The effect of prior exposure to predator cues on chemically-mediated defensive behavior and survival in the wolf spider Rabidosa rabida (Araneae: Lycosidae)

Behaviour

Volumn 144, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 889-906

  Eiben, Ben ^a   Persons, Matthew ^a  

^a SUSQUEHANNA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Antipredator; Chemical cue; Learning; Lycosid; Multi modal; Predator recognition

Indexed keywords

ACHETA DOMESTICUS; ARANEAE; BOERHAVIA; LYCOSIDAE; PARDOSA; PARDOSA MILVINA; RABIDOSA; RABIDOSA RABIDA;

EID: 34547949971     PISSN: 00057959     EISSN: 1568539X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156853907781492681     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Barnes, M.C., Persons, M.H. & Rypstra, A.L. (2002). The effect of predator chemical cue age on antipredator behavior in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae). - J. Insect Behav. 15: 269-281.
2. Blumstein, D.T., Mari, M., Daniel, J.C, Ardron, J.G., Griffin, A.S. & Evans, C.S. (2002). Olfactory predator recognition: wallabies have to learn to be wary. - Anim. Conserv. 5: 87-93.
3. Brown, G.E. & Godin, J.-G. (1999). Who dares, learns: Chemical inspection behaviour and acquired predator recognition in a characin fish. - Anim. Behav. 57: 475-481.
4. Brown, G.E., Paige, J.A. & Godin, J.-G. (2000). Chemically mediated predator inspection behavior in the absence of predator visual cues by a characin fish. - Anim. Behav. 60: 315-321.
5. Chivers, D.P. & Smith, R.J.F. (1995). Free-living fathead minnows rapidly learn to recognize pike as predators. - J. Fish Biol. 46: 949-954.
6. Chivers, D.P, Wisenden, B.D. & Smith, R.J.F. (1996). Damselfly larvae learn to recognize predators from chemical cues in the predator's diet. - Anim. Behav. 52: 315-320.
7. Chivers, D.P., Mirza, R.S. & Johnston, J. (2002). Learned recognition of heterospecific alarm cues enhances survival during encounters with predators. - Behaviour 139: 929-938.
8. Clark, R.J. & Jackson, R.R. (2000). Chemical cues from ants influence predatory behavior in Habrocestum pulex, an ant-eating jumping spider (Araneae, Salticidae). - J. Arachnol. 28: 309-318.
9. Cox, D.R. & Oakes, D. (1984). Analysis of Survival Data. - Chapman & Hall, London.
10. Craig, C.L. (1994). Limits to learning: effects of predator pattern and colour on perception and avoidance-learning by prey. - Anim. Behav. 47: 1087-1099.
11. Darwish, T.L., Mirza, R.S., LeDuc, A.O.H.C & Brown, G.E. (2005). Acquired recognition of novel predator odour cocktails by juvenile glowlight tetras. - Anim. Behav. 70: 83-89.
12. Downes, S. & Shine, R. (1998). Sedentary snakes and gullible geckos: predator-prey coevolution in nocturnal rock-dwelling reptiles. - Anim. Behav. 55: 1373-1385.
13. Garcia, J., Hankins, W.G. & Rusiniak, K.W. (1974). Behavioral regulation of the milieu interne in man and rat. - Science 185: 824-831.
14. Giles, N. (1984). Development of the overhead fright response in wild and predator-naïve three-spined sticklbacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus L. - Anim. Behav. 37: 908-911.
15. Godfray, H.C.J. (1994). Parasitoids: behavioral and evolutionary ecology. - Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
16. Hallander, H. (1970). Prey, cannibalism and .microhabitat selection in the wolf spider Pardosa chelata O. F. Müller and P pullata Clerck. - Oikos 21: 337-340.
17. Hawkins, L.A., Magurran, A.E. & Armstrong, J.D. (2004). Innate predator recognition in newly-hatched Atlantic salmon. - Behaviour 141: 1249-1262.
18. Hebets, E.A. (2003). Subadult experience influences adult mate choice in an arthropod: exposed female wolf spiders prefer males of a familiar phenotype. - Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 11390-11395.
19. Hebets, E.A. & Uetz, G.W. (1999). Female responses to isolated signals from mutlimodal male courtship displays in the wolf spider genus Schizocosa (Araneae: Lycosidae). - Anim. Behav. 57: 865-872.
20. Higashi, G.A. & Rovner, J.S. (1975). Post-emergent behaviour of juvenile lycosid spiders. - Bull. Br. Arach. Soc. 3: 113-119.
21. Hoefler, C., Taylor, M. & Jakob, E.M. (2002). The role of chemical cues in the foraging behavior of salticids. - J. Arachnol. 30: 155-158.
22. Kats, L.B. & Dill, L.M. (1998). The scent of death: chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals. - Ecoscience 5: 361-394.
23. Lehmann, L.M., Walker, S.E. & Persons, M.H. (2004). The influence of predator sex on chemically mediated antipredator response in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae). - Ethology 110: 323-339.
24. van Lenteren, J.C. & Bakker, K. (1975). Discrimination between parasitised and unparasitised hosts in the parasitic wasp Pseudocoila bochei: a matter of learning. - Nature 254: 417-419.
25. Lizotte, R.S. & Rovner, J.S. (1988). Nocturnal capture of fireflies by lycosid spiders: visual versus vibratory stimuli. - Anim. Behav. 36: 1809-1815.
26. Magurran, A.E. (1990). The inheritance and development of minnow antipredator behavior. - Anim. Behav. 39: 834-842.
27. Marshall, S.D. & Rypstra, A.L. (1999a). Spider competition in structurally simple ecosysterns. - J. Arachnol. 27: 343-350.
28. Marshall, S.D. & Rypstra, A.L. (1999b). Patterns in the distribution of two wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) in two soybean agroecosystems. - Environ. Entomol. 28: 1052-1059.
29. Mathis, A. & Vincent, F. (2000). Differential use of visual and chemical cues in predator recognition and threat-sensitive predator-avoidance responses by larval newts (Notophtalmus viridescens). - Can. J. Zool. 78: 1646-1652.
30. McClintock, W.J. & Uetz, G.W. (1996). Female choice and pre-existing bias: visual cues during courtship in two Schizocosa wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). - Anim. Behav. 52: 167-181.
31. Mirza, R.S. & Chivers, D.P. (2000). Predator-recognition training enhances survival of brook trout: evidence from laboratory and field-enclosure studies. - Can. J. Zool. 78: 2198-2208.
32. Morse, D.H. (2000). Flower choice by naïve crab spiders and the effect of subsequent experience. - Anim. Behav. 59: 943-951.
33. Papaj, D.R. & Prokopy, R.J. (1989). Ecological and evolutionary aspects of learning in phytophagous insects. - Annu. Rev. Entomol. 34: 315-350.
34. Papaj, D.R. & Vet, L.E.M. (1990). Odor learning and foraging success in the parasitoid, Leptopilina heterotoma. - J. Chem. Ecol. 16: 3137-3150.
35. Persons, M.H. (1999). Hunger effects on the foraging responses to perceptual cues in immature and adult wolf spiders (Lycosidae). - Anim. Behav. 57: 81-88.
36. Persons, M.H. & Lynam, E.C (2004). Pardosa milvina (Araneae, Lycosidae) spiderling dispersal in the presence of conspecific and heterospecific lycosid silk and excreta. - J. Arachnol. 32: 341-344.
37. Persons, M.H. & Rypstra, A.L. (2000). Preference for chemical cues associated with recent prey in the wolf spider Hogna helluo (Araneae: Lycosidae). - Ethology 106: 27-35.
38. Persons, M.H. & Uetz, G.W. (1996a). The influence of sensory information on patch residence time in wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). - Anim. Behav. 51: 1285-1293.
39. Persons, M.H. & Uetz, G.W. (1996b). Wolf spiders vary patch residence time in the presence of chemical cues from prey (Araneae, Lycosidae). - J. Arachnol. 24: 76-79.
40. Persons, M.H. & Uetz, G.W. (1997). The effects of prey attack and movement on the patch residence decision rules of Schizocosa ocreata (Araneae: Lycosidae). - J. Insect Behav. 10: 737-751.
41. Persons, M.H. & Uetz, G.W. (1999). Age and sex-based differences in the foraging decisions of wolf spiders. - J. Insect Behav. 12: 723-736.
42. Persons, M.H., Walker, S.E. & Rypstra, A.L. (2002). Fitness costs and benefits of chemically-mediated antipredator behavior in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina. - Behav. Ecol. 13: 386-392.
43. Persons, M.H., Walker, S.E., Rypstra, A.L. & Marshall, S.D. (2001). Wolf spider predator avoidance tactics and survival in the presence of diet-associated predator cues (Araneae: Lycosidae). - Anim. Behav. 61: 43-51.
44. Punzo, F. (1997). Leg autotomy and avoidance behaviour in response to a predator in the wolf spider, Schizocosa avida (Araneae, Lycosidae). - J. Arachnol. 25: 202-205.
45. Punzo, F. (2000). An experimental analysis of maze learning in the wolf spider, Trochosa parthenus (Araneae: Lycosidae). - Florida Scientist. 63: 155-159.
46. Punzo, F. & Kukoyi, O. (1997). The effects of prey chemical cues on patch residence time in the wolf spider, Trochosa parthenus (Chamberlin) (Lycosidae) and the lynx spider, Oxyopes salticus (Oxyopidae). - Bull. Br. Arachnol. Soc. 10: 323-326.
47. Rice, W.R. (1989). Analyzing tables of statistical tests. - Evolution 43: 223-225.
48. Richert, S.E. & Hedrick, A. V. (1990). Levels of predation and genetically based anti-predator behaviour in the spider, Agelenopsis aperta. - Anim. Behav. 40: 679-687.
49. Rovner, J.S. (1967). Acoustic communication in a lycosid spider (Lycosa rabida Walckenaer). - Anim. Behav. 15: 273-281.
50. Rovner, J.S. (1996). Conspecific interactions in the lycosid Rabidosa rabida: the roles of different senses. - J. Arachnol. 24: 16-23.
51. SAS Institute (2002). JMP Statistics and Graphics Guide. - SAS Institute, Cary, NC
52. Scheffer, S.J., Uetz, G.W. & Stratton, G.E. (1996). Sexual selection, male morphology, and the efficacy of courtship signalling in two wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 38: 17-23.
53. Stauffer, H.-P. & Semlitsch, R.D. (1993). Effects of visual, chemical and tactile cues offish on the behavioural responses of tadpoles. - Anim. Behav. 46: 355-364.
54. Suboski, M.D. (1990). Releaser-induced recognition learning. - Psychol. Rev. 97: 271-284.
55. Taylor, A.R., Persons, M.H. & Rypstra, A.L. (2005). The effect of perceived predation risk on male courtship and copulatory behavior in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae, Lycosidae). - J. Arachnol. 33: 76-81.
56. Terry, M.G. & Hirsch, J. (1997). The problem of measuring associative learning in Drosophila melanogaster with proper procedures to control for nonassociative effects. - In: Comparative Psychology of Invertebrates: The Field and Laboratory Study of Insect Behavior (Greenberg, G. & Tobach, E., eds). Garland, New York, NY, p. 223-244.
57. Turlings, T.C.J., Wackers, F.L., Vet, L.E.M., Lewis, W.J. & Tumlinson, J.H. (1992). Learning of host-location cuesby hymenopterous parasitoids. - In: Insect Learing: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives (Lewis, A.C. & Papaj, D.R., eds). Chapman & Hall, New York, NY, p. 51-78.
58. Turlings, T.C.J., Tumlinson, J.H., Lewis, W.J. & Vet, L.E.M. (1989). Beneficial arthropod behavior mediated by airborne semiochemicals. VIII. Learning of host related odors induced by a brief contact experience with host by-products in Cotesia marginiventris (Cresson), a generalist larval parasitoid. - J. Insect. Behav. 2: 217-225.
59. Veen, T., Richardson, D.S., Blaakmeer, K. & Komdeur, J. (2000). Experimental evidence for innate predator recognition in the Seychelles warbler. - Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 267: 2253-2258.
60. Wcislo, W.T. & Schatz, B. (2003). Predator recognition and evasive behavior by sweat bees, Lasioglossum umbripenne (Hymenoptera: Halictidae), in response to predation by ants, Ectatomma ruidum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 53: 182-189.
61. Wildy, E.L. & Blaustein, A.R. (2001). Learned recognition of intraspecific predators in larval long-toed salamanders Ambystoma macrodactylum. - Ethology 107: 479-494.
62. Wise, D.H. & Wagner, J.D. (1992). Exploitative competition for prey among young stages of the wolf spider Schizocosa ocreata. - Oecologia 91: 7-13.
63. Wisenden, B.D., Chivers, D.P. & Smith, R.J.F. (1997). Learned recognition of predation risk by Enallagma damselfly larvae (Odonata, zygophtera) on the basis of chemical cues. - J. Chem. Ecol. 23: 137-151.
64. Wisenden, B.D. & Millard, M.C. (2001). Aquatic flatworms use chemical cues from injured conspecifics to assess predation risk and to associate risk with novel cues. - Anim. Behav. 62: 761-766.