Invasive cervical cancer audit: A relative increase in interval cancers while coverage increased and incidence declined

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 116, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 845-853

  Herbert, A ^a,c   Gregory, M ^a   Gupta, S S ^b   Singh, N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SOUTHAMPTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b MAHATMA GANDHI INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

^c ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cancer incidence; Cervical cancer audit; Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Cervical screening; CIN treatment; Invasive cervical cancer; Screen detected cancers

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER INVASION; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER SCREENING; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL AUDIT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY;

ADULT; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MASS SCREENING; MEDICAL AUDIT; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 65349186440     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01990.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Herbert A, Anshu, Gregory M, Gupta SS, Singh N. Screen-detected invasive cervical cancer and its clinical significance during the introduction of organized screening. BJOG 2009 116 : 854 859.
2. Herbert A, Singh N, Smith JAE. Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix compared with squamous cell carcinoma: a 12-year study in Southampton and South-West Hampshire. Cytopathology 2001 12 : 26 36.
3. Audit of Invasive Cervical Cancers. NHSCSP Publication no. 28, 2006.
4. Mitchell H, Medley G, Giles G. Cervical cancers diagnosed after negative results on cervical cytology: perspective in the 1980s. BMJ 1990 300 : 1622 6.
5. Ferriman A. Audit shows weaknesses in cervical cancer screening. BMJ 2001 322 : 1141.
6. Herbert A, Stein K, Bryant TN, Breen C, Old P. Relation between the incidence of invasive cervical cancer and the screening interval: is a five year interval too long? J Med Screen 1996 3 : 140 5.
7. Wessex Regional Health Authority. OPCS Mid-Year Population Estimates. 1985-1996.
8. Department of Health. Statistical Bulletin: Cervical Screening Programme, England : 1994-95; 1995-96.
9. Department of Health. Cervical Cytology 1991-92; 1992-3. Summary Information from Forms KC53 and KC61: England.
10. Wessex Regional Health Authority. Form KC53 for Southampton and south west Hampshire 1991-92 and 1992-93.
11. Gornall RJ, Boyd IE, Manolitsas T, Herbert A. Interval cervical cancer following treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2000 10 : 198 202.
12. Sasieni P, Adams J, Cuzick J. Benefit of cervical screening at different ages: evidence from the UK audit of screening histories. Br J Cancer 2003 89 : 88 93.
13. Herbert A, Smith JAE. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III (CIN III) and invasive cervical carcinoma: the yawning gap revisited and the treatment of risk. Cytopathology 1999 10 : 161 70.
14. Murdoch JB, Grimshaw RN, Morgan PR, Monaghan JM. The impact of loop diathermy on management of early invasive cervical cancer. Int J Gynecolo Cancer 1992 2 : 129 33.
15. Bray F, Loos AH, McCarron P, Weiderpass E, Arbyn M, Moller H, et al. Trends in cervical squamous cell carcinoma incidence in 13 European countries: changing risk and the effects of screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005 14 : 677 86.
16. Peto J, Gilham C, Fletcher O, Matthews FE. The cervical cancer epidemic that screening has prevented in the UK. Lancet 2004 364 : 249 56.
17. Chamberlain J. Reasons that some screening programmes fail to control cervical cancer. IARC Sci Publ 1986 76 : 161 8.
18. Janerich DT, Hadjimichael O, Schwartz PE, Lowell DM, Meigs JW, Merino MJ, et al. The screening histories of women with invasive cervical cancer, Connecticut. Am J Public Health 1995 85 : 791 4.
19. Herbert A, Johnson J, Patnick J. Achievable standards, benchmarks for reporting and criteria for evaluating cervical cytopathology. Cytopathology 1995 6 : 301 3.
20. Robertson JH, Woodend B. Negative cytology preceding cervical cancer: causes and prevention. J Clin Pathol 1993 46 : 700 2.
21. DeMay RM. Cytopathology of false negatives preceding cervical carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996 175 : 1110 3.
22. Womack C, Warren AY. Problems with audit in cervical cytology. Cytopathology 2000 11 : 200 1.