968)
21. Pyper, B. J. Peterman, R. M. 1998. Comparison of methods to account for autocorrelation in correlation analyses of fish data Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55 : 2127 2140. (Pubitemid 28560395)
22. Ranta, E. et al. 2000. Visibility of the environmental noise modulating population dynamics Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267 : 1851 1856.
23. Ricker, W. E. 1954. Stock and recruitment J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 11 : 559 623.
24. Rotella, J. J. et al. 1996. Long-term population analysis of gray partridge in eastern Washington J. Wildlife Manage. 60 : 817 825. (Pubitemid 27013130)
25. Royama, T. 1992. Analytical population dynamics, (1st ed.). Chapman and Hall.
26. Royama, T. 2005. Moran effect on nonlinear population dynamics Ecol. Monogr. 75 : 277 293. (Pubitemid 40640964)
27. Sæther, B.-E. et al. 2000. Population dynamical consequences of climate change for a small temperate songbird Science 287 : 854 856. (Pubitemid 30084328)
28. Sæther, B. E. et al. 2004. Climate influences on avian population dynamics Birds Climate Change 35 : 185 209. (Pubitemid 39752186)
29. Stenseth, N. C. et al. 2002. Ecological effects of climate fluctuations Science 297 : 1292 1296.
30. Stenseth, N. C. et al. 2003. Studying climate effects on ecology through the use of climate indices: the North Atlantic Oscillation, El Niñeo Southern Oscillation and beyond Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270 : 2087 2096. (Pubitemid 37304034)
31. Turchin, P. 1995. Population regulation: old arguments and a new synthesis Cappuccino, N. Price, P.W. Population dynamics: new approaches and synthesis, (1st ed.). Academic Press 19 40.
32. Turchin, P. 1999. Population regulation: a synthetic view Oikos 84 : 153 159. (Pubitemid 29101005)
33. Vasseur, D. A. Yodzis, P. 2004. The color of environmental noise Ecology 85 : 1146 1152. (Pubitemid 39471061)
34. Viljugrein, H. et al. 2005. Density dependence in North American ducks Ecology 86 : 245 254. (Pubitemid 40199608)
35. Walther, G.-R. et al. 2002. Ecological responses to recent climate change Nature 416 : 389 395. (Pubitemid 34272866)