Dragline deposition patterns among male and female Hogna helluo (Araneae, Lycosidae) in the presence of chemical cues from prey

Journal of Arachnology

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 97-100

  Holler, Rebecca L ^a   Persons, Matthew H ^a  

^a SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anti predator; Crickets; Draglines; Kairomone; Wolf spider

Indexed keywords

ACHETA DOMESTICUS; ARANEAE; GRYLLIDAE; HOGNA HELLUO; LYCOSIDAE;

EID: 65349089035     PISSN: 01618202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1636/ST08-37.1     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Allan, R.A., M.A. Elgar & R.J. Capon. 1996. Exploitation of an ant chemical alarm signal by the zodariid spider Habronestes bradleyi Walckenaer. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 263:69-73.
2. Barnes, M.C., M.H. Persons & A.L. Rypstra. 2002. The effect of predator chemical cue age on antipredator behavior in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 15:26-281.
3. Bell, R., A.L. Rypstra & M.H. Persons. 2006. The effect of predator hunger on chemically-mediated antipredator responses and survival in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina. Ethology 112:903-910.
4. Blatchley, W.S. 1920. Orthoptera of Northeastern America with Especial Reference to the Faunas of Indiana and Florida. The Nature Publishing Company, Indianapolis, Indiana. 784 pp.
5. Clark, R.J., R.R. Jackson & J.R. Waas. 1999. Draglines and assessment of fighting ability in cannibalistic jumping spiders. Journal of Insect Behavior 12:753-766.
6. Dijkstra, H. 1976. Searching behaviour and tactochemical orientation in males of the wolf spider Pardosa amentata (CI.) (Araneae, Lycosidae). Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie Van Wetenschappen-Amsterdam. Series C 79:235-244.
7. Eiben, B.J. & M.H. Persons. 2007. The effect of prior exposure to predator cues on chemically-mediated defensive behavior and survival in the wolf spider Rabidosa rabida (Araneae: Lycosidae). Behaviour 144:889-906.
8. Gaskett, A.C. 2007. Spider sex pheromones: emission, reception, structures, and functions. Biological Reviews 82:27-48.
9. Ghouri, A.S.K. 1961. Home and distribution of the house cricket Acheta domesticus L. Nature 192:1000.
10. Hlivko, J.T. & A.L. Rypstra. 2003. Spiders reduce herbivory: nonlethal effects of spiders on the consumption of soybean leaves by beetle pests. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 96:914-919.
11. Huber, B.A. 2005. Sexual selection research on spiders: progress and biases. Biological Reviews 80:363-385.
12. Kortet, R. & A. Hedrick. 2004. Detection of the spider predator, Hololena nedra by naïve juvenile field crickets (Gryllus integer) using indirect cues. Behaviour 141:1189-1196.
13. Lehmann, L., S.E. Walker & M.H. Persons. 2004. The influence of predator sex on chemically-mediated antipredator response in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae). Ethology 110:1-17.
14. Morse, D.H. 2008. Excretion behavior of adult female crab spiders Misumena vatia. (Araneae, Thomisidae). Journal of Arachnology 36:612-614.
15. Persons, M.H. & A.L. Rypstra. 2000. Preference for chemical cues associated with recent prey in the wolf spider Hogna helluo (Araneae: Lycosidae). Ethology 106:27-35.
16. Persons, M.H. & G.W. Uetz. 1996. Wolf spiders vary patch residence time in the presence of chemical cues from prey (Araneae, Lycosidae). Journal of Arachnology 24:7-79.
17. Persons, M.H., S.E. Walker, A.L. Rypstra & S.D. Marshall. 2001. Wolf spider predator avoidance tactics and survival in the presence of diet-associated predator cues (Araneae: Lycosidae). Animal Behaviour 61:43-51.
18. Punzo, F. & O. Kukoyi. 1997. The effects of prey chemical cues on patch residence time in the wolf spider, Trochosa parthenus (Chamberlin) (Lycosidae) and the lynx spider, Oxyopes salticus (Oxyopidae). Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society 10:323-326.
19. Punzo, F. & C. Preshkar. 2002. Environmental chemical cues associated with prey and subsequent prey preference in the wolf spider Hogna carolinesis Hentz (Araneae, Lycosidae). Journal of Environmental Biology 23:341-345.
20. Roberts, J.A. & G.W. Uetz. 2005. Discrimination of female reproductive state from chemical cues in silk by males of the wolf spider, Schizocosa ocreata (Araneae, Lycosidae). Animal Behaviour 70:217-223.
21. Rypstra, A.L., C. Wieg, S.E. Walker & M.H. Persons. 2003. Mutual mate assessment in wolf spiders: differences in the cues used by males and females. Ethology 109:315-325.
22. Roland, C. 1984. Chemical signals bound to the silk in spider communication (Arachnida, Araneae). Journal of Arachnology 11:309-314.
23. Schulz, S. 2004. Semiochemistry of spiders. Pp. 110-143. In Advances in Insect Chemical Ecology. (R.T. Carde & J.G. Millar, eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
24. Walker, S.E. & A.L. Rypstra. 2001. Sexual dimorphism in functional response and trophic morphology in Rabidosa rabida (Araneae: Lycosidae). American Midland Naturalist 146:161-170.
25. Walker, S.E. & A.L. Rypstra. 2002. Sexual dimorphism in feeding behavior and trophic morphology in wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 80:679-688.