Toxicity testing of human assited reproduction devices using the mouse embryo assay

Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 529-535

  Punt van der Zalm, J P E M ^a   Hendriks, J C M ^a   Westphal, J R ^a   Kremer, J A M ^a   Teerenstra, S ^a   Wetzels, A M M ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Blastocyst development; Human assisted reproduction; Mouse embryo assay; Toxicity

Indexed keywords

TOXIC SUBSTANCE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BATCH PROCESS; BLASTOCYST; CBA MOUSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURE MEDIUM; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HYBRID CELL; INFERTILITY THERAPY; MOUSE; MOUSE EMBRYO; MOUSE EMBRYO ASSAY; NONHUMAN; REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; TOXICITY TESTING;

EID: 65249112156     PISSN: 14726483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60130-7     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bavister BD, Andrews JC 1988 A rapid sperm motility bioassay procedure for quality-control testing of water and culture media. Journal of in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer 5, 67-75.
2. Bertheussen K, Holst N, Forsdahl F et al. 1989 A new cell culture assay for quality control in IVF. Human Reproduction 4, 531-535.
3. Claassens OE, Wehr JB, Harrison KL 2000 Optimizing sensitivity of the human sperm motility assay for embryo toxicity testing. Human Reproduction 15, 1586-1591.
4. Davidson A, Vermesh M, Lobo RA et al. 1988 Mouse embryo culture as quality control for human in vitro fertilization: the one-cell versus the two-cell model. Fertility and Sterility 49, 516-521.
5. Dumoulin JC, Menheere PP, Evers JL et al. 1991 The effects of endotoxins on gametes and preimplantation embryos cultured in vitro. Human Reproduction 6, 730-734.
6. Fleetham JA, Pattinson HA, Mortimer D 1993 The mouse embryo culture system: improving the sensitivity for use as a quality control assay for human in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility 59, 192-196.
7. Food and Drug Administration 1998 Obstetric and gynecologic devices; reclassification and classification of medical devices used for in vitro fertilization and related assisted reproduction procedures. Federal Register 63, 48428-48437.
8. Gardner DK, Reed L, Linck D et al. 2005 Quality control in human in vitro fertilization. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine 23, 319-324.
9. Hendriks JC, Teerenstra S, Punt Van der Zalm JP et al. 2005 Sample size calculations for a split-cluster, beta-binomial design in the assessment of toxicity. Statistics in Medicine 24, 3757-3772.
10. Kruger TF, Stander FS 1984 'n Vergelykende studie tussen tweesel-embrio's van CBA- en 1-muise in 'n menslike in vitro bevrugtingsprogram. [A comparative study of two-cell embryos of CBA and F1 mice in a human in vitro fertilization program.] South African Medical Journal 65, 209-210.
11. Lierman S, De Sutter P, Dhont M et al. 2007 Double-quality control reveals high-level toxicity in gloves used for operator protection in assisted reproductive technology. Fertility and Sterility 88, 1266-1272.
12. Montoro L, Subias E, Young P et al. 1990 Detection of endotoxin in human in vitro fertilization by the zona-free mouse embryo assay. Fertility and Sterility 54, 109-112.
13. Naaktgeboren N 1987 Quality control of culture media for in vitro fertilisation. Annales de Biologie Clinique (Paris) 45, 368-372.
14. Scott LF, Sundaram SG, Smith S 1993 The relevance and use of mouse embryo bioassays for quality control in an assisted reproductive technology program. Fertility and Sterility 60, 559-568.
15. Van den Bergh M, Baszo I, Biramane J et al. 1996 Quality control in IVF with mouse bioassays: a four years' experience. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 13, 733-738.