Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy Remains a Valid Approach in the Evaluation of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions

Diagnostic Cytopathology

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 325-331

  Liao, Jim ^a   Davey, Diane D ^a   Warren, Graham ^a   Davis, Joseph ^a   Moore, Angela R ^a   Samayoa, Luis M ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b LEXINGTON VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c MS 157 ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Breast; Carcinoma; Cytology; Nonpalpable lesion; Probabilistic reporting; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; BREAST PAPILLOMA; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTODIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA; FEMALE; FIBROADENOMA; HUMANS; HYPERPLASIA; PALPATION; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 2342642274     PISSN: 87551039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dc.20068     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, Marzoni FA Jr, Finkelstein SI, Shepard MJ. Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 1999;210:799-805.
2. Parker S. Stereotactic core biopsy: a return of the nattering nabobs of negativism. Acad Radiol 2000;7:225-227.
3. Westenend PJ, Sever AR, Beekman-De Volder HJ, Liem SJ. A comparison of aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in the evaluation of breast lesions. Cancer 2001;93:146-150.
4. Kopans DB. Breast imaging, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998.
5. Tohno E, Cosgrove DO, Sloane JP. Ultrasound diagnosis of breast diseases. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1994.
6. Abati A, Abele J, Bacus S, et al. The uniform approach to breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;16:295-311.
7. Boerner S, Fornage BD, Singletary E, Sneige N. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of nonpalpable breast lesions: a review of 1885 FNA cases using the National Cancer Institute-supported recommendations on the uniform approach to breast FNA. Cancer 1999;87:19-24.
8. Saarela AO, Kiviniemi HO, Rissanen TJ, Paloneva TK. Nonpalpable breast lesions: pathologic correlation of ultrasonographically guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. J Ultrasound Med 1996;15:549-553.
9. Apesteguia L, Pina L, Inchusta M, et al. Nonpalpable, well-defined, probably benign breast lesion: management by fine-needle aspiration biopsy and long-interval follow-up mammography. Eur Radiol 1997;7:1235-1239.
10. Ciatto S, Rosselli del Turco M, Ambrogetti D, et al. Solid nonpalpable breast lesions: success and failure of guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in a consecutive series of 2444 cases. Acta Radiol 1997;38:815-820.
11. Page DL, Johnson JE, Dupont WD. Probabilistic approach to the reporting of fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast. Cancer 1997;81:6-9.
12. Tabbara SO, Frost AR, Stoler MH, Sneige N, Sidawy MK. Changing trends in breast fine-needle aspiration: results of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Survey. Diagn Cytopathol 2000;22:126-130.
13. Ballo MS, Sneige N. Can core needle biopsy replace fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of palpable breast carcinoma: a comparative study of 124 women. Cancer 1996;78:773-777.
14. Liberman L, Cohen MA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Hann LE, Rosen PP. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions: an indication for surgical biopsy. Am J Roentgenol 1995;164:1111-1113.
15. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP, et al. Stereotaxic core biopsy of breast carcinoma: accuracy at predicting invasion. Radiology 1995;194:379-381.
16. Symmans WF, Weg N, Gross J, et al. A prospective comparison of stereotaxic fine-needle aspiration versus stereotaxic core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of mammographic abnormalities. Cancer 1999;85:1119-1132.
17. Pisano ED, Fajardo LL, Tsimikas J, et al. Rate of insufficient samples for fine-needle aspiration for nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group 5 Study. Cancer 1998;82:679-688.
18. Sneige N, Fornage BD, Saleh G. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of nonpalpable breast lesions: cytologic and histologic findings. Am J Clin Pathol 1994;102:98-101.
19. Wang HH, Ducatman BS. Fine needle aspiration of the breast: a probabilistic approach to diagnosis of carcinoma. Acta Cytol 1998;42:285-289.
20. Kinney WK, Manos MM, Hurley LB, Ransley JE. Where's the high-grade cervical neoplasia? the importance of minimally abnormal Papanicolaou diagnoses. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:973-976.
21. Kurtz JM, Jacquemier J, Torhorst J, et al. Conservation therapy for breast cancers other than infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Cancer 1989;63:1630-1635.
22. Hortobagyi GN, Ames FC, Buzdar AU, et al. Management of stage III primary breast cancer with primary chemotherapy, surgery and radiation therapy. Cancer 1998;62:2507-2516.
23. Chhieng DC, Fernandez G, Cangiarella JF, et al. Invasive carcinoma in clinically suspicious breast masses diagnosed as adenocarcinoma by fine-needle aspiration. Cancer 2000;90:96-101.
24. Lagios MD, Margolin FR, Westdahl PR, Rose MR. Mammographically detected duct carcinoma in situ: frequency of local recurrence following tylectomy and prognostic effect of nuclear grade on local recurrence. Cancer 1989;63:618-624.
25. Fornage BD. Sonographically guided needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. J Clin Ultrasound 1999;27:385-398.