Coupling the Xinanjiang model to a kinematic flow model based on digital drainage networks for flood forecasting

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 23, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1337-1348

  Liu, Jintao ^a,b   Chen, Xi ^a   Zhang, Jiabao ^b   Flury, Markus ^c  

^a HOHAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Institute of Soil Science   (China)

^c WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital elevation model; Drainage network; Kinematic wave method; Land use; Runoff infiltration; Xinanjiang model

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; DRAINAGE NETWORK; FLOOD EVENTS; FLOOD FORECASTING; FLOW VECTORS; GRID CELLS; GRID-BASED; HILLSLOPES; HUAIHE RIVERS; HUMID REGIONS; KINEMATIC FLOWS; KINEMATIC WAVE METHOD; KINEMATIC WAVES; OVERLAND FLOWS; PHYSICALLY BASED; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS; RUNOFF YIELDS; VALIDATION RESULTS; WATER DISCHARGES; WATER FLOW DIRECTIONS; XINANJIANG MODEL;

CATCHMENTS; DIGITAL INSTRUMENTS; DISCHARGE (FLUID MECHANICS); DRAINAGE; ENGINEERING GEOLOGY; GEOMORPHOLOGY; KINEMATICS; LAND USE; RAIN; RUNOFF; SEEPAGE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOIL MECHANICS; SURVEYING;

HYDRAULIC MODELS;

CATCHMENT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; DRAINAGE NETWORK; FLOOD FORECASTING; FLOW MODELING; HILLSLOPE; INFILTRATION; KINEMATICS; LAND USE; OVERLAND FLOW; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; RUNOFF; TOPOGRAPHIC EFFECT;

ASIA; CHINA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; HUAI RIVER;

EID: 65449122315     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7255     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Abbott MB, Bathurst JC, Cunge JA, O'Connell PE. 1986. An introduction to the European Hydrological System-Système Hydrologique Européen, "SHE", 2, Structure of a physically-based, distributed modeling system. Journal of Hydrology 87: 61-77.
2. Ajward MH, Muzik I. 2000. A Spatially Varied Unit Hydrograph Model. Journal of Environmental Hydrology 8: 1-8.
3. Barling RD, Moore ID. 1994. Role of buffer strips in management of waterway pollution: a review. Environmental Management 18: 543-558.
4. Calver A, Wood WL. 1995. The institute of hydrology distributed model. In Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, Singh VP (ed.). Water Resource publications: Colorado; 595-626, Chapter 17.
5. Chen X, Chen YD, Xu CY. 2007. A distributed monthly hydrological model for integrating spatial variations of basin topography and rainfall. Hydrological Processes 21: 242-252.
6. Christensen N, Lettenmaier DP. 2007. A multimodel ensemble approach to assessment of climate change impacts on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River basin. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 11: 1417-1434.
7. Das T, Bárdossy A, Zehe E, He E. 2008. Comparison of conceptual model performance using different representations of spatial variability. Journal of Hydrology 356: 106-118.
8. De Roo APJ, Wesseling CG, Van Deursen WPA. 2000. Physically-based river basin modelling within a GIS: The LISFLOOD model. Hydrological Processes 14: 1981-1992.
9. Du JK, Xie SP, Xu YP, Xu CY, Singh VP. 2007. Development and testing of a simple physically-based distributed rainfall-runoff model for storm runoff simulation in humid forested basins. Journal of Hydrology 336: 334-346.
10. Engman ET. 1986. Roughness coefficients for routing surface runoff. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering-ASCE 112(1): 39-53.
11. Fairfield J, Leymarie P. 1991. Drainage networks from grid digital elevation models. Water Resources Research 27: 709-717.
12. FAO. 1998. Land and water digital media series N-1, December, ISBN 92-5-104050-8.
13. Gan TF, Dlamini EM, Biftu GF. 1997. Effects of model complexity and structure, data quality, and objective functions on hydrologic modeling. Journal of Hydrology 192: 81-103.
14. Jia YW, Ni GS, Kawahara Y, Suetsugi T. 2001. Development of WEP model and its application to an urban watershed. Hydrological Processes 15: 2175-2194.
15. Kavvas ML, Chen ZQ, Dogrul C, Yoon JY, Ohara N, Liang L, Aksoy H, Anderson ML, Yoshitani J, Fukami K, Matsuura T. 2004. Watershed environmental hydrology (WEHY) model based on upscaled conservation equations: hydrologic module. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering-ASCE 9: 450-464.
16. Kibler DF, Woolhiser DA. 1970. Mathematical properties of the kinematic cascade. Journal of Hydrology 15: 131-147.
17. Li ZJ, Ge WZ, Liu JT, Zhao K. 2004a. Coupling between weather radar rainfall data and a distributed hydrological model for real-time flood forecasting. Hydrological Sciences Journal-Journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques 49: 945-958.
18. Li L, Zhu RR, Zhong MJ. 2004b. Application of LL-II distributed rainfall-runoff model based on GIS. Water Resources Power 22(1): 8-11, (in Chinese).
19. Liang X, Lettenmaier DP, Wood EF. 1996. One-dimensional statistical dynamic representation of subgrid spatial variability of precipitation in the two-layer variable infiltration capacity model. Journal of Geophysical Research 101(D16): 21: 403-21, 422.
20. Liu Z, Martina MVL, Todini E. 2005. Flood forecasting using a fully distributed model: application of the TOPKAPI model to the Upper Xixian Catchment. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 9: 347-364.
21. Lohmann D, Raschke E, Nijssen B, Lettenmaier DP. 1998. Regional scale hydrology: I. Formulation of the VIC-2L model coupled to a routing model. Hydrological Sciences Journal-Journal des Sciences Hydrologiques 43: 131-141.
22. Lu GH, Wu ZY, Wen L, Lin CA, Zhang JY, Yang Y. 2008. Real-time flood forecast and flood alert map over the Huaihe River Basin in China using a coupled hydro-meteorological modeling system. Science in China Series E-Technological Sciences 51: 1049-1063.
23. MacCormack RW. 1971. Numerical solution of the interaction of a shock wave with a laminar boundary layer. Lecture Notes in Physics 8: 151-163, Springer-Verlag.
24. Maidment DR, Olivera F. 1996. Unit Hydrograph Derived From A Spatially Distributed Velocity Field. Hydrological Processes 10: 831-844.
25. Martz LW, Garbrecht J. 1992. Numerical definition of drainage network and subcatchment areas from digital elevation models. Computers & Geosciences 18: 747-761.
26. Michaud JD, Sorooshian S. 1994. Comparison of simple versus complex distributed runoff models on a midsized, semiarid watershed. Water Resources Research 30: 596-605.
27. Reed S, Koren V, Smith M, Zhang Z, Moreda F, Seo DJ, DMIP Participants. 2004. Overall distributed model intercomparison project results. Journal of Hydrology 298: 27-60.
28. Rodriguez-Iturbe I, Valdes JB. 1979. The geomorphologic structure of hydrologic response. Water Resources Research 15: 1409-1420.
29. Singh VP. 1996. Kinematic Wave Modeling in Water Resources: Surface Water Hydrology. John Wiley and Sons: New York.
30. Singh VP, Woolhiser DA. 1976. A nonlinear kinematic wave model for watershed surface runoff. Journal of Hydrology 31: 221-243.
31. Smith ER, Goodrich DC, Woolhiser DA, Unkrich CL. 1995. KINEROSA kinematic runoff and erosion model. In Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, Chapter 7, Singh VP (Ed.). Water Resources Publication: Colorado; 697-732.
32. Todini E. 1996. The ARNO rainfall-runoff model. Journal of Hydrology 175: 339-382.
33. Todini E, Ciarapica L. 2001. The TOPKAPI model. In Mathematical models of large watershed hydrology, Chapter 12, Singh VP (Ed.). Water Resources Publications: Colorado, USA.
34. Wang MH, Hjelmfelt AT. 1998. DEM based overland flow routing model. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering-ASCE 3: 1-8.
35. Woolhiser DA. 1975. Simulation of unsteady overland flow. In Unsteady Flow in Open Channels, Vol. II Mahmood K, Yevjevich V (eds). Water Resources Publications: Fort Collins, Co; 502.
36. Zhang Q, Tan LY, Xu YP, Ge XP. 2003. Exploration of distributed unit hydrograph mode to rainfall-runoff. Journal of Nanjing University 39: 139-143, (in Chinese).
37. Zhao RJ. 1983. Watershed Hydrological Model - Xinanjiang Model and Shanbei Model. Water & Power Press: Beijing, (in Chinese).
38. Zhao RJ. 1992. The Xinanjiang model applied in China. Journal of Hydrology 135: 371-381.
39. Zhao RJ, Liu XR. 1995. The Xinanjiang model. In Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, Singh VP (ed.). Water Resources Publication: Colorado; 215-232, Chapter 7.