|
Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 200-201
|
Problem with audit in cervical cytology [5]
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
HUMAN;
INCIDENCE;
LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS;
LETTER;
MORTALITY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SCREENING TEST;
UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY;
FEMALE;
HEALTH CARE QUALITY;
MASS SCREENING;
NOTE;
PATHOLOGY;
STANDARD;
UTERINE CERVIX;
UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR;
VAGINA SMEAR;
CERVIX UTERI;
FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MASS SCREENING;
PATHOLOGY;
QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE;
UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;
VAGINAL SMEARS;
|
EID: 0033624106
PISSN: 09565507
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.2000.00254.x Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (3)
|
References (5)
|