Messina: A novel analysis tool to identify biologically relevant molecules in disease

PLoS ONE

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2009, Pages

  Pinese, Mark ^a   Scarlett, Christopher J ^a   Kench, James G ^a,b,c   Colvin, Emily K ^a   Segara, Davendra ^a,d   Henshall, Susan M ^a   Sutherland, Robert L ^a   Biankin, Andrew V ^a,d  

^a GARVAN INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c ROYAL PRINCE ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^d BANKSTOWN LIDCOMBE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM BINDING PROTEIN; MESSENGER RNA; PROTEIN S 100; CHEMOTACTIC FACTOR; S100A2 PROTEIN, HUMAN;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CARCINOGENESIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNET; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; PANCREAS CANCER; PHENOTYPE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ALGORITHM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA MICROARRAY; EVALUATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC PROCEDURES; GENETICS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; NEOPLASM; PANCREAS TUMOR; PROTEIN MICROARRAY; STATISTICS;

ALGORITHMS; CHEMOTACTIC FACTORS; DATABASES, GENETIC; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETIC TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; NEOPLASMS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PROTEIN ARRAY ANALYSIS; S100 PROTEINS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE;

EID: 65449116034     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005337     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Harvey JM, Clark GM, Osborne CK, Allred DC (1999) Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 17: 1474-1481.
2. Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, et al. (1987) Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science 235: 177-182.
3. Widakowich C, de Azambuja E, Gil T, Cardoso F, Dinh P, et al. (2007) Molecular targeted therapies in breast cancer: where are we now? Int J Biochem Cell Biol 39: 1375-1387.
4. Tomlins SA, Rhodes DR, Perner S, Dhanasekaran SM, Mehra R, et al. (2005) Recurrent fusion of TMPRSS2 and ETS transcription factor genes in prostate cancer. Science 310: 644-648.
5. Tomlins SA, Rhodes DR, Yu J, Varambally S, Mehra R, et al. (2008) The role of SPINK1 in ETS rearrangement-negative prostate cancers. Cancer Cell 13: 519-528.
6. Tibshirani R, Hastie T (2007) Outlier sums for differential gene expression analysis. Biostatistics 8: 2-8.
7. Li L, Chaudhuri A, Chant J, Tang Z (2007) PADGE: analysis of heterogeneous patterns of differential gene expression. Physiol Genomics 32: 154-159.
8. Segara D, Biankin AV, Kench JG, Langusch CC, Dawson AC, et al. (2005) Expression of HOXB2, a retinoic acid signaling target in pancreatic cancer and pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Clin Cancer Res 11: 3587-3596.
9. Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-Vector Networks. Machine Learning 20: 273-297.
10. Nadeau C, Bengio Y (2003) Inference for the generalization error. Machine Learning 52: 239-281.
11. Irizarry RA, Bolstad BM, Collin F, Cope LM, Hobbs B, et al. (2003) Summaries of Affymetrix GeneChip probe level data. Nucleic Acids Research 31:
12. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Statist 57: 289-300.
13. Smyth GK (2004) Linear models and empirical Bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 3: Article 3.
14. Smyth GK (2005) Limma: linear models for microarray data. In: Gentleman R, Carey V, Dudoit S, Irizarry R, Huber W, eds. Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions using R and Bioconductor. New York: Springer. pp. 397-420.
15. Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D (2001) The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Annals of Statistics 29: 1165-1188.