Primary ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement versus metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in young active patients

Orthopedics

Volumn 31, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1078-

  Pattyn, C ^a   De Smet, K A ^b  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^b ANCA Clinic   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AVASCULAR NECROSIS; CERAMIC PROSTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP DISLOCATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METAL ON METAL HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; CERAMICS; CONVALESCENCE; EQUIPMENT; FEMUR HEAD NECROSIS; HEALTH SURVEY; HIP; HIP INJURY; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CERAMICS; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD NECROSIS; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HIP INJURIES; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; METALS; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 65349098019     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20081101-23     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Langdon IJ, Bannister GC. Cemented hip replacements in patients younger than 50 years: 16-24 year results. Hip International. 1999; 9(2):151-153. (Pubitemid 29476017)
2. Margevicius KJ, Bauer TW, McMahon JT. Isolation and characterization of debris in membranes around total joint prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994; 76(11):1664-1675. (Pubitemid 24372019)
3. Horowitz SM, Doty SB, Lane JM. Studies of the mechanism by which the mechanical failure of polymethylmethacrylate leads to bone resorption. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993; 75(6):802-813. (Pubitemid 23206694)
4. Wroblewski BM, Taylor GW, Siney P. Charnley low-friction arthroplasty: 19 to 25 year results. Orthopedics. 1992; 15(4):421-424.
5. Sedel L, Kerboull L, Christel P, Meunier A, Witvoet J. Alumina-on-alumina hip replacement: results and survivorship in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990; 72(4):658-663. (Pubitemid 20221122)
6. Sedel L, Nizard R, Kerboull L, Witvoet J. Alumina-on-alumina hip replacement in patients younger than 50 years old. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; (298):175-183. (Pubitemid 24023606)
7. Amstutz HC, Sparling EA, Grigoris P, Campbell PA. Surface replacement: the hip replacement of the future? Hip International. 1998. 8(2):187-207.
8. McMinn D, Treacy R, Lin K, et al. Metal-on-metal surface replacement of the hip: experience of the McMinn prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; (329S):S89-S98.
9. Amstutz HC, Grigoris P. Metal-on-metal bearings in hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; (329S):S11-S34.
10. McMinn D. Development of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Hip International. 2003; 13(suppl 2):S41-S53.
11. Daniel J, Pynsent P, McMinn D. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86:177-184. (Pubitemid 38386853)
12. Hip disease-metal on metal hip resurfacing. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Web site. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/TA44. Updated February 2005. Accessed December 2004.
13. Vale L, Wyness L, McCormack K, McKenzie L, Brazzelli M, Stearns SC. A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty for treatment of hip disease. Health Technol Assess. 2002; 6(15):1-109. (Pubitemid 34763929)
14. Palmer SJ, Wimhurst JA, Villar RN. Does hip resurfacing really conserve bone? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001; 83:(suppl I):S70.
15. Pollard T, Basu C, Ainsworth R, Lai W, Bannister G. Is the Birmingham hip resurfacing worthwhile? Hip International. 2003; 13(1):25-28.
16. De Smet KA, Pattyn C, Verdonk R. Early results of primary birmingham hip resurfacing using a hybrid metal-on-metal couple. Hip International. 2002; 12(2):158-162. (Pubitemid 35363510)
17. Roder C, Parvizi J, Eggli S, Berry DJ, Muller ME, Busato A. Demographic factors affecting long-term outcome of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; (417):62-73 (Pubitemid 37499511)
18. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969; 51(4):737-755.
19. D'Antonio JA, Capello WN, Manley MT, Feinberg J. Hydroxyapatite coated implants: total hip arthroplasty in the young patient and patients with avascular necrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997; (344):124-138. (Pubitemid 27490643)
20. Wagner H. Surface replacement arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978; (134):102-130. (Pubitemid 9047593)
21. Howie DW, Campbell D, McGee M, et al. Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990; 72(5):708-714.
22. Amstutz HC, Graff-Radford A, Green T, Clarke IC. Tharies surface replacements. A review of the first 100 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978; (134):87-101.
23. Head WC. Wagner surface replacement arthroplasty of the hip. Analysis of fourteen failures in forty-one hips. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981; 63(3):420-427. (Pubitemid 11154152)
24. Chirodan N, Saw T, Villar R. Results of hybrid total hip replacement and resurfacing. Is there a difference? Hip International. 2004; 14(2):169-173.
25. Yuan L, Shih C. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1999; 119(5-6):263-266. (Pubitemid 29408394)