Modeling visual search on a rough surface

Journal of Vision

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2009, Pages

  Clarke, Alasdair D F ^a   Chantler, Mike J ^a   Green, Patrick R ^a  

^a HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Linear nonlinear linear model; Texture; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL; VISION;

FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 64949186019     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/9.4.11     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bergen, J. R., & Landy, M. S. (1991). Computational modelling of visual texture segregation. Computational Models of Visual Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Bovik, A. C., Clark, M., & Geisler, W. S. (1990). Multichannel texture analysis using localised spatial filters. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 12, 55-73.
3. Cave, K. R., & Wolfe, J. M. (1990). Modelling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 225-271.
4. Chantler, M. J. (1995). Why illuminant direction is fundamental to texture analysis. IEE Proceedings Vision, Image and Signal Processing, 142, 199-206.
5. Chantler, M. J., Petrou, M., Penirschke, A., Schmidt, M., & McGunnigle, G. (2005). Classifying surface texture while simultaneously estimating illumination. International Journal of Computer Vision (VISI), 62, 83-96.
6. β continuous textured background. Vision Research, 48, 2193-2203.
7. Gao, D., Mahadevan, V., & Vasconcelos, N. (2008). On the plausibility for the discriminant center-surround hypothesis for visual saliency. Journal of Vision, 8(7):13, 1-18, http://journalofvision.org/8/ 7/13/, doi:10.1167/8.7.13.
8. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489-1506.
9. Landy, M. S., & Oruç, I. (2002). Properties of second-order spatial frequency channels. Vision Research, 42, 2311-2329. Liu, Y., Collins, R. T., & Tsin, Y. (2004). A computational model for periodic pattern perception based on frieze and wallpaper groups. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 26, 354-371.
10. Liu, Y., Lin, W. C., & Hays, J. (2004). Near-regular texture analysis and manipulation. ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH), 23, 368-376.
11. Malik, J., & Perona, P. (1990). Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and Image Science, 7, 923-932.
12. Morrone, M. C., & Burr, D. C. (1988). Feature detection in human vision: A phase-dependent energy model. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Science, 235, 221-245.
13. Najemnik, J., & Geisler, W. S. (2008). Eye movement statistics in humans are consistent with an optimal search strategy. Journal of Vision, 8(3):4, 1-14, http://journalofvision.org/8/3/4/, doi:10.1167/8.3.4.
14. Navalpakkam, V., & Itti, L. (2007). Search goal tunes visual features optimally. Neuron, 53, 605-617.
15. Neider, M. B., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2006). Searching for camouflaged targets: Effects of target-background similarity on visual search. Vision Research, 46, 2217-2235.
16. β noise surfaces. Vision Research, 48, 1791-1797
17. Peters, R. J., Iyer, A., Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2005). Components of bottom-up gaze allocation in natural images. Vision Research, 45, 2397-2416.
18. Pomplun, M. (2006). Saccadic selectivity in complex visual search displays. Vision Research, 46, 1886-1900.
19. Pomplun, M., Reingold, E. M., Shen, J., & Williams, D. E. (2000). The area activation model of saccadic selectivity in visual search. In L. R. Gleitman & A. K. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 375-380). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Pomplun, M., Shen, J., & Reingold, E. M. (2003). Area activation: A computational model of saccadic selectivity in visual search. Cognitive Science, 27, 299-312.
21. Randen, T., & Husoy, J. H. (1999). Filtering for texture classification: A comparative study. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21, 291-310.
22. Rao, P. N., Zelinsky, G. J., Hayhoe, M. M., & Ballard, D. H. (2002). Eye movements in iconic visual search. Vision Research, 42, 1447-1463.
23. Rutishauser, U., & Koch, C. (2007). Probabilistic modeling of eye movement data during conjunction search via feature-based attention. Journal of Vision, 7(6):5, 1-20, http://journalofvision.org/7/6/ 5/, doi:10.1167/7.6.5.
24. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202-238.
25. Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention. London UK: University College London Press.
26. Wolfe, J. M., & Gancarz, G. (1996). Guided search 3.0. In V. Lakshminarayanan (Ed.), Basic clinical applications of vision science (pp. 189-192). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
27. Wolfe, J. M., Oliva, A., Horowitz, T. S., Butcher, S. J., & Bompas, A. (2002). Segmentation of objects from backgrounds in visual search tasks. Vision Research, 42, 2985-3004.
28. Zelinsky, G. J., Rao, R. P. N., Hayhoe, M. M., & Ballard, D. H. (1997). Eye movements reveal the spatiotemporal dynamics of visual search. Psychological Science, 8, 448-453.