Value of cytopathologist-performed ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration as a screening test for ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy in nonpalpable breast masses

Diagnostic Cytopathology

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 262-269

  Lieu, David ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Breast FNA; Core needle; Cytopathologist per formed; Screening test; Ultrasound guided FNA

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST TUMOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTODIAGNOSIS; CYTOPATHOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PATHOLOGIST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCREENING; ULTRASOUND;

EID: 65349124239     PISSN: 87551039     EISSN: 10970339     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dc.20984     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Cobb CJ, Raza AS. Obituary: Alas poor FNA of breast-We knew thee well! Diagn Cytopathol 2005;32:1-4.
2. Pisano ED, Fajardo LL, Tsimikas J, et al. Rate of insufficient samples for fine-needle aspiration for non-palpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: The radiologic diagnostic oncology group 5 study. The RDOG5 investigators. Cancer 1998;82:679-688.
3. Chaiwun B, Thorner P. Fine needle aspiration for evaluation of breast masses. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007;19:48-55.
4. Berner A, Davidson B, Sigstad E, Risberg B. Fine-needle aspiration cytology vs. core biopsy in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Diagn Cytopathol 2004;30:325-331.
5. Westenend PJ, Sever AR, Beekman-de Volder HJC, Liem SJ. A comparison of aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in the evaluation of breast lesions. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2001;93:146-150.
6. Shannon J, Douglas-Jones AG, Dallimore NS. Conversion to core biopsy in preoperative diagnosis of breast lesions: Is it justified by results? J Clin Pathol 2001;54:762-765.
7. Qureshi NA, Beresford A, Sami S, et al. Imprint cytology of needle core-biopsy specimens of breast lesions: Is it a useful adjunct to rapid assessment breast clinics? Breast 2007;16:81-85.
8. Sneige N, Tulbah A. Accuracy of cytologic diagnoses made from touch preps of image-guided needle biopsy specimens of nonpalp-able breast abnormalities. Diagn Cytopathol 2000;23:29-34.
9. Lieske B, Ravichandran D, Wright D. Role of fine-needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy in the preoperative diagnosis of screen-detected breast carcinoma. BR J Cancer 2006;95:62-66.
10. Lieu D. Cytopathologist-performed ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and core-needle biopsy: A prospective study of 500 consecutive cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2008;36:317-324.
11. Ljung BM, Drejet A, Chiampi N, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration biopsy is determined by physician training in sampling technique. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2001;93:263-268.
12. Ibrahim AEK, Bateman AC, Theaker JM, et al. The role of histo-logical classification of needle core biopsy in comparison with fine needle aspiration cytology in the preoperative assessment of impalpable breast lesions. J Clin Pathol 2001;54:121-125.
13. He Q, Fan X, Luan T, et al. Eleven years of experience reveals that fine-needle aspiration cytology is still a useful method for preopera-tive diagnosis of breast cancer. Breast 2007;16:303-306.
14. Manfrin E, Mariotto R, Remo A, et al. Is there still a role for fine-needle aspiration cytology in breast cancer screening? Experience of the Verona mammographic screening program with real-time integrated radiopathologic activity (1999-2004). Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2008;114:74-82.
15. Sanchez MA, Stahl RE. Fine-needle aspiration of the breast: Obsolete or state of the art? Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2008;114:65- 66.
16. Sun W, Li A, Abreo F, et al. Comparison of fine-needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy for diagnosis of breast cancer. Diagn Cytopathol 2001;24:421-425.
17. Garg S, Mohan H, Bal A, et al. A comparative analysis of core-needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology in the evaluation of palpable and mammographically detected suspicious breast lesions. Diagn Cytopathol 2008;35:681-689.
18. Hatada T, Ishii H, Ichii S, et al. Diagnostic value of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration, core-needle biopsy, and evaluation of combined use in the diagnosis of breast lesions. J Am Coll Surg 2000;190:299-303.
19. Hatada T, Aoki I, Okada K, et al. Usefulness of ultrasound-guided, fine-needle aspiration biopsy for palpable breast tumors. Arch Surg 1996;131:1095-1098.
20. Houssami N, Ciatto S, Ambrogetti D, et al. Florence-Sydney breast biopsy study: Sensitivity of ultrasound-guided versus freehand fine needle biopsy of palpable breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005;89:55-59.
21. Stavros AT. Breast Ultrasound. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004. p 1-15,147-150.
22. Lim JC, Al-Masri H, Salhadar A, et al. The significance of the diagnosis of atypia in breast fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 2004;31:285-288.
23. Liao J, Davey DD, Warren G, et al. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy remains a valid approach in the evaluation of non-palpable breast lesions. Diagn Cytopathol 2003;29:344-388.
24. Lau SK, McKee GT, Weir MM, et al. The negative predictive value of breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy: The Massachusetts General Hospital experience. Breast J 2004;10:487-491.
25. Bedrossian CWM. Cytopathology: A global perspective. Diagn Cytopathol 2008;35:745-748.