Evaluation of 2 different reference planes used for the study of asymmetric facial malformations

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 41-45

  Pelo, Sandro ^a   Deli, Roberto ^b   Correra, Pasquale ^a,b   Boniello, Roberto ^a   Gasparini, Giulio ^a   Moro, Alessandro ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Craniofacial malformation; Facial asymmetry; Surgical planning; Three dimensional CT

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CANINE TOOTH; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FACE ASYMMETRY; FACE MALFORMATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MICROCOMPUTER; MOLAR TOOTH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMICIRCULAR CANAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ADOLESCENT; AUDITORY CANAL; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CRANIOFACIAL MALFORMATION; EVALUATION; METHODOLOGY; ORBIT; RADIOGRAPHY; REFERENCE VALUE; STATISTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CEPHALOMETRY; CRANIOFACIAL ABNORMALITIES; CUSPID; EAR CANAL; FACIAL ASYMMETRY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MOLAR; ORBIT; REFERENCE VALUES; SEMICIRCULAR CANALS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 65449131722     PISSN: 10492275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318190ddd3     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Vannier MW, Marsh JL, Warren JO. Three dimensional CT reconstruction images for craniofacial surgical planning and evaluation. Radiology 1984;150:179-184
2. Adams GL, Gansky SA, Miller AJ, et al. Comparison between traditional 2-dimensional cephalometry and a 3-dimensional approach on human dry skulls. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:397-409
3. Lou L, Lagravere MO, Compton S, et al. Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:402-411
4. Kwon TG, Park HS, Ryoo HM, et al. A comparison of craniofacial morphology in patients with and without facial asymmetryVa three-dimensional analysis with computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;35:43-48
5. Athanasiou AE. Orthodontic Cephalometry. London: Mosby-Wolfe, 1995.
6. Chen YJ, Chen SK, Yao JC, et al. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry. Angle Orthod 2004;74:155-161
7. Kamiishi H, Miyasato Y, Kosaka M. Development of the 3D-cephalogram: a technical note. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2007;35:258-260
8. Park SH, Yu HS, Kim KD, et al. A proposal for a new analysis of craniofacial morphology by 3-dimensional computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:600.e23Ye34
9. Katusumata A, Fujishita M, Maeda M, et al. 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;99:212-220
10. Kawamata A, Ariji Y, Langlais RP. Three-dimensional computed tomography imaging in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2000;44:395-410
11. Kawamata A, Ariji Y, Langlais RP. Three-dimensional imaging for orthognathic surgery and orthodontic treatment. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2001;13:713-725
12. Hwang HS, Hwang CH, Lee KH, et al. Maxillofacial 3-dimensional image analysis for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:779-785
13. Troulis MJ, Everett P, Seldin EB, et al. Development of a three-dimensional treatment planning system based on computed tomographic data. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;31:349-357
14. Broadbent BH. A new x-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1931;1:45-66
15. Eisenfeld J, Mishelevich DJ. Computer-based research studies on the correction of dentofacial deformities. In: Bell WH, Profitt WR, White RP, eds. Surgical Correction of Dentofacial Deformities. Vol. 2. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1980:1731-1741
16. Kamoen A, Dermaut L, Verbeeck R. The clinical significance of error measurement in the interpretation of treatment results. Eur J Orthod 2001;23:569-578
17. Connor SE, Arscott T, Berry J, et al. Precision and accuracy of low-dose CT protocols in the evaluation of skull landmarks. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36:270-276
18. Klein HM, Schneider W, Nawrath J, et al. Stereolithographic model construction based on 3-dimensional reconstructed CT sectional image sequences. Rofo 1992;156:429-432
19. Klein HM, Schneider W, Alzen G, et al. Pediatric craniofacial surgery: comparison of milling and stereolithography for 3D model manufacturing. Pediatr Radiol 1992;22:458-460
20. Mavili ME, Canter HI, Saglam-Aydinatay B, et al. Use of three-dimensional medical modeling methods for precise planning of orthognathic surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2007;18:740-747
21. Matteson SR, Bechtold W, Phillips C, et al. A method for three-dimensional image reformation for quantitative cephalometric analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;47:1053-1061
22. Ono I, Ohura T, Narumi E, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of craniofacial bones using three-dimensional computer tomography. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1992;20:49-60
23. Cavalcanti MG, Rocha SS, Vannier MW. Craniofacial measurements based on 3D-CT volume rendering: implications for clinical applications. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:170-176
24. Kim YH, Sato K, Mitani H, et al. Asymmetry of the sphenoid bone and its suitability as a reference for analyzing craniofacial asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:656-662
25. Vinchon M, Pellerin P, Pertuzon B, et al. Vestibular orientation for craniofacial surgery: application to the management of unicoronal synostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 2007;23:1403-1409