In vitro influence of stem surface finish and mantle conformity on pressure generation in cemented hip arthroplasty

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 144-149

  Bartlett, Gavin E ^a   Gill, Harinderjit S ^a   Murray, David W ^a,b   Beard, David J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b NUFFIELD ORTHOPAEDIC CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERFACE PRESSURE; MATERIALS HANDLING; POLISHED STEM SURFACE; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; ROUGH STEM SURFACE; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURFACE STRESS;

EID: 65449123531     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453670902876755     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Alfaro-Adrian J, Gill H S, Murray D W. Cement migration after THR. A comparison of Charnley Elite and Exeter femoral stems using RSA. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1999; 81 (1): 130-134
2. Anthony P P, Gie G A, Howie C R, Ling R S. Localised endosteal bone lysis in relation to the femoral components of cemented total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1990; 72 (6): 971-979
3. Aspenberg P, van der Vis H. Fluid pressure may cause periprosthetic osteolysis. Particles are not the only thing. Acta Orthop Scand 1998; 69 (1): 1-4.
4. Bartlett G E, Beard D J, Murray D W, Gill H S. The femoral stem pump in cemented hip arthroplasty: An in vitro model. Med Eng Phys 2008; 30: 1042-1048
5. Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A. Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. J Biomech 1993; 26 (8): 969-990
6. Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Strauss J, Duda GN. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 2001; 34 (7): 859-871
7. Collis D K, Mohler C G. Comparison of clinical outcomes in total hip arthroplasty using rough and polished cemented stems with essentially the same geometry. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2002; 84 (4): 586-592
8. Crawford R W, Evans M, Ling R S, Murray D W. Fluid flow around model femoral components of differing surface finishes: In vitro investigations. Acta Orthop Scand 1999; 70 (6): 589-595
9. Glyn-Jones S, Gill H S, McLardy-Smith P, Murray D W. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A two-year study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2004; 86 (2): 172-176
10. Harris W H. Osteolysis and particle disease in hip replacement. A review. Acta Orthop Scand 1994; 65 (1): 113-123
11. Howell J R, Jr., Blunt L A, Doyle C, Hooper R M, Lee A J, Ling R S. In vivo surface wear mechanisms of femoral components of cemented total hip arthroplasties: The influence of wear mechanism on clinical outcome. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19 (1): 88-101.
12. Malchau H, Herberts P, Ahnfelt L. Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden. Follow-up of 92,675 operations performed 1978-1990. Acta Orthop Scand 1993; 64 (5): 497-506.
13. Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T, Garellick G, Soderman P. The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) (Suppl 2) 2002; 84: 2-20.
14. Manley M T, D'Antonio J A, Capello W N, Edidin A A. Osteolysis: A disease of access to fixation interfaces. Clin Orthop 2002; (405): 129-137
15. McEvoy A, Jeyam M, Ferrier G, Evans C E, Andrew J G. Synergistic effect of particles and cyclic pressure on cytokine production in human monocyte/ macrophages: Proposed role in periprosthetic osteolysis. Bone 2002; 30 (1): 171-177
16. Williams H D, Browne G, Gie G A, Ling R S, Timperley A J, Wendover N A. The Exeter universal cemented femoral component at 8 to 12 years. A study of the first 325 hips. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2002; 84 (3): 324-334