Prediction of 30-day mortality after endovascular repair or open surgery in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

Journal of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1093-1099

  Visser, Jacob J ^a   Williams, Martine ^c   Kievit, Jur ^d   Bosch, Johanna L ^a,b  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d CATHARINA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTICOAGULANT AGENT; ANTITHROMBOCYTIC AGENT; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; HYDROXYMETHYLGLUTARYL COENZYME A REDUCTASE INHIBITOR;

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; AGED; AORTA RUPTURE; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; GLASGOW ANEURYSM SCORE; HUMAN; KIDNEY FAILURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MORTALITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; MYOCARDIAL DISEASE; OPEN SURGERY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SCORING SYSTEM; SHOCK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VALIDATION STUDY;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC RUPTURE; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; BOSTON; CEREBROVASCULAR DISORDERS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HEART DISEASES; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; NETHERLANDS; ODDS RATIO; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; ROC CURVE; SHOCK; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 64949183913     PISSN: 07415214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.12.027     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Samy A.K., Murray G., and MacBain G. Glasgow aneurysm score. Cardiovasc Surg 2 (1994) 41-44
2. Leo E., Biancari F., Nesi F., Pogany G., Bartolucci R., De Pasquale F., et al. Risk-scoring methods in predicting the immediate outcome after emergency open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Am J Surg 192 (2006) 19-23
3. Korhonen S.J., Ylönen K., Biancari F., Heikkinen M., Salenius J.P., Lepäntalo M., and Finnvasc Study Group. Glasgow Aneurysm Score as a predictor of immediate outcome after surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 91 (2004) 1449-1452
4. Tambyraja A.L., Fraser S.C., Murie J.A., and Chalmers R.T. Validity of the Glasgow Aneurysm Score and the Hardman Index in predicting outcome after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 92 (2005) 570-573
5. Tambyraja A.L., Lee A.J., Murie J.A., and Chalmers R.T. Prognostic scoring in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a prospective evaluation. J Vasc Surg 47 (2008) 282-286
6. Yusuf S.W., Whitaker S.C., Chuter T.A., Wenham P.W., and Hopkinson B.R. Emergency endovascular repair of leaking aortic aneurysm. Lancet 344 (1994) 1645
7. Visser J.J., van Sambeek M.R., Hamza T.H., Hunink M.G., and Bosch J.L. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: endovascular repair versus open surgery-systematic review. Radiology 245 (2007) 122-129
8. Franks S., Lloyd G., Fishwick G., Bown M., and Sayers R. Endovascular treatment of ruptured and symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 31 (2006) 345-350
9. Larzon T., Lindgren R., and Norgren L. Endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a shift of the paradigm?. J Endovasc Ther 12 (2005) 548-555
10. Castelli P., Caronno R., Piffaretti G., Tozzi M., Laganà D., Carrafiello G., et al. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: endovascular treatment. Abdom Imaging 30 (2005) 263-269
11. Alsac J.M., Desgranges P., Kobeiter H., and Becquemin J.P. Emergency endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: feasibility and comparison of early results with conventional open repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 30 (2005) 632-639
12. Hinchliffe R.J., Bruijstens L., MacSweeney S.T., and Braithwaite B.D. A randomised trial of endovascular and open surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm - results of a pilot study and lessons learned for future studies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 32 (2006) 506-513 discussion 514-5.
13. Peppelenbosch N., Geelkerken R.H., Soong C., Cao P., Steinmetz O.K., Teijink J.A., et al. Endograft treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms using the Talent aortouniiliac system: an international multicenter study. J Vasc Surg 43 (2006) 1111-1123 discussion 1123.
14. Visser J.J., Bosch J.L., Hunink M.G., van Dijk L.C., Hendriks J.M., Poldermans D., and van Sambeek M.R. Endovascular repair versus open surgery in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: clinical outcomes with 1-year follow-up. J Vasc Surg 44 (2006) 1148-1155
15. Bohm N., Wales L., Dunckley M., Morgan R., Loftus I., and Thompson M. Objective risk-scoring systems for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: applicability in endovascular repair?. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 36 (2008) 172-177
16. Baas A.F., Janssen K.J., Prinssen M., Buskens E., and Blankensteijn J.D. The Glasgow Aneurysm Score as a tool to predict 30-day and 2-year mortality in the patients from the Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management trial. J Vasc Surg 47 (2008) 277-281
17. Tang T.Y., Walsh S.R., Fanshawe T.R., Seppi V., Sadat U., Hayes P.D., et al. Comparison of risk-scoring methods in predicting the immediate outcome after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 34 (2007) 505-513
18. Hirzalla O., Emous M., Ubbink D.T., and Legemate D. External validation of the Glasgow Aneurysm Score to predict outcome in elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 44 (2006) 712-716 discussion 717.
19. Faizer R., DeRose G., Lawlor D.K., Harris K.A., and Forbes T.L. Objective scoring systems of medical risk: a clinical tool for selecting patients for open or endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 45 (2007) 1102-1108
20. Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects. http://www.ccmo-online.nl/ Accessed: February 10, 2006.
21. van der Heijden G.J., Donders A.R., Stijnen T., and Moons K.G. Imputation of missing values is superior to complete case analysis and the missing-indicator method in multivariable diagnostic research: a clinical example. J Clin Epidemiol 59 (2006) 1102-1109
22. Steyerberg E.W., Borsboom G.J., van Houwelingen H.C., Eijkemans M.J., and Habbema J.D. Validation and updating of predictive logistic regression models: a study on sample size and shrinkage. Stat Med 23 (2004) 2567-2586
23. Harrell F. Regression Modeling Strategies: with Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis (2001), Springer, New York
24. Lloyd G.M., Bown M.J., Norwood M.G., Deb R., Fishwick G., Bell P.R., and Sayers R.D. Feasibility of preoperative computer tomography in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a time-to-death study in patients without operation. J Vasc Surg 39 (2004) 788-791
25. Hordijk-Trion M., Lenzen M., Wijns W., de Jaegere P., Simoons M.L., Scholte op Reimer W.J., et al. Patients enrolled in coronary intervention trials are not representative of patients in clinical practice: results from the Euro Heart Survey on Coronary Revascularization. Eur Heart J 27 (2006) 671-678
26. Lloyd-Williams F., Mair F., Shiels C., Hanratty B., Goldstein P., Beaton S., et al. Why are patients in clinical trials of heart failure not like those we see in everyday practice?. J Clin Epidemiol 56 (2003) 1157-1162