Early treatment for Class II malocclusion and perceived improvements in facial profile

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 135, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 580-585

  O'Brien, Kevin ^a   Macfarlane, Tatiana ^a   Wright, Jean ^a   Conboy, Frances ^a   Appelbe, Priscilla ^a   Birnie, David ^a   Chadwick, Stephen ^a   Connolly, Ivan ^a   Hammond, Mark ^a   Harradine, Nigel ^a   Lewis, David ^a   Littlewood, Simon ^a   McDade, Catherine ^a   Mitchell, Laura ^a   Murray, Alison ^a   O'Neill, Julian ^a   Sandler, Jonathan ^a   Read, Micheal ^a   Robinson, Stephen ^a   Shaw, Iain ^a   Turbill, Elizabeth ^a   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTITION; FACE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PEER GROUP; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF CONCEPT; STATISTICAL MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CHILD; DENTITION, MIXED; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL; ORTHODONTICS, INTERCEPTIVE; PEER GROUP; SELF CONCEPT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 65249152463     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.020     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. O'Neill K., Harkness M., and Knight R. Ratings of profile attractiveness after functional appliance treatments. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118 (2000) 371-376
2. Frude N., Kenealy P., and Shaw W.C. Influence of children's physical attractiveness on teacher expectations. J Soc Psychol 128 (1988) 373-383
3. Kenealy P., Frude N., and Shaw W.C. Teacher expectations as predictors of academic. J Soc Psychol 131 (1991) 305-306
4. Donner A., and Eliasziw M. Sample size requirements for reliability studies. Stat Med 6 (1987) 441-448
5. O'Brien K., Wright J., Conboy F., Sanjie Y., Mandall N., Chadwick S., et al. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124 (2003) 234-243
6. Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 82 (1982) 104-113
7. Shrout P.E., and Fleiss J.L. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86 (1979) 420-428
8. Landis J.R., and Koch G.C. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33 (1977) 159-174
9. Tulloch J.F.C., Phillips C., and Proffit W.R. Benefits of early Class II treatment: progress report of a two-phased randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113 (1998) 62-72
10. Keeling S.D., Wheeler T.T., King G.J., Garvan C.W., Cohen D.A., Cabassa S., et al. Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113 (1998) 40-50
11. Ghafari J., Shofer F.S., Jacobsen-Hunt U., Markowitz D.L., and Laster L.L. Headgear versus functional regulator in the early treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113 (1998) 51-61
12. O'Brien K., Wright J., Conboy F., Chadwick S., Connolly I., Cook P., et al. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 2: psychosocial effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124 (2003) 488-495
13. Phillips C., Griffin T., and Bennett E. Perception of facial attractiveness by patients, peers and professionals. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 10 (1995) 127-135
14. Dongieux J., and Sassouni V. The contribution of mandibular positioned variation to facial esthetics. Angle Orthod 50 (1980) 334-339
15. Howells D.J., and Shaw W.C. The validity and reliability of ratings of dental and facial attractiveness for epidemiologic use. Am J Orthod 88 (1985) 402-408
16. Kerr W.J.S., and O'Donnell J.M. Panel perception of facial attractiveness. Br J Orthod 17 (1990) 299-304
17. Foster E.J. Profile preferences among diversified groups. Angle Orthod 43 (1973) 34-40
18. Cochrane S.M., Cunningham S.J., and Hunt N.P. A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 14 (1999) 291-295
19. Barrer J.G., and Ghafari J. Silhouette profiles in assessment of facial aesthetics: a comparison of cases treated with various orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod 87 (1985) 385-391
20. Johnston D.J., Hunt O., Johnston C.D., Burden D.J., Stevenson M., and Hepper P. The influence of lower facial vertical proportion in facial attractiveness. Eur J Orthod 25 (2005) 349-354