The maze task: Measuring forced incremental sentence processing time

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 163-171

  Forster, Kenneth I ^a   Guerrera, Christine ^a   Elliot, Lisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

COGNITION; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 65349087845     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.1.163     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
2. Dopkins, S., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1992). Lexical ambiguity and eye fixations in reading: A test of competing models of lexical ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory & Language, 31, 461-476.
3. Forster, K. I. (1981). Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical contexts on naming time: Evidence for autonomous lexical processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 465-495.
4. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116-124.
5. Freedman, S. E., & Forster, K. I. (1985). The psychological status of overgenerated sentences. Cognition, 19, 101-131.
6. Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1-76.
7. Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228-238.
8. King, J., & Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 580-602.
9. Mitchell, D. C. (1987). Lexical guidance in human parsing: Locus and processing characteristics. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 601-681). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Mitchell, D. C. (2004). On-line methods in language processing: Introduction and historical review. In M. Carrieras & C. Clifton (Eds.), The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eye-tracking, ERP and beyond (pp. 15-32). London: Routledge.
11. Nicol, J. L., Forster, K. I., & Vereš, C. (1997). Subject-verb agreement processes in comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language, 36, 569-587.
12. Rayner, K., Liversedge, S. P., & White, S. J. (2006). Reading and disappearing text: Cognitive control of eye movements. Vision Research, 46, 310-323.
13. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125-157.
14. Schilling, H. E. H., Rayner, K., & Chumbley, J. I. (1998). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1270-1281.
15. Schuberth, R. E., & Eimas, P. D. (1977). Effects of context on the classification of words and nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 27-36.
16. Traxler, M. J., Morris, R. K., & Seely, R. E. (2002). Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory & Language, 47, 69-90.
17. Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1990). Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Memory & Cognition, 18, 380-393.
18. Wanner, E., & Maratsos, M. (1978). An ATN approach to comprehension. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan, & G. Miller (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp. 119-161). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Waters, G. S., Caplan, D., & Hildebrandt, N. (1987). Working memory and written sentence comprehension. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 531-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.