Microleakage of class V glass ionomer restorations after conventional and Er:YAG laser preparation

Photomedicine and Laser Surgery

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 715-722

  Delme, Katleen Ilse Maria ^a   Deman, Peter Jean ^a   Nammour, Samir ^b   De Moor, Roeland Jozef Gentil ^a,c  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^c GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINES; ENAMELS; GLASS; LASER BEAM EFFECTS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

ACRYLIC RESIN; CONVENTIONAL GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS (CGIC); IONOMER RESTORATIONS; MICROLEAKAGE;

IONOMERS;

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; CEMENT; GLASS; METHYLENE BLUE;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL LASER ETCHING; DENTIN; ENAMEL; ERBIUM YAG LASER; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH FILLING; VISCOSITY;

DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL LEAKAGE; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; LASERS; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIALS;

EID: 33846230601     PISSN: 15495418     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/pho.2006.24.715     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Hibst, R., and Keller, U. (1989). Experimental studies of the application of the Er:YAG laser on dental hard substances: I. Measurement of the ablation rate. Lasers Surg. Med. 9, 338-344.
2. Keller, U., and Hibst, R. (1989). Experimental studies on the application of the Er:YAG laser on dental hard substances: II. Light microscopic and SEM investigations. Lasers Surg. Med. 9, 345-351.
3. Burkes, E.J., Hoke, J., Gomes, E., et al. (1992). Wet versus dry enamel ablation by Er:YAG laser. J. Prosthet. Dent. 67, 847-851.
4. Cozean, C., Arcoria, C.J., Pelagalli, J., et al. (1997). Dentistry for the 21st century? Erbium:YAG laser for teeth. J. Dent. Res. 128, 1080-1087.
5. Pelagalli, J., Gimbel, C.B., Hansen, R.T., et al. (1997). Investigational study of the use of Er:YAG laser versus dental drill for caries removal and cavity preparation- phase I. J. Clin. Laser Med. Surg. 15, 109-115.
6. Aoki, A., Ishikawa, I., Yamada, K., et al. (1998). Comparison between Er:YAG laser and conventional technique for root caries treatment in vitro. J. Dent. Res. 77, 1404-1414.
7. Hibst, R. (2002). Lasers for caries removal and cavity preparation: state of the art and future directions. J. Oral Laser Appl. 2, 203-212.
8. Cavalanti, B.N., Lage-Marques, J.L., and Rode, S.M. (2003). Pulpal temperature increases with Er:YAG laser and high-speed handpieces. J. Prosthet. Dent. 90, 447-451.
9. Oelgiesser, D., Blasbalg, J., and Ben-Amar, A. (2003). Cavity preparation by Er:YAG laser on pulpal temperature rise. Am. J. Dent. 16, 96-98.
10. Curti, M., Rocca, J.P., Bertrand, M.F., et al. (2004). Morphostructural aspects of Er:YAG-prepared class V cavities. J. Clin. Laser Med. Surg. 22, 119-123.
11. Van As, G. (2004). Erbium lasers in dentistry. Dent. Clin. North Am. 48, 1017-1059.
12. De Moor, R.J.G., and Delmé, K.I.M. (2006). Erbium lasers and adhesion to tooth structure. J. Oral Laser Appl. 6, 7-21.
13. Delmé, K.I.M., Deman P.J., De Bruyne, M.A.A., et al. (2006). Influence of different Er:YAG laser energies and frequencies on the surface morphology of dentin and enamel. J. Oral Laser Appl. 6, 43-52.
14. Ceballos, L., Osorio, R., Toledano, M., et al. (2001). Microleakage of composite restorations after acid or Er-YAG laser cavity treatments. Dent. Mater. 17, 340-346.
15. Armengol, V., Jean, A., Enkel, B., et al. (2002). Microleakage of class V composite restorations following Er:YAG and Nd:YAP laser irradiation compared to acid-etch: an in vitro study. Lasers Med. Sci. 17, 93-100.
16. Ceballos, L., Toledano, M., Osorio, R., et al. (2002). Bonding to Er:YAG-laser-treated dentin. J. Dent. Res. 81, 119-122.
17. Gonzalez Bahillo, J., Ruiz Pinon, M., and Rodriguez Nogueira, J. (2002). A comparative study of microleakage through enamel and cementum after laser Er:YAG instrumentation in class V cavity obturations, using scanning electron microscopy. J. Clin. Laser Med. Surg. 20, 197-201.
18. Niu, W., Eto, J.N., Kimura, Y., et al. (1998). A study on microleakage after resin filling of class V cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser. J. Clin. Laser Med. Surg. 16, 227-231.
19. Shigetani, Y., Tate, Y., Okamoto, A., et al. (2002). A study of cavity preparation by Er:YAG laser. Effects on the marginal leakage of composite resin restoration. Dent. Mater. J. 21, 238-249.
20. Delmé, K.I.M., Deman, P.J., and De Moor, R.J.G. (2005). Microleakage of class V composite restorations after conventional and Er:YAG laser preparation. J. Oral Rehabil. 32, 1-10.
21. Palma Dibb, R.G., Milori Corona, S.A., Borsatto, M.C., et al. (2002). Assessing microleakage on class V composite resin restorations after Er:YAG laser preparation varying the adhesive systems. J. Clin. Laser Med. Surg. 30, 141-146.
22. Khan, M.F., Yonaga, K., Kimura, Y., et al. (1998). Study of microleakage at Class I cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser using three types of restorative materials. J. Clin. Laser Med. Surg. 16, 305-308.
23. Quo, B.C., Drummond, J.L., Koerber, A., et al. (2002). Glass ionomer microleakage from preparations by an Er/YAG laser or a high-speed handpiece. J. Dent. 30, 141-146.
24. Corona, S.A.M., Borsatto, M.C., Pecora, J.D., et al. (2003). Assessing microleakage of different class V restorations after Er:YAG laser and bur preparation. J. Oral Rehabil. 30, 1008-1014.
25. Corona, S.A., Menezes, M., Borsatto, M.C., et al. (2003). Influence of Er:YAG laser on Tensile bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements to dentin. J. Oral Laser Appl. 3, 21-25.
26. Chinelatti, M.A., Ramos, R.P., Chimello, D.T., et al. (2004). Influence of the use of Er:YAG laser for cavity preparation and surface treatment in microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations. Oper. Dent. 29, 430-436.
27. Kerby, R.E., and Knobloch, L. (1992). Strength characteristics of glass-ionomer cements. Oper. Dent. 17, 170-174.
28. Wilson, A.D., and McLean, J.W. (1988). Biocompatibility, in: Glass-Ionomer Cement. A.D. Wilson, and J.W. McLean (eds.). Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co., pp. 125-130.
29. Saito, S., Tosaki, S., and Hirota, K. (1999). Characteristics of glass-ionomer cements, in: Advances in Glass Ionomer Cements. C. Davidson and I. Mjör (eds.). Chicago: Quintessence, pp. 15-50.
30. Van Meerbeek, B., Inoue, S., Perdigao, J., et al. (2001). Enamel and dentin adhesion, in: Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry; A Contemporary Approach. J.B. Summit, J.W. Robbins, and R.S. Schwartz (eds.). Chicago: Quintessence, pp. 178-235.
31. Hotz, P., McLean, J.W., Seed, I., et al. (1977). The bonding of glass ionomer cements to metal and tooth substrates. Br. Dent. J. 142, 41-47.
32. Powis, D.R., Folleras, T., Merson, S.A., et al. (1982). Improved adhesion of a glass ionomer cement to dentin and enamel. J. Dent. Res. 61, 1416-1422.
33. Arweiler, N.B., Auschill, T.M., and Reich, E. (2000). Does pre-treatment of cavities effectively promote good marginal adaptation of glass-ionomer cements? J. Adhes. Dent. 2, 289-295.
34. Glasspoole, E.A., Erickson, R.L., and Davidson, C.L. (2002). Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of glass ionomers to enamel. Dent. Mater. 18, 454-462.
35. Inoue, S., Abe, Y., Yoshida, Y., et al. (2004). Effect of conditioner on bond strength of glass-ionomer adhesive to dentin/enamel with and without smear layer interposition. Oper. Dent. 29, 685-692.
36. Delmé, K.I.M., and De Moor, R.J.G. (2003). A scanning electron microscopic comparison of different caries removal techniques for root caries treatment. J. Oral Laser Appl. 4, 235-242.
37. Watson, T.F., Billington, R.W., and Williams, J.A. (1991). The interfacial region of the tooth/glass ionomer restoration: a confocal optical microscope study. Am. J. Dent. 4, 303-310.
38. Watson, T.F., and Bannerjee, A. (1993). The effectiveness of glass-ionomer surface protection treatments: a scanning optical microscope study. Eur. J. Prosthodont. Restor. Dent. 2, 85-90.
39. Watson, T.F., Pagliari, D., Sidhu, S.K., et al. (1998). Confocal microscopic observation of structural changes in glass-ionomer cements and tooth interfaces. Biomaterials 19, 581-588.
40. Wilson, A.D., and Paddon, J.M. (1993). Dimensional changes occurring in a glass ionomer cement. Am. J. Dent. 6, 280-282.
41. Armengol, V., Jean, A., Rohanizadeh, R., et al. (1999). Scanning electron microscopic analysis of diseased and healthy dental hard tissues after Er:YAG laser irradiation; in vitro study. J. Endod. 25, 543-546.
42. Watson, T.F. (1999). Bonding glass-ionomer cements to tooth structure, in: Advances in Glass Ionomer Cements. C. Davidson and I. Mjör (eds.). Chicago: Quintessence, pp. 121-135.
43. Fleming, G.J.P., Kenny, S.M., and Barralet, J.E. (2006). The optimisation of the initial viscosity of an encapsulated glass-ionomer restorative following different mechanical mixing regimes. J. Dent. 43, 155-163.
44. Wilson, A.D., and McLean, J.W. (1988). Composition, in: Glass-Ionomer Cement. A.D. Wilson and J.W. McLean (eds.). Chicago: Quintessence, pp. 21-42.
45. de Gee, A.J. (1999) Physical properties of glass-ionomer cements: setting shrinkage and wear, in: Advances in Glass Ionomer Cements. C. Davidson and I. Mjör (eds.). Chicago: Quintessence, pp. 121-135.