Transmission electron microscopic examination of the interface between a resin-modified glass-ionomer and Er:YAG laser-irradiated dentin

Photomedicine and Laser Surgery

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 317-323

  Delmé, Katleen I M ^a   Cardoso, Marcio Vivan ^b   Mine, Atsushi ^b   De Moor, Roeland J G ^a   Meerbeek, Bart Van ^b  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b DEPARTMENT OF IMAGING AND PATHOLOGY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAVITY PREPARATIONS; DISTILLED WATERS; ER: YAG; ER:YAG LASERS; GLASS IONOMERS; HYBRID LAYERS; IRRADIATED SAMPLES; MICRO-CRACKS; PHASE FORMATIONS; POLYALKENOIC ACIDS; RESIN-MODIFIED GLASS IONOMERS; SUB MICRONS; SUB SURFACES; SUB-SURFACE LAYERS; TEM; TRANSMISSION ELECTRONS;

COLLAGEN; CRACKS; ERBIUM; GELATION; GELS; GLASS; IONOMERS; LASER BEAM EFFECTS; MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION; PHASE INTERFACES; POLYMERS; RESINS; SURFACES;

LASERS;

COLLAGEN; DIAMOND; GLASS; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; WATER;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMINERALIZATION; DENTIN; ERBIUM YAG LASER; GEL; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MELTING POINT; PHASE CONTRAST MICROSCOPY; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTIN; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; LASER THERAPY, LOW-LEVEL; LASERS, SOLID-STATE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, TRANSMISSION; RESINS, SYNTHETIC;

EID: 65349163331     PISSN: 15495418     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/pho.2008.2278     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. De Munck, J., Van Landuyt, K., Peumans, M., et al. (2005). A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J. Dent. Res. 84, 118-132.
2. Mount, G.J. (1991). Adhesion of glass-ionomer cement in the clinical environment. Oper. Dent. 16, 141-148.
3. Titley, K.C., Smith, D.C., and Chernecky, R. (1996). SEM observations of the reactions of the components of light-activated glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement on bovine dentine. J. Dent. 24, 411-416.
4. Ferrari, M., and Davidson, C.L. (1997). Interdiffusion of a traditional glass ionomer cement into conditioned dentin. Am. J. Dent. 10, 295-297.
5. Ngo, H., Mount, G.J., and Peters, M.C. (1997). A study of glass-ionomer cement and its interface with enamel and dentin using a low-temperature, high-resolution scanning electron microscopic technique. Quintessence Int. 28, 63-69.
6. Sidhu, S.K., and Watson, T.F. (1998). Interfacial characteristics of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials: a study on fluid permeability using confocal fluorescence microscopy. J. Dent. Res. 77, 1749-1759.
7. Yoshida, Y., Van Meerbeek, B., Snauwaert, J., et al. (1999). A novel approach for AFM characterization of adhesive toothbiomaterial interfaces. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 47, 85-90.
8. Peumans, M., Kanumilli, P., De Munck, J., Van Landuyt, K., Lambrechts, P., and Van Meerbeek, B. (2005). Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesive: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent. Mater. 21, 864-881.
9. Van Meerbeek, B., Vargas, M., Inoue, S., et al. (2000). Microscopy investigations. Techniques, results, limitations. Am. J. Dent. 13, 3D-18D.
10. Tay, F.R., Smales, R.J., Ngo, H., Wei, S.H., and Pashley, D.H. (2001). Effect of different conditioning protocols on adhesion of a GIC to dentin. J. Adhes. Dent. 3, 153-167.
11. Tay, F.R., Sidhu, S.K., Watson, T.F., and Pashley, D.H. (2004). Water-dependent interfacial transition zone in resin-modified glass-ionomer cement/dentin interfaces. J. Dent. Res. 83, 644-649.
12. Coutinho, E., Van Landuyt, K., De Munck, J., et al. (2006). Development of a self-etch adhesive for resin-modified glass ionomers. J. Dent. Res. 85, 349-353.
13. Coutinho, E., Yoshida, Y., Inoue, S., et al. (2007). Gel phase formation at resin-modified glass-ionomer/tooth interfaces. J. Dent. Res. 86, 656-661.
14. De Moor, R.J.G., and Delmé, K.I.M. (2006). Erbium lasers and adhesion to tooth structure. J. Oral Laser Appl. 6, 7-21.
15. Delmé, K.I.M., Deman, P.J., De Bruyne, M.A.A., and De Moor, R.J.G. (2006). Influence of different Er:YAG laser energies and frequencies on the surface morphology of dentin and enamel. J. Oral Laser Appl. 6, 43-52.
16. Delmé, K.I.M., and De Moor, R.J.G. (2007). Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of enamel and dentin surfaces after Er:YAG laser preparation and laser conditioning. Photomed. Laser Surg. 25, 393-401.
17. Perdigão, J., Lambrechts, P., Van Meerbeek, B., Vanherle, G., and Lopes, A.L. (1995). Field emission SEM comparison of four post fixation drying techniques for human dentin. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 29, 1111-1120.
18. Van Meerbeek, B., Yoshida, Y., Lambrechts, P., et al. (1998). A TEM study of two water-based adhesive systems bonded to dry and wet dentin. J. Dent. Res. 77, 50-59.
19. Gladys, S., Van Meerbeek, B., Braem, M., Lambrechts, P., and Vanherle, G. (1997). Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J. Dent. Res. 76, 883-894.
20. Smith, D.C. (1968). A new dental cement. Br. Dent. J. 124, 381-384.
21. Wilson, A.D., and Kent, B.E. (1972). A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement. Br. Dent. J. 132, 133-135.
22. Yip, H.K., Tay, F.R., Ngo, H.C., Smales, R.J., and Pashley, D.H. (2001). Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to dentin. Dent. Mater. 17, 456-470.
23. Yoshida, Y., Van Meerbeek, B., Nakayama, Y., et al. (2000). Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial-hard tissue interfaces. J. Dent. Res. 79, 709-714.
24. Fukuda, R., Yoshida, Y., Nakayama, Y., et al. (2003). Bonding efficacy of polyalkenoic acids to hydroxyapatite, enamel and dentin. Biomaterials. 24, 1861-1867.
25. Van Meerbeek, B., De Munck, J., Yoshida, Y., et al. (2003). Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper. Dent. 28, 215-235.
26. Shimada, Y., Kondo, Y., Inokoshi, S., Tagami, J., and An- tonucci, J.M. (1999). Demineralizing effect of dental cements on human dentin. Quintessence Int. 30, 267-273.
27. Inoue, H., Inoue, S., Uno, S., Takahashi, A., Koasa, K., and Sano, H. (2001). Microtensile bond strength of two single- step adhesive systems to bur-prepared dentin. J. Adhes. Dent. 3, 129-136.
28. Mount, G.J. (1995). Some physical and biological properties of glass ionomer cement. Int. Dent. J. 45, 135-140.
29. Van Meerbeek, B., Vargas, M., Inoue, S., et al. (2001). Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Oper. Dent. 26, S119-S144.
30. Friedl, K.H., Powers, J.M., and Hiller, K.A. (1995). Influence of different factors on bond strength of hybrid ionomers. Oper. Dent. 20, 74-80.
31. Yiu, C.K., Tay, F.R., King, N.M., et al. (2004). Interaction of glass-ionomer cements with moist dentin. J. Dent. Res. 83, 283-289.
32. Pereira, P.N., Yamada, T., Tei, R., and Tagami, J. (1997). Bond strength and interface micromorphology of an improved resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Am. J. Dent. 10, 128-132.
33. Aoki, A., Ishikawa, I., Yamada, T., et al. (1998). Comparison between Er:YAG laser and conventional technique for root caries treatment in vitro. J. Dent. Res. 77, 1404-1414.
34. Inoue, S., Van Meerbeek, B., Abe, Y., et al. (2001). Effect of remaining dentin thickness and the use of conditioner on micro-tensile bond strength of a glass-ionomer adhesive. Dent. Mater. 17, 445-455.
35. Visuri, S.R., Gilbert, J.L., Wright, D.D., Wighdor, H.A., and Walsh, J.T. Jr. (1996). Shear strength of composite bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin. J. Dent. Res. 75, 599-605.
36. Dostalova, T., Jelinkova, H., Kucerova, H., et al. (1978). Noncontact Er:YAG laser ablation: clinical evaluation. J. Clin. Laser Med. Surg. 16, 273-282.
37. Armengol, V., Jean, A., Rohanizadeh, R., and Hamel, H. (1999). Scanning electron microscopic analysis of diseased and healthy dental hard tissues after Er:YAG laser irradiation: in vitro study. J. Endod. 25, 543-546.
38. De Munck, J., Van Meerbeek, B., Yudhira, R., Lambrechts, P., and Vanherle, G. (2002). Micro-tensile bond strength of two adhesives to erbium:YAG-lased vs. bur-cut enamel and dentin. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 110, 322-329.
39. Kataumi, M., Nakajima, M., Yamada, T., and Tagami, J. (1998). Tensile bond strength and SEM evaluation of Er:YAG laser irradiated dentin using dentin adhesive. Dent. Mater. J. 17, 125-138.
40. Delmé, K.I.M., Deman, P.J., Nammour, S., and De Moor, R.J.G. (2006). Microleakage of class V glass ionomer restorations after conventional and Er:YAG laser preparation. Pho- tomed. Laser Surg. 24, 715-722.
41. Cardoso, M.V., Coutinho, E., Ermis, R.B., et al. (2008). Influence of Er,Cr:YSGG laser treatment on the microtensile bond strength of adhesives to dentin. J. Adhes. Dent. 10, 25-33.
42. Ceballos, L., Toledano, M., Osorio, R., Tay, F.R., and Marshall, G.W. (2002). Bonding to Er:YAG laser-treated dentin. J. Dent. Res. 81, 119-122.