Enabling participatory planning after disasters

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 41-59

  Ganapati, N Emel ^a   Ganapati, Sukumar ^a  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Disaster recovery; Earthquake; Planning; Public participation; Turkey; World Bank

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION; DISASTER MANAGEMENT; HOUSING PROJECT; KOCAELI EARTHQUAKE 1999; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; NEIGHBORHOOD; RECONSTRUCTION; WORLD BANK;

EURASIA; GOLCUK; KOCAELI [TURKEY]; TURKEY;

EID: 65449157263     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360802546254     Document Type: Article

References (123)

1. Afet Fonlariyla Borc Odeniyor! [Debt is being paid with disaster funds!] (1999) Milliyet
2. Alexander, E. R. (2005) Institutional transformation and planning: From institutionalization theory to institutional design. Planning Theory, 4:3, pp. 209-223.
3. Allmendinger, P. and Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2002) The communicative turn in urban planning: Unraveling paradigmatic, imperialistic and moralistic dimensions. Space and Polity, 6:1, pp. 5-24.
4. Anadolu Agency. (2001) Turkish earthquake project wins World Bank president's award.
5. Arnstein, S. R. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of American Institute of Planners, 35:4, pp. 216-224.
6. Association for Protection and Development of Kocaeli-Golcuk and Solidarity with the Disadvantaged (MAǦDER) (2000) Tuzuk, Author. [Bylaws.], Golcuk, Turkey
7. Aysan, Y. and Oliver, P. (1987) Housing and culture after earthquakes; Aguide for future policy making on housing in seismic areas, Oxford Polytechnic., Oxford, UK
8. Ball, M. (1998) Institutions in British property research: A review. Urban Studies, 35:9, pp. 1501-1517.
9. Berke, P. R. and Beatley, T. (1997) After the hurricane: Linking recovery to sustainable development in the Caribbean, Johns Hopkins University Press., Baltimore
10. Berke, P. R. and Campanella, T. J. (2006) Planning for post-disaster resiliency. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604:1, pp. 192-207.
11. Berke, P. R., Kartez, J. and Wenger, D. (1993) Recovery after disaster: Achieving sustainable development, mitigation and equity. Disasters, 17:2, pp. 93-109.
12. Berry, J. M., Portney, K. E. and Thompson, K. (1993) The rebirth of urban democracy, The Brookings Institution., Washington, DC
13. Bolin, R. and Stanford, L. (1991) Shelter, housing and recovery: Acomparison of U.S. disasters. Disasters, 15:1, pp. 24-34.
14. Bozkurt, G. (2001) Deprem sonras1 planlama deneyimi [Post-earthquake planning experiment]. Planlama, 2001:3, pp. 50-53.
15. (1998) New institutionalism in sociology, Russell Sage Foundation., New York
16. Buckley, R. M. and Kalarickal, J. (2006) Thirty years of World Bank shelter lending: What have we learned?, World Bank., Washington, DC
17. Checkoway, B. (1981) The politics of public meetings. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 17:4, pp. 566-582.
18. CHP, Afet Raporu Haz1rlad1 [CHP prepared a disaster report]. (1999) Milliyet
19. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters. (2008) Turkey country profile-Emergency events database (EM-DAT)
20. Cole, R. and Caputo, D. (1984) The public hearing as an effective public participation mechanism: A case study of the general revenue sharing program. American Political Science Review, 78:2, pp. 404-416.
21. Cuny, F. C. (1979) Scenario for a housing improvement program in disaster-prone areas. Disasters, 3:3, pp. 253-257.
22. Davidson, C. H., Johnson, C., Lizarraldea, G., Dikmen, N. and Sliwinski, A. (2007) Truths and myths about community participation in post-disaster housing projects. Habitat International, 31:1, pp. 100-115.
23. Day, D. (1997) Citizen participation in the planning process: An essentially contested concept?. Journal of Planning Literature, 11:3, pp. 421-434.
24. (2002) Depremzedeler Kal1c1 Konutlara Raǧgbet Etmiyor [Earthquake victims do not prefer permanent houses], Hurriyet
25. Ebrahim, A. and Herz, S. (2007) Accountability in complex organizations: World Bank responses to civil society, Faculty Research Working Papers Series). John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University
26. (2007) Global accountabilities: Participation, pluralism and public ethics, Cambridge University Press., Cambridge, UK
27. El-Masri, M. and Kellett, P. (2001) Post-war reconstruction: Participatory approaches to rebuilding the damaged villages of Lebanon, a case study of al-Burjain. Habitat International, 25:4, pp. 535-557.
28. Flint, C. G. and Luloff, A. E. (2005) Natural resource-based communities, risk, and disaster: An intersection of theories. Society & Natural Resources, 18:5, pp. 399-412.
29. Forester, J. (1989) Planning in the face of power, University of California Press., Berkeley
30. Forester, J. (2006) Making participation work when interests conflict: Moving from facilitating dialogue and moderating debate to mediating negotiations. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72:4, pp. 447-456.
31. Fothergill, A., Maestas, E. G. and Darlington, J. D. (1999) Race, ethnicity and disasters in the United States: A review of the literature. Disasters, 23:2, pp. 156-173.
32. Friedmann, J. (1992) Empowerment: The politics of alternative development, Blackwell., Oxford, UK
33. Fung, A. (2002) Recipes for public spheres: Eight institutional design choices and their consequences. Journal of Political Philosophy, 11:3, pp. 338-367.
34. Fung, A. (2004) Empowered participation: Reinventing urban democracy, Princeton University Press., Princeton, NJ
35. Ganapati, N. E. (2005) Rising from the rubble: Disaster victims, social capital, and public policy-Case of Golcuk, Turkey. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
36. Ganapati, N. E. (2008) Disaster management structure in Turkey: Away from a reactive and paternalistic approach?. Disaster management handbook, pp. 281-320. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
37. Giddens, A. (1984) The constitution of society, Polity Press., Cambridge, UK
38. Golcuk 17 August Association (GADER). (2000) Tuzuk, Author. [Bylaws], Golcuk, Turkey
39. Golcuk Municipality. (1995) Kocaeli Ili, Golcuk Ilce Belediyesi Ilave Revizyon Imar Plan1 On Cal1smalar1 ve 1/5000 Olcekli Ilave Revizyon Naz1m Imar Plan1, 1/1000 Olcekli Ilave Revizyon Uygulama Imar Plan1 Teknik Izah Raporu [Urb, Gunturkun Bukulmez Planlama Burosu, Istanbul, Turkey
40. Gonzalez, S. and Healey, P. (2005) A sociological institutionalist approach to the study of innovation in governance capacity. Urban Studies, 42:11, pp. 2055-2069.
41. Gurenko, E., Lester, R., Mahul, O. and Gonulal, S. O. (2006) Earthquake insurance in Turkey: History of the Turkish catastrophe insurance pool, World Bank., Washington, DC
42. (1977) Reconstruction following disaster, MIT Press., Cambridge, MA
43. Hall, P. and Taylor, R. (1996) Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44:5, pp. 936-957.
44. Hanna, K. S. (2000) The paradox of participation and the hidden role of information: A case study. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66:4, pp. 398-410.
45. Healey, P. (1992) Planning through debate. Town Planning Review, 63:2, pp. 143-162.
46. Healey, P. (2006) Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies, Palgrave MacMillan., New York
47. Healey, P. (2007) The new institutionalism and the transformative goals of planning. Institutions and planning, pp. 61-87. Elsevier, Amsterdam
48. Huxley, M. (2000) The limits to communicative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19:4, pp. 369-377.
49. Huxley, M. and Yiftachel, O. (2000) New paradigm or old myopia? Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19:4, pp. 333-342.
50. Inam, A. (1999) Institutions, routines, and crises: Post-earthquake housing recovery in Mexico City and Los Angeles. Cities, 16:6, pp. 391-407.
51. Inam, A. (2005) Planning for the unplanned: Recovering from crises in megacities, Routledge., New York
52. Innes, J. and Booher, D. E. (1999) Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65:4, pp. 412-423.
53. Innes, J. and Booher, D. E. (2004) Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5:4, pp. 419-436.
54. Izmit City Assembly (2008) Kocaeli Afet Sonras1 Coǧrafi Bilgi Paylas1m Sistemi-Golcuk [Kocaeli postdisaster geographic information sharing system-Golcuk]
55. Jalali, R. (2002) Civil society and the state: Turkey after the earthquake. Disasters, 26:2, pp. 120-139.
56. Johnson, C. (2007) Impacts of prefabricated temporary housing after disasters: 1999 earthquakes in Turkey. Habitat International, 31:1, pp. 36-52.
57. Johnson, L. (1999) Empowering local governments in disaster recovery management: Lessons from Watsonville and Oakland in recovering from the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake and other recent disasters, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute., Oakland, CA
58. Kemp, R. (1985) Planning, public meetings, and the politics of discourse. Critical theory and public life, pp. 177-201. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
59. King, C. S., Feltey, K. M. and Susel, B. O. (1998) The question of participation: Towards authentic public participation in public administration. Public Administration Review, 58:4, pp. 317-326.
60. Kreimer, A. (1980) Low-income housing under "normal" and post-disaster situations: Some basic continuities. Habitat International, 4:3, pp. 273-283.
61. Kubicek, P. (2001) The earthquake, Europe, and prospects for political change in Turkey. Middle East Review of International Affairs, 5:2, pp. 34-47.
62. Kubicek, P. (2002) The earthquake, civil society, and political change in Turkey: Assessment and comparison with Eastern Europe. Political Studies, 50:4, pp. 761-778.
63. Kweit, M. G. and Kweit, R. W. (2004) Citizen participation and citizenevaluation in disaster recovery. The American Review of Public Administration, 34:4, pp. 354-373.
64. Laurian, L. (2004) Public participation in environmental decision making: Findings from communities facing toxic waste cleanup. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70:1, pp. 53-65.
65. Leighninger, M. (2002) Shared governance in communities: Using study circles to put citizens at the center of the system. Public Organization Review: A Global Journal, 2:3, pp. 267-283.
66. Leighninger, M. (2006) The next form of democracy: How expert rule is giving way to shared governance and why politics will never be the same., Vanderbilt University Press., Nashville, TN
67. Lessons from Turkey. (1999) The Economist, 352:8134, p. 16.
68. Lukensmeyer, C. J. and Torres, L. H. (2006) Public deliberation: A manager's guide to citizen engagement, IBM Center for the Business of Government., Washington, DC
69. Lyons, W. E. and Lowery, D. (1986) The organization of political space and citizen responses to dissatisfaction in urban communities: An integrative model. Journal of Politics, 48:2, pp. 321-346.
70. Maskrey, A. (1989) Disaster mitigation: Community based approach, Oxfam Press., Oxford, UK
71. Maskrey, A. (1994) Disaster mitigation as a crisis of paradigms: Reconstructing after the Alto Mayo Earthquake, Peru. Disasters, development and environment, pp. 109-123. John Wiley & Sons, New York
72. McGuirk, P. M. (2001) Situating communicative planning theory: Context, power, and knowledge. Environment and Planning A, 33:2, pp. 195-217.
73. Neuman, M. (2000) Communicate this! Does consensus lead to advocacy and pluralism?. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19:4, pp. 343-350.
74. North, D. (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
75. Oliver-Smith, A. (1991) Successes and failures in post-disaster resettlement. Disasters, 15:1, pp. 12-23.
76. Oliver-Smith, A. (1996) Anthropological research on hazards and disasters. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, pp. 303-328.
77. Olshansky, R. B. (2006) Planning after Hurricane Katrina. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72:2, pp. 147-153.
78. Passerini, E. (2000) Disasters as agents of social change in recovery and reconstruction. Natural Hazards Review, 1:2, pp. 67-72.
79. Philips, B. (1997) Qualitative methods and disaster research. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 15:1, pp. 179-195.
80. Pløger, J. (2001) Public participation and the art of governance. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28:2, pp. 219-241.
81. Possekel, A. K. (1999) Living with the unexpected: Linking disaster recovery to sustainable development in Montserrat, Springer., Berlin, Germany
82. Prime Minister's Office-Crisis Management Center (PMO-CMC). (2000) Depremler 1999 [Earthquakes 1999], Author, Ankara, Turkey
83. Prime Minister's Office-Project Implementation Unit (PMO-PIU). (2000) MEER Kapsam1nda Yap1lacak Kal1c1 Konut Alanlar1 Planlamas1 Golcuk Kal1c1 Konut Alan1 Planlama Raporu [Golcuk MEER permanent housing areas planning report], Author., Ankara, Turkey
84. Prime Minister's Office-Project Implementation Unit (PMO-PIU). (2001) Kal1c1 Konut Insaatlar1 Insaat Kontrolluǧu [Inspection of permanent housing construction]. PMO-PIU May Newsletter, 1:3, pp. 3-4.
85. Prime Minister's Office-Project Implementation Unit (PMO-PIU). (2001) 2001bPUB-MEER Kal1c1 Konutlar1 [PUB-MEER permanent houses]. PMO-PIU March Newsletter, 1:1, pp. 3-5.
86. Pugh, C. (1994) Housing policy development in developing countries: The World Bank and internationalization, 1972-93. Cities, 11:3, pp. 159-180.
87. Quarantelli, E. (1982) Sheltering and housing after major community disasters: Case studies and general observations, Ohio State University., Columbus
88. Rowe, G. and Frewer, L. J. (2000) Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology and Human Values, 25:1, pp. 3-29.
89. Rubin, C. B., Saperstein, M. D. and Barbee, D. G. (1985) Community recovery from a major natural disaster (Monograph No. 41). Boulder: University of Colorado, Program on Environment and Behavior, Institute of Behavioral Science
90. Sager, T. (2006) The logic of critical communicative planning: Transaction cost alteration. Planning Theory, 5:3, pp. 223-254.
91. (1998) Planning for post-disaster recovery and reconstruction (Planning advisory service report 483/484), American Planning Association, Chicago
92. Schwab, J. (1998) Post-disaster zoning opportunities. Zoning News, pp. 1-4.
93. Scott, J. C. (1998) Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed, Yale University Press., New Haven, CT
94. Sirianni, C. (2007) Neighborhood planning as collaborative democratic design. Journal of the American Planning Association, 73:4, pp. 373-387.
95. Sirianni, C. and Friedland, L. (2001) Civic innovation in America: Community empowerment, public policy, and the movement for civic renewal, University of California Press., Berkeley
96. Skogan, W. G. (2006) Police and community in Chicago: A tale of three cities, Oxford University Press., Oxford, UK
97. Snarr, D. N. and Brown, L. (1982) Attrition and housing improvements: A study of post-disaster housing after three years. Disasters, 6:2, pp. 125-131.
98. State Institute of Statistics. (2002) 2000 census of population: Social and economic characteristics of population-Kocaeli, Author., Ankara, Turkey
99. Steinberg, F. (2007) Housing reconstruction and rehabilitation in Aceh and Nias, Indonesia-Rebuilding lives. Habitat International, 31:1, pp. 150-166.
100. Strateji Mori. (2000) Evaluation of TEFER housing project in Adana Ceyhan and public participation for reconstruction of housing under MEER, Author., Istanbul
101. Strateji Mori. (2000) Evaluation of TEFER housing project in Adana Ceyhan and public participation for reconstruction of housing under MEER-Final report, Author., Istanbul
102. Susskind, L. and Cruikshank, J. (1987) Breaking the impasse: Consensual approaches to resolving public disputes, Basic Books., New York
103. Tas, N., Cosgun, N. and Tas, M. (2007) A qualitative evaluation of the after earthquake permanent housings in Turkey in terms of user satisfaction-Kocaeli, Gundoǧdu permanent housing model. Building and Environment, 42:9, pp. 3418-3431.
104. Tauxe, C. S. (1995) Marginalizing public participation in local planning: An ethnographic account. Journal of the American Planning Association, 61:4, pp. 471-481.
105. Thomas, J. C. (1995) Public participation in public decisions: New skills and strategies for public managers, Jossey Bass., San Francisco
106. Tootle, D. M. (2007) Disaster recovery in rural communities: A case study of southwest Louisiana. Southern Rural Sociology, 22:2, pp. 6-27.
107. Turner, J. F. (1977) Housing by people: Towards autonomy in building environments, Pantheon Books., New York
108. (1972) Freedom to build: Dweller control of the housing process, Macmillan., New York
109. Union Chambers of Turkish Engineers and Architects. (2000) Doǧu Marmara Depremleri ve Turkiye Gercekleri [East Marmara earthquakes and the realities of Turkey], Author., Ankara, Turkey
110. United Nations-Disaster Relief Organization. (1982) Shelter after disaster: Guidelines for assistance, Author., New York
111. United Nations-Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. (2006) Exploring key changes and developments in post-disaster settlement, shelter and housing, 1982-2006, Author., Geneva, Switzerland
112. U. S. Central Intelligence Agency. (2008) The World Factbook: Turkey
113. (2005) The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster, Oxford University Press., New York
114. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L. and Brady, H. E. (1995) Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics, Harvard University Press., Cambridge, MA
115. (2007) Institutions and planning, Elsevier., Amsterdam
116. World Bank. (1995) Emergency recovery assistance, operational policy 8.50
117. World Bank. (1999) Turkey: Marmara Earthquake assessment, Author., Washington, DC
118. World Bank. (1999) Project appraisal document on a proposed loan in the amount of US$505 million to the Republic of Turkey for Marmara Earthquake Emergency Reconstruction Project, Author., Washington, DC
119. World Bank. (2005) Project performance assessment report-Turkey (Erzincan Earthquake Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Project, Turkey Emergency Flood and Earthquake Recovery Project, Emergency Earthquake Recovery Project)
120. World Bank. (2007) Implementation completion and results report (IBRD-45170) on a loan in the amount of US$ 294.4 million to the Republic of Turkey for Marmara Earthquake Emergency Reconstruction Project (Report No: ICR0000131), Author, Ankara, Turkey
121. World Bank. (2007) Operational policies 8.00-Rapid response to crises and emergencies
122. World Bank Independent Evaluation Group (WB-IEG). (2006) Hazards of nature, risks to development: An IEG evaluation of the World Bank assistance for natural disasters, Author., Washington, DC
123. Yerelnet. (2007) Imar Kanunu No. 3194 [Urban development law No. 3194]