Teachers' knowledge development and change: Untangling beliefs and practices

Literacy Research and Instruction

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 65-75

  Theriot, Shirley ^a   Tice, Kathleen C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescent literacy; Teacher education

Indexed keywords

EID: 65249183153     PISSN: 19388071     EISSN: 19388063     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19388070802226287     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Atwell, N. (1998). In the middle: New Understanding about writing, reading, and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
2. Calkins, L. M. (1983). Lessons from a child. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
3. Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers' thought processes. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook on research on teaching (pp. 255-296). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
4. Cochran-Smith, M., & Fries, K. (2005). Researching teacher education in changing times: Politics and paradigms. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education (pp. 69-109). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Davis, M. M., Konopak, B. C., & Readance, J. E. (1993). An investigation of two chapter 1 teachers' beliefs about reading and instructional practices. Reading Research and Instruction, 33(2), 105-118.
6. Graves, D. H. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
7. Grossman, P. L. (1992). Why models matter: An alternate view on professional growth in teaching. Review of Educational Research, 62, 171-179.
8. Hall, L. (2005). Teachers and content area reading: Attitudes, beliefs, and change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(4), 403-414.
9. Harste, J., & Burke, C. (1977). A new hypothesis for reading teacher research: Both the teaching and learning of reading are theoretically based. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Reading: Theory and practice. Twenty-sixth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 32-40). Clemson, SC: National Reading conference.
10. Hollingsworth, S. (1989). Prior beliefs and cognitive change in learning to teach. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 160-189.
11. Kinzer, C. K. (1988). Instructional frameworks and instructional choices: Comparisons between preservice and inservice teachers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 20, 357-377.
12. Leu, D. J., & Kinzer, C. K. (1995). Effective reading instruction in the elementary grades. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
13. Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 6, 307-332.
15. Richardson, V., Anders, P., Tidwell, D., & Lloyd, C. (1991). The relationship between teachers' beliefs and practices in reading comprehension instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 2, 559-586.
16. Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435-454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Stieglitz, E. (1983). Effects of a content area reading course on teacher attitudes and practices: A four-year study. Journal of Reading, 26, 690-696.
18. Wedman, J., & Robinson, R. (1988). Effects of extended in-service on secondary teachers' use of content reading instructional strategies. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 21(3), 65-70.
19. Wilson, E., Konopak, B., & Readance, J. E. (1991). Examining content area reading beliefs, decisions and instruction: A case of an English teacher. In C. Kinzer & D. Leu (Eds.), Literacy research, theory, and practice: Views from many perspectives. Forty-first yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 475-482). Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.
20. Wolf, S. A., Carey, A. A., & Mieras, E. I. (1996). "What is this literachurch stuff anyway?": Preservice teachers' growth in understanding children's literary response. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 130-157.