Involvement of the ipsilateral and contralateral cerebellum in the acquisition of unilateral classical eyeblink conditioning in guinea pigs

Acta Pharmacologica Sinica

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 141-152

  Hu, Bo ^a   Lin, Xi ^a   Huang, Lü Shuai ^a   Yang, Li ^a   Feng, Hua ^a   Sui, Jian Feng ^a  

^a THIRD MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Acquisition; Cerebellar cortex; Classical conditioning; Deep cerebellar nuclei; Eyeblink; Muscimol

Indexed keywords

4 AMINOBUTYRIC ACID A RECEPTOR STIMULATING AGENT; MUSCIMOL; 4 AMINOBUTYRIC ACID RECEPTOR STIMULATING AGENT;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CEREBELLUM; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYELID REFLEX; GUINEA PIG; HISTOLOGY; LEARNING; MALE; MICROINJECTION; NONHUMAN; ANIMAL; BLINKING; CONDITIONED REFLEX; DRUG EFFECT; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; METABOLISM; NERVE CELL; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BLINKING; CEREBELLUM; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; GABA AGONISTS; GUINEA PIGS; MALE; MICROINJECTIONS; MUSCIMOL; NEURONS;

EID: 65349136922     PISSN: 16714083     EISSN: 17457254     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/aps.2008.18     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Christian KM, Thompson RF. Neural substrates of eyeblink conditioning: acquisition and retention. Learn Mem 2003; 11: 427-55.
2. Rogers RF, Britton GB, Steinmetz JE. Learning-related interpositus activity is conserved across species as studied during eyeblink conditioning in the rat. Brain Res 2001; 905: 171-7.
3. Green JT, Arenos JD. Hippocampal and cerebellar single-unit activity during delay and trace eyeblink conditioning in the rat. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2007; 87: 269-84.
4. Lincoln JS, McCormick DA, Thompson RF. Ipsilateral cerebellar lesions prevent learning of the classically conditioned nictitating membrane/eyelid response. Brain Res 1982; 323: 190-3.
5. Lavond DG, Hembree TL, Thompson RF. Effect of kainic acid lesions of the cerebellar interpositus nucleus on eyelid conditioning in the rabbit. Brain Res 1985; 326: 179-82.
6. Welsh JP, Harvey JA. Pavlovian conditioning in the rabbit during inactivation of the interpositus. J Physiol (London) 1991; 444: 459-80.
7. Clark RE, Zhang AA, Lavond DG. Reversible lesions of the cerebellar interpositus nucleus during acquisition and retention of a classically conditioned behavior. Behav Neurosci 1992; 106: 879-88.
8. Krupa DJ, Thompson JK, Thompson RF. Localization of a memory trace in the mammalian brain. Science 1993; 260: 989-91.
9. Hardiman MJ, Ramnani N, Yeo CH. Reversible inactivations of cerebellum with muscimol prevent the acquisition and extinction of conditioned nictitating membrane responses in the rabbit. Exp Brain Res 1996; 110: 235-47.
10. McCormick DA, Lavond DG, Clark GA, Kettner RE, Rising CE, Thompson RF. The engram found? Role of the cerebellum in classical conditioning of nictitating membrane and eyelid responses. Bull Psychon Soc 1981; 18: 103-5.
11. Miller MJ, Chen NK, Li BL, Tom B, Weiss C, Disterhoft JF, et alfMRI of the conscious rabbit during unilateral classical eyeblink conditioning reveals bilateral cerebellar activation. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 11753-8.
12. Park J, Onodera T, Nishimura S, Thompson RF, Itohara S. Molecular evidence for two-stage learning and partial laterality in eyeblink conditioning of mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 103: 5549-54.
13. Logan CG, Grafton ST. Functional anatomy of human eyeblink conditioning determined with regional cerebellar glucose metabolism and positron-emission tomography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92: 7500-4.
14. Blaxton TA, Zeffiro TA, Gabrieli JD, Bookheimer SY, Carrillo MC, Theodore WH, et al. Functional mapping of human learning: a positron-emission tomography activation study of eyeblink conditioning. J Neurosci 1996; 16: 4032-40.
15. Dimitrova A, Weber J, Maschke M, Elles HG, Kolb FP, Forsting M, et al. Eyeblink-related areas in human cerebellum as shown by fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 2002; 17: 100-15.
16. Krogsgaard-Larsen P, Johnston GA. Structure-activity studies on the inhibition of GABA binding to rat brain membrane by muscimiol and related compounds. J Neurochem 1978; 30: 1377-1382.
17. Palacios JM, Young WS, Kuhar MJ. Autoradiographic localization of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors in the rat cerebellum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1980; 77: 670-4.
18. Sastry BR, Morishita W, Yip S, Shew T. GABA-ergic transmission in deep cerebellar nuclei. Prog Neurobiol 1997; 53: 259-71.
19. Rapisarda C, Bacchelli B. The brain of the guinea pig in stereotaxic coordinates. Arch Sci Biol 1977; 61: 1-37.
20. Yeo CH, Lobo DH, Baum A. Acquisition of a new-latency conditioned nictitating membrane response-major, but not complete, dependence on the ipsilateral cerebellum. Learn Mem 1997; 3: 557-77.
21. Hu B, Lin X, Xiong Y, Huang W, Liu G, Sui J. Activity of single granule cell in the dentate gyrus of guinea pig during the consolidation of trace eyeblink conditioned responses. Prog Biochem Biophys 2006; 33: 1051-60.
22. Hu B, Yang L, Huang W, Sui J. A comparison of the spontaneous firing patterns between principal cells and fast spiking interneurons from dentate gyrus in waking guinea pigs. Neurosci Bull 2006; 22: 21-8.
23. Kotani S, Kawahara S, Kirino Y. Trace eyeblink conditioning in decerebrate guinea pigs. Eur J Neurosci 2003; 17: 1445-54.
24. Krupa DJ, Thompson RF. Reversible inactivation of the cerebellar interpositus nucleus completely prevents acquisition of the classcially conditioned eye-blink response. Learn Mem 1997; 3: 545-56.
25. Edeline JM, Hars B, Hennevin E, Cotillon N. Muscimol diffusion after intracerebral microinjections: a reevaluation based on electrophysiological and autoradiographic quantifications. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2002; 78:100-24.
26. Martin J. Autoradiographic estimation of the extent of reversible inactivation produced by microinjection of lidocaine and muscimol in the rat. Neurosci Lett 1991; 24: 160-4.
27. Katz DB, Steinmetz JE. Sigle-unit evidence for eye-blink conditioning in cerebellar cortex is altered, but no eliminated, by interpositus nucleus lesions. Learn Mem 1997; 3: 88-104.
28. Bengtsson F, Hesslow G. Cerebellar control of the inferior olive. Cerebellum 2006; 5: 7-14.
29. McCormick DA, Thompson RF. Cerebellum: essential involvement in the classically conditioned eyelid response. Science 1984; 223: 296-9.
30. Bao S, Chen L, Kim JJ, Thompson RF. Cerebellar cortical inhibition and classical eyeblink conditioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 1592-7.
31. Wada N, Kishimoto Y, Watanabe D, Kano M, Hirano T, Funabiki K. Conditioned eyeblink learning is formed and stored without cerebellar granule cell transmission. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104: 16690-5.
32. Morcuende S, Delgado-Garcia JM, Ugolini G. Neuronal premotor networks involved in eyelid responses: retrograde transneuronal tracing with rabies virus from the orbicularis oculi muscle in the rat. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 8808-18.
33. Van Ham JJ, Yeo CH. Somatosensory trigeminal projections to the inferior olive, cerebellum and other precerebellar nuclei in rabbits. Eur J Neurosci 1992; 4: 302-17.
34. Albus JS. A theory of cerebellar function. Math Biosci 1971; 10: 25-61.
35. Marr D. Theory of cerebellar cortex. J Physiol 1969; 202: 437-70.
36. Ivarsson M, Hesslow G. Bilateral control of the orbicularis oculi muscle by one cerebellar hemisphere in the ferret. Neuroreport 1993; 4: 1127-30.
37. Bao S, Chen L, Kim JJ, Thompson RF. Cerebellar cortical inhibition and classical eyeblink conditioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 1592-7.
38. Garcia KS, Mauk MD. Pharmacological analysis of cerebellar contribution to the timing and expression of conditioned eyelid responses. Neuropharmacology 1998; 37: 471-80.
39. Lavond DG, Steinmetz JE. Acquisition of classical eyeblink conditioning without cerebellar cortex. Behav Brain Res1989; 33: 113-64.
40. Attwell PJE, Rahman S, Yeo CH. Acquisition of eyeblink conditioning is critical dependent on normal function in cerebellar cortical lobule HVI. J Neurosci 2001; 21: 5715-22.