The path from grey literature to Red Lists

Endangered Species Research

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 185-191

  Mrosovsky, N ^a   Godfrey, M H ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY MARINE LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Citations; Grey literature; IUCN; Red List; Transparency

Indexed keywords

LITERATURE REVIEW; NATURE CONSERVATION; RED LIST; TAXONOMY; TURTLE;

ERETMOCHELYS IMBRICATA; TESTUDINES;

EID: 65349171866     PISSN: 18635407     EISSN: 16134796     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3354/esr00143     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Abreu-Grobois A, Plotkin P (2007) MTSG global assessment of olive ridley turtles for the IUCN Red List. Available at: www.iucn-mtsg.org/red_list/
2. Baillie J, Groombridge B (1996) 1996 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. IUCN, Gland
3. Bernard HR, Killworth P, Kronenfeld D, Sailer L (1984) The problem of informant accuracy: the validity of retrospective data. Annu Rev Anthropol 13:495-517
4. Brackett D (1997) No red alert over conservation Red Lists. Nature 389:904
5. Carr A (1956) The windward road. Alfred A. Knopf, New York
6. Carr A, Meylan A, Mortimer J, Bjorndal K, Carr T (1982) Surveys of sea turtle populations and habitats in the western Atlantic. NOAA Tech Memo NOAA-SEFSC-91. Available at: www.sefsc.noaa.gov/seaturtletechmemos.jsp
7. Dublin HT, Smart J (2006) One programme, one voice. Species 45:3-4. Available at: http://intranet.iucn.org/webfiles/doc/SSC/SSCwebsite/ Species_/species45_web.pdf
8. Hutchinson B, Mast R, Pilcher N (2006) Marine turtle (MTSG update). Species 46:20-22. Available at: http://data.iucn.org/themes/ssc/ publications/species/species_46_hi-respdf.pdf
9. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) (2001) Guidelines for assessing taxa with widely distributed or multiple populations against Criterion A. IUCN Red List standards and petitions sub-committee, June 2001 (revised December 2001). Available at: www.iucn-mtsg.org/red_list/docs/Guidelines_widelydistspp.pdf
10. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) (2006) Release of the 2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species reveals ongoing decline of the status of plants and animals. IUCN News Release. Available at: www.natureserve.org/aboutUs/PressReleases/IUCN_Red_List_release.pdf
11. Lamoreux J, Akçakaya HR, Bennun L, Collar NJ and others (2003) Value of the IUCN Red List. Trends Ecol Evol 18: 214-215
12. Lapointe E (1997) No red alert over conservation Red Lists. Nature 389:904
13. Mace GM, Lande R (1991) Assessing extinction threats: toward a reevaluation of IUCN threatened species categories. Conserv Biol 5:148-157
14. Marcovaldi MA, Marcovaldi GG (1999) Marine turtles of Brazil: the history and structure of Projeto TAMARIBAMA. Biol Conserv 91:35-41
15. Marcovaldi MA, Lopez GG, Soares LS, Santos AJB, Bellini C, Barata PCR (2007) Fifteen years of hawksbill sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) nesting in northern Brazil. Chelonian Conserv Biol 6:223-228
16. Mathews BS (2004) Gray literature: resources for locating unpublished research. Coll Res Libr 65:125-128
17. McIlroy A (2007) Vultures vanishing-even scavengers face extinction. Globe and Mail, 13 September 2007, Toronto, Canada, p A3. Available at: www.theglobeandmail.com/servelet/story/LAC.20070913.SPECIES13/
18. Meylan A (1998) Hawksbill turtles still endangered. Nature 391:117
19. Meylan AB, Donnelly M (1999) Status justification for listing the hawksbill turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) as critically endangered on the 1996 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. Chelonian Conserv Biol 3:200-224
20. Meylan A, Castillo I, Decastro N, Ordoñez C, Troëng S, Ruiz A, Meylan P (2006) Bastimentos Island National Marine Park and Playa Chiriqui: protected areas vital to the recovery of the hawksbill turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) in Caribbean Panama. In: Frick M, Panagopoulou A, Rees AF, Williams K (eds) Book of abstracts from the 26th annual symposium on sea turtle biology and conservation. International Sea Turtle Society, Athens, p 145-146. Available at: www.seaturtle.org/ists/proceedings.php
21. Miller RM, Rodríguez JP, Aniskowicz-Fowler T, Bambaradeniya C and others (2006) Extinction risk and conservation priorities. Science 313:441
22. Mortimer JA, Donnelly M (2007) Marine Turtle Specialist Group 2007 IUCN Red List status assessment, hawksbill turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata). Available at: www.iucnmtsg.org/red_list/ei/
23. Mrosovsky N (1997) IUCN's credibility critically endangered. Nature 389:436
24. Mrosovsky N (1998) Plight of hawksbill turtles. Nature 392:646
25. S&PS (Standards and Petitions Subcommittee) (2001) Red List petition results. Species 36:31-34. Available at: http://intranet.iucn.org/ webfiles/doc/SSC/SSCwebsite/species_/species36.pdf
26. Seminoff JA, Shanker K (2008) Marine turtles and IUCN Red Listing: a review of the process, the pitfalls, and novel assessment approaches. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 356:52-68
27. SPWG (Standards and Petitions Working Group) (2008) Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List categories and criteria, Version 7.0. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Working Group of the IUCN SSC Biodiversity Assessments Sub-Committee, August 2008. Available at: http://intranet.iucn.org/webfiles/doc/SSC/RedList/RedListGuidelines.pdf
28. SPWG (Standards and Petitions Working Group) (2007) Ruling of the IUCN Red List standards and petitions working group. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org/search/details.php/11534/all
29. Zimmer C (2007) Predicting oblivion: Are existing models up to the task? Science 317:892-893