메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 131-136

Perils and posibilities: Achieving best evidence from focus groups in public health research

Author keywords

Evidence; Focus groups; Qualitative

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FOCUS GROUP; GROUP DYNAMICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PUBLIC HEALTH; RESEARCH SUBJECT; CONSUMER; COOPERATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH;

EID: 65349173982     PISSN: 13260200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00358.x     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (79)

References (36)
  • 1
    • 84947648720 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research
    • Daly J, Willis Y, Small R, Green J, et al. A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):43-9.
    • (2007) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.60 , Issue.1 , pp. 43-49
    • Daly, J.1    Willis, Y.2    Small, R.3    Green, J.4
  • 2
    • 42449122800 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Quality in qualitative research: Criteria for authors and assessors in the submission and assessment of qualitative research articles for the Medical Journal of Australia
    • Kitto SC, Chesters J, Grbich, C. Quality in qualitative research: Criteria for authors and assessors in the submission and assessment of qualitative research articles for the Medical Journal of Australia. Med J Aust. 2008; 188(4):243-6.
    • (2008) Med J Aust , vol.188 , Issue.4 , pp. 243-246
    • Kitto, S.C.1    Chesters, J.2    Grbich, C.3
  • 3
    • 33750593838 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Best practice' in focus group research: Making sense of different views
    • Freeman. T. 'Best practice' in focus group research: making sense of different views. J Adv Nurs. 2006;56(5):491-7.
    • (2006) J Adv Nurs , vol.56 , Issue.5 , pp. 491-497
    • Freeman, T.1
  • 4
    • 84995024293 scopus 로고
    • The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants
    • Kitzinger J. The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Soc Health Illn. 1994; 16(l):103-21.
    • (1994) Soc Health Illn , vol.16 , Issue.L , pp. 103-121
    • Kitzinger, J.1
  • 6
  • 7
    • 5644295498 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Discomfort, discord and discontinuity as data: Using focus groups to research sensitive topics
    • Wellings K, Branigan P, Mitchell K. Discomfort, discord and discontinuity as data: using focus groups to research sensitive topics. Cult Health Sex. 2000;2(3):255-67.
    • (2000) Cult Health Sex , vol.2 , Issue.3 , pp. 255-267
    • Wellings, K.1    Branigan, P.2    Mitchell, K.3
  • 8
    • 21344457956 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Making sense of focus groups
    • Barbour RS. Making sense of focus groups. Med Educ. 2005; 39:742-50.
    • (2005) Med Educ , vol.39 , pp. 742-750
    • Barbour, R.S.1
  • 9
    • 21544475898 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • It was fun... but we don't usually talk about these things: Analyzing sociable interaction in focus groups
    • Warr D. "It was fun... but we don't usually talk about these things": Analyzing sociable interaction in focus groups. Qualitative Inquiry. 2005;11(2):200-25.
    • (2005) Qualitative Inquiry , vol.11 , Issue.2 , pp. 200-225
    • Warr, D.1
  • 10
    • 65349134591 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Thomas S, Steven 1, Browning C, Dickens E, et al. Focus groups in health research: a methodological review. Health Sociology Review. 1992;2(1):7-20.
    • Thomas S, Steven 1, Browning C, Dickens E, et al. Focus groups in health research: a methodological review. Health Sociology Review. 1992;2(1):7-20.
  • 12
    • 84971585775 scopus 로고
    • Introducing focus groups
    • Kitzinger J. Introducing focus groups. BMJ. 1995;311:299-302.
    • (1995) BMJ , vol.311 , pp. 299-302
    • Kitzinger, J.1
  • 13
    • 84970325834 scopus 로고
    • Comment: Concerns in the analysis offocus group data
    • Carey MA. 'Comment: concerns in the analysis offocus group data'. Qualitative Health Research. 1995;5(4):487-95.
    • (1995) Qualitative Health Research , vol.5 , Issue.4 , pp. 487-495
    • Carey, M.A.1
  • 15
    • 0031255276 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Focus groups: Issues of analysis and interpretation
    • Reed J, Roskell Payton V Focus groups: issues of analysis and interpretation. J Adv Nurs. 1997;26:765-71.
    • (1997) J Adv Nurs , vol.26 , pp. 765-771
    • Reed, J.1    Roskell Payton, V.2
  • 16
    • 84947648743 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The essential role of social theory in qualitative public health research
    • Willis K, Daly J, Kealy M, Small I, et al. The essential role of social theory in qualitative public health research. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007;31(5): 438-43.
    • (2007) Aust N Z J Public Health , vol.31 , Issue.5 , pp. 438-443
    • Willis, K.1    Daly, J.2    Kealy, M.3    Small, I.4
  • 17
    • 35449007314 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A health researcher's guide to qualitative methodologies
    • Dew K. A health researcher's guide to qualitative methodologies. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007;31(5):433-7.
    • (2007) Aust N Z J Public Health , vol.31 , Issue.5 , pp. 433-437
    • Dew, K.1
  • 18
    • 0034859266 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Are qualitative methods misunderstood?
    • Ezzy D. Are qualitative methods misunderstood? Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001;25:294-7.
    • (2001) Aust N Z J Public Health , vol.25 , pp. 294-297
    • Ezzy, D.1
  • 19
    • 0035021961 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Focus group composition: A comparison between natural and constructed groups
    • Leask J, Hawe P Chapman S. Focus group composition: a comparison between natural and constructed groups. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001;25(2):152-4.
    • (2001) Aust N Z J Public Health , vol.25 , Issue.2 , pp. 152-154
    • Leask, J.1    Hawe, P.2    Chapman, S.3
  • 20
    • 38349018224 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Gibbs L, Kealy M, Willis K, Green J, et al. What have sampling and data collection got to do with good qualitative research?' Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007;31(6):540-4.
    • Gibbs L, Kealy M, Willis K, Green J, et al. What have sampling and data collection got to do with good qualitative research?' Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007;31(6):540-4.
  • 21
    • 0029069287 scopus 로고
    • Problems of focus group methods in cross-cultural research: A case study ofbeliefs about sudden infant death syndrome
    • Yelland J, Gifford SM. Problems of focus group methods in cross-cultural research: a case study ofbeliefs about sudden infant death syndrome. Australian Journal of Public Health. 1995;19(3):257-63.
    • (1995) Australian Journal of Public Health , vol.19 , Issue.3 , pp. 257-263
    • Yelland, J.1    Gifford, S.M.2
  • 22
    • 84947648624 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Generating best evidence from qualitative research: The role of data analysis
    • Green J, Willis K, Hughes E, Small R, et al. Generating best evidence from qualitative research: the role of data analysis. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007;31(6):545-50.
    • (2007) Aust N Z J Public Health , vol.31 , Issue.6 , pp. 545-550
    • Green, J.1    Willis, K.2    Hughes, E.3    Small, R.4
  • 23
    • 23844484979 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What about focus group interaction data?
    • Duggleby W. What about focus group interaction data? Qualitative Health Research. 2005;15(6):832-40.
    • (2005) Qualitative Health Research , vol.15 , Issue.6 , pp. 832-840
    • Duggleby, W.1
  • 24
    • 84970296333 scopus 로고
    • Overview of focus group research
    • Asbury J-E. Overview of focus group research. Qualitative Health Research. 1995;5(4):414-20.
    • (1995) Qualitative Health Research , vol.5 , Issue.4 , pp. 414-420
    • Asbury, J.-E.1
  • 25
    • 0030161617 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Focus groups: Collecting aggregate-level data to understand community health phenomena
    • Stevens PE. Focus groups: Collecting aggregate-level data to understand community health phenomena. Public Health Nursing. 1996;13(3):170-6.
    • (1996) Public Health Nursing , vol.13 , Issue.3 , pp. 170-176
    • Stevens, P.E.1
  • 26
    • 0000881626 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The analytic potential of'sensitive moments'in focus group discussions
    • Barbour RS, Kitzinger J, editors, London UK, Sage;
    • Kitzinger J, Farquhar C. The analytic potential of'sensitive moments'in focus group discussions. In: Barbour RS, Kitzinger J, editors. Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice. London (UK): Sage; 1999. p. 156-73.
    • (1999) Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice , pp. 156-173
    • Kitzinger, J.1    Farquhar, C.2
  • 27
    • 33847032547 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • From the Heart ofmy Bottorn: Negotiating Humor in Focus Group discussions
    • Wilkinson CE, Rees E, Knight LV. "From the Heart ofmy Bottorn": Negotiating Humor in Focus Group discussions. Qualitative Health Research. 2007;17: 411-37.
    • (2007) Qualitative Health Research , vol.17 , pp. 411-437
    • Wilkinson, C.E.1    Rees, E.2    Knight, L.V.3
  • 30
    • 42549143457 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Distributed decision making: The anatomy of decisions-in-action
    • Rapley T. Distributed decision making: the anatomy of decisions-in-action. Soc Health Illn. 2007;30(3):429-44.
    • (2007) Soc Health Illn , vol.30 , Issue.3 , pp. 429-444
    • Rapley, T.1
  • 31
    • 34548171939 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Non-steroidal antiinflamatory drugs in general practice: A decision-making dilemma
    • Mikhail SS, Zwar NA, Vaghoikar S, Dennis S, O'Day R. Non-steroidal antiinflamatory drugs in general practice: a decision-making dilemma. Med J Aust. 2007;187(3):160-3.
    • (2007) Med J Aust , vol.187 , Issue.3 , pp. 160-163
    • Mikhail, S.S.1    Zwar, N.A.2    Vaghoikar, S.3    Dennis, S.4    O'Day, R.5
  • 32
    • 33645729995 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Identity in focus: The use of focus groups to study the construction of collective identity
    • Munday J. Identity in focus: the use of focus groups to study the construction of collective identity. Sociology. 2006;40(1):89-105.
    • (2006) Sociology , vol.40 , Issue.1 , pp. 89-105
    • Munday, J.1
  • 33
    • 0035287733 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Focus groups as a research method: A critique of some aspects of their use in nursing research
    • Webb C, Kevern J. Focus groups as a research method: a critique of some aspects of their use in nursing research. J Adv Nurs. 2001;33(6):798-805.
    • (2001) J Adv Nurs , vol.33 , Issue.6 , pp. 798-805
    • Webb, C.1    Kevern, J.2
  • 36
    • 42249111552 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Developing theory from complexity: Reflections on a collaborative mixed method participatory action research study
    • Westhues A, Ochocka J, Jacobson N, Simich L, et al. Developing theory from complexity: reflections on a collaborative mixed method participatory action research study. Qualitative Health Research. 2008;18(5):701-17.
    • (2008) Qualitative Health Research , vol.18 , Issue.5 , pp. 701-717
    • Westhues, A.1    Ochocka, J.2    Jacobson, N.3    Simich, L.4


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.