Sample size calculations for a split-cluster, beta-binomial design in the assessment of toxicity

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 24, Issue 24, 2005, Pages 3757-3772

  Hendriks, J C M ^a   Teerenstra, S ^a   Punt Van der Zalm, J P E ^a   Wetzels, A M M ^a   Westphal, J R ^a   Borm, G F ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Beta binomial model; Clustered binary data; Litter effect; Sample size; Split cluster design; Toxicity

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYOTOXICITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; LINEAR SYSTEM; MOUSE; MOUSE STRAIN; NONHUMAN; PROBABILITY; SAMPLE SIZE; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TOXICITY TESTING; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ANIMALS; BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; EMBRYO; FEMALE; FERMENTATION; MICE; MICE, INBRED CBA; MODELS, STATISTICAL; SAMPLE SIZE; TOXICITY TESTS;

EID: 30944456489     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.2412     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Guidance for industry. Devices used for in vitro fertilization and related assisted reproduction procedures. Food and Drug Administration, August 11, 1998.
2. Donner A, Klar N, Zou G. Methods for statistical analysis of binary data in split-cluster designs. Biometrics 2004; 60:919-925. DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00247.x
3. Pan WP. Sample size and power calculations with correlated binary data. Controlled Clinical Trials 2001; 22:211-227.
4. Donner A, Birkett N, Buck C. Randomization by cluster: sample size requirements and analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology 1981; 114:906-914.
5. Haseman JK, Kupper LL. Analysis of dichotomous response data from certain toxicological experiments. Biometrics 1979; 35:281-293.
6. Williams DA. The analysis of binary responses from toxicological experiments involving reproduction and teratogenicity. Biometrics 1975; 31:949-952.
7. Paul SR. Analysis of proportions of affected foetuses in teratological experiments. Biometrics 1982; 38:361-370.
8. Bowman D. Effect of correlation in modeling clustered binary data. Journal of Statistical Computing and Simulations 2001; 69:369-389.
9. Altham PME. Discrete variable analysis for individuals grouped into families. Biometrika 1976; 63:263-269.
10. Cohen JE. The distribution of the chi-square statistic under clustered sampling from contingency tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1976; 71:665-670.
11. Kupper LL, Haseman JK. The use of a correlated binomial model for the analysis of certain toxicological experiments. Biometrics 1978; 34:69-76.
12. Altham PME. Two generalizations of the binomial distribution. Applied Statistics 1978; 27:162-167.
13. Kuk AYC. A litter-based approach to risk assessment in developmental toxicity studies via a power family of completely monotone functions. Applied Statistics 2004; 53:369-386. DOI: 10.1046/j.1467-9876.2003.05369.x
14. Bieler GS, Williams RL. Cluster sampling techniques in quantal response teratology and developmental toxicity studies. Biometrics 1995; 51:764-776.
15. Liu G, Liang K-Y. Sample size calculations for studies with correlated observations. Biometrics 1997; 53:937-947.
16. Jung S-H, Kang S-H, Ahn C. Sample size calculations for clustered binary data. Statistics in Medicine 2001; 20:1971-1982. DOI:10.1002/sim.846
17. Lee EW, Dubin N. Estimation and sample size considerations for clustered binary responses. Statistics in Medicine 1994; 13:1241-1252.