Prepublication review of medical ethics research: Cause for concern

Academic Medicine

Volumn 84, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 495-497

  Landy, David C ^a   Coverdale, John H ^b   McCullough, Laurence B ^b   Sharp, Richard R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; EDITOR; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; TRAINING; HUMAN; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRE;

EDITORIAL POLICIES; ETHICS, MEDICAL; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 65249101231     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819a8bf4     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Jefferson T, Wager E, Davidoff F. Measuring the quality of editorial peer review. JAMA. 2002;287:2786-2790. (Pubitemid 34591963)
2. Jefferson T, Alderson P, Wager E, Davidoff F. Effects of editorial peer review: A systematic review. JAMA. 2002;287:2784-2786. (Pubitemid 34591962)
3. Schulman K, Sulmasy DP, Roney D. Ethics, economics, and the publication policies of major medical journals. JAMA. 1994;272:154-156.
4. Borry P, Schotsmans P, Dierickx K. Empirical research in bioethical journals. A quantitative analysis. J Med Ethics. 2006;32:240-245.
5. Weller AC. Editorial peer review: Methodology and data collection. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1990; 78:258-270. (Pubitemid 20251845)
6. McCullough LB, Coverdale JH, Chervenak FA. Argument-based medical ethics: A formal tool for critically appraising the normative medical ethics literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191:1097-1102.
7. Eckles RE, Meslin EM, Gaffney M, Helft PR. Medical ethics education: Where are we? Where should we be going? A review. Acad Med. 2005;80:1143-1152. (Pubitemid 44366115)