Bridging cultural policy and media policy

Journal of Arts Management Law and Society

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 311-332

  Napoli, Philip M ^a  

^a FORDHAM UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cultural policy; Entertainment; Media policy; News; Policy principles

Indexed keywords

EID: 64949110741     PISSN: 10632921     EISSN: 19307799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/JAML.47.4.311-332     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Albro, R. 2005. Managing culture at diversity’s expense? Thoughts on UNESCO’s newest cultural policy instrument. Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 35 (3): 247-53.
2. Associated Press v. United States, 326 U.S. 1 (1945).
3. Baeker, G. 2002. Sharpening the lens: Recent research on cultural policy, cultural diversity, and social cohesion. Canadian Journal of Communication 27:179-96.
4. Baker, C. E. 2001. Media, markets, and democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Baker, C. E. 2007. Media concentration and democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Barber, B. 1998. A place for us: How to make civil society and democracy strong. New York: Hill and Wang.
7. Barnett, C. 2001. Culture, policy, and subsidiarity in the European Union: From symbolic identity to the governmentalisation of culture. Political Geography 20:405-26.
8. Barron, J. A. 1967. Access to the press-a new First Amendment right. Harvard Law Review 80:1641-78.
9. Baum, M. A. 2005. Soft news goes to war: Public opinion and American foreign policy in the new media age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10. Bawden, A. 2002. Access and the cultural infrastructure. Issue paper prepared for the Center for Arts and Culture, Washington, DC, http://www.culturalpolicy.org/pdf/access.pdf (accessed March 13, 2008).
11. Belfiore, E. 2004. Auditing culture: The subsidised cultural sector in the New Public Management. International Journal of Cultural Policy 10 (2): 183-202.
12. Benkler, Y. 2006. The wealth of networks. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13. Bennett, T. 2000. Cultural policy beyond aesthetics. Working paper, Cultural Policy Center, University of Chicago.
14. Bennett, T. 2001. Differing diversities: Cultural policy and cultural diversity. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
15. Bennett, T., and C. Mercer. 1996. Improving research and international cooperation for cultural policy. Paper prepared for UNESCO on behalf of the Australian Key Centre for Cultural and Media Policy, http://www.ericarts.org/web/files/86/en/bennet-mercer.pdf (accessed March 13, 2008).
16. Bonetti, S., and C. Madden. 1996. Harmony, aesthetics and anaesthesia: Utilising a broad definition of cultural economics. Cultural Policy 2 (2): 255-68.
17. Bradford, G., M. Gary, and G. Wallach, eds. 2000. The politics of culture: Policy perspectives for individuals, institutions, and communities. New York: New Press.
18. Braman, S. 1990. Trade and information policy. Media, Culture and Society 12: 361-85.
19. Braman, S. 2004. Where has media policy gone? Defining the field in the twenty-first century. Communication Law and Policy 9 (2): 153-82.
20. Burgelman, J.-C., and C. Pauwels. 1992. Audiovisual policy and cultural identity in small European states: The challenge of a unified market. Media, Culture and Society 14: 169-83.
21. Center for Arts and Culture. 2001. America’s cultural capital: Recommendations for structuring the federal role. Washington, DC: Author.
22. Chaffee, S., and S. Frank. 1997. Learning about politics from the mass media. Political Communication 14:421-30.
23. Chen, K. H. 1992. Voices from outside: Towards a new internationalist localism. Cultural Studies 6 (3): 476-84.
24. Clark, J. 2004, August 24. Political realities: Documentaries rush in to fill journalism void. In These Times. http://www.inthesetimes.com/site/main/article/1003 (accessed August 28, 2006).
25. Cooper, M., ed. 2007. The case against media consolidation. New York: Donald McGannon Communication Research Center.
26. Coppens, T., and F. Saeys. 2006. Enforcing performance: New approaches to govern public service broadcasting. Media, Culture and Society 28 (2): 261-84.
27. Cowling, P. 2005. An earthly enigma: The role of localism in the political, cultural and economic dimensions of media ownership regulation. Hastings Communication and Entertainment Law Journal 27:257-357.
28. Dayton-Johnson, J. 2002. The economics of cultural policy in the Internet age. Canadian Journal of Communication 27:447-52.
29. DiMaggio, P. 1983a. Can culture survive the marketplace? Journal of Arts Management and Law 13 (1): 61-87.
30. DiMaggio, P. 1983b. Cultural policy studies: What they are and why we need them. Journal of Arts Management and Law 13 (1): 241-48.
31. Entman, R. M., and S. S. Wildman. 1992. Reconciling economic and non-economic perspectives on media policy: Transcending the “marketplace of ideas.” Journal of Communication 41 (1): 5-19.
32. Federal Communications Commission. 2003. 2002 Biennial Regulatory Review, Report and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd. 13620.
33. Federal Communications Commission. 2004. Broadcast localism. Notice of Inquiry, 19 FCC Rcd. 12425.
34. Federal Communications Commission. 2007. In the matter of violent television programming and its impact on children. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-07-50A1.pdf (accessed May 19, 2007).
35. Feigenbaum, H. 2004. Is technology the enemy of culture? International Journal of Cultural Policy 10 (3): 252-63.
36. Fowler, M. S., and D. L. Brenner. 1982. A marketplace approach to broadcast regulation. Texas Law Review 60: 1-51.
37. Garnham, N. 2005. From cultural to creative industries: An analysis of the implications of the “creative industries” approach to arts and media policy making in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Cultural Policy 11 (1): 15-29.
38. Girard, A. 1981. A commentary: Policy and the arts-The forgotten cultural industries. Journal of Cultural Economics 5 (1): 61-68.
39. Gray, C. 1996. Comparing cultural policy: A reformulation. Cultural Policy 2 (2): 213-22.
40. Harrison, J., and L. Woods. 2001. Television quotas: Protecting European culture? Entertainment Law Review 12 (1): 5-14.
41. Hesmondhalgh, D. 2005. Media and cultural policy as public policy: The case of the British labour government. International Journal of Cultural Policy 11 (1): 95-109.
42. Horwood, J. N. 1995. Public, educational, and governmental access on cable television: A model to assure reasonable access to the information superhighway for all people in fulfillment of the First Amendment guarantee of free speech. Seton Hall Law Review 25:1413-45.
43. Kammen, M. 2000. Culture and the state in America. In Bradford, Gary, and Wallach 2000, 114-40.
44. Koch, C. 1998. The contest for American culture: A leadership case study on the NEA and NEH funding crisis. Public Talk: The Online Journal of Discourse Leadership. http://www.upenn.edu/pnc/ptkoch.html (accessed August 28, 2006).
45. Konz, K. A. 2005. Review of alleged actions violating the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967, as amended: Report of the Office of Inspector General, Corporation for Public Broadcasting. http://www.cpb.org/oig/602_cps_ig_reportofreview.pdf (accessed August 28, 2006).
46. Kurin, R. 2000. The new study and curation of culture. In Bradford, Gary, and Wallach 2000, 338-56.
47. Ledbetter, J. 1998. Made possible by: The death of public broadcasting in the United States. New York: Verso.
48. Lewis, J. 2000. Designing cultural policy. In Bradford, Gary, and Wallach 2000, 79-93.
49. Louie, J., and A. Luckey. 2006. Democracy, social justice and media reform: A baseline study of the emerging field of media policy. Report prepared for Grantmakers in Film & Electronic Media, http://www.fex.org/assets/202_mediapolicysurveyreportfi.pdf (accessed March 13, 2008).
50. McDonald, K. M. 1999. How would you like your television: With or without borders and with or without culture? A new approach to media regulation in the European Union. Fordham International Law Journal 22:1991-2023.
51. McIntyre, G. 2004. Political documentaries. Hollywood Reporter http://www.hollywoodreporter. com/thr/film/feature_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000554567(accessed August 28, 2006).
52. Mercer, C. 1994. Cultural policy: Research and the governmental imperative. Media Information Australia 73:16-22.
53. Miller, T., and G. Yudice. 2002. Cultural policy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
54. Minow, N. N. 1978. Address by Newton N. Minow to the National Association of Broadcasters, Washington, DC. In Documents of American broadcasting, 4th ed., ed. F. Kahn, 207-17. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
55. Mueller, M. 1995. Why communications policy is passing “mass communication” by: Political economy as the missing link. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 12 (4): 457-72.
56. Mulcahy, K. 1991. The public interest in public culture. Journal of Arts Management and Law 21 (1): 9-23.
57. Mulcahy, K. 2006. Cultural policy: Definitions and theoretical approaches. Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 35 (4): 319-30.
58. Napoli, P. M. 2001. Foundations of communications policy: Principles and process in the regulation of electronic media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
59. Napoli, P. M. 2002. Access and fundamental principles in communication policy. Law Review of Michigan State University, no. 3: 797-812.
60. Napoli, P. M., and S. Sybblis. 2007. Access to audiences as a FirstAmendment right: Its relevance and i mpli cations for electronic media policy. Virginia Journal of Law and 'Technology 12(1). http://www.vjolt.net/vol12/issue1/v12i1_a1-NAPoLI.pdf(accessed March 13, 2008).
61. Nielsen, H. K. 2003. Cultural policy and evaluation of quality. International Journal of Cultural Policy 9 (3): 237-45.
62. Ogrodnik, L. 2000. Patterns in culture consumption and participation. Ottawa: Cultural Statistics Program, Statistics Canada.
63. O’Loughlin, B. 2006. The operationalization of the concept of cultural diversity in British television policy and governance. Working Paper 27, Center for Research on Socio-Cultural Change, Oxford.
64. O’Regan, T., and B. Goldsmith. 2006. Making cultural policy: Meeting cultural objectives in a digital environment. Television and New Media 7 (1): 68-91.
65. Ouellette, L., and J. Lewis. 2000. Moving beyond the “vast wasteland”: Cultural policy and tele-vision in the United States. Television and New Media 1 (1): 95-115.
66. Peterson, R. A. 2005. Changing arts audiences: Capitalizing on omnivorousness. Paper presented at the Cultural Policy Center, Chicago.
67. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 2004. Perceptions of partisan bias seen as growing-especially by Democrats. Cable and Internet loom large in fragmented political universe. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center for the People and the Press.
68. Pratt, A. C. 2005. Cultural industries and public policy: An oxymoron? International Journal of Cultural Policy 11 (1): 31-44.
69. Pratten, S. 1998. Needs and wants: The case of broadcasting policy. Media, Culture and Society 20:381-407.
70. Rothfield, L. 1999. Cultural policy studies?! Cultural/policy studies?! Cultural policy studies?! A guide for perplexed humanists. Working paper, Cultural Policy Center, University of Chicago.
71. Rushton, M. 2003. Cultural diversity and public funding for the arts: A view from cultural eco-nomics. Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 33 (2): 85-97.
72. Schlesinger, P. 1997. From cultural defence to political culture: Media, politics and collective identity in the European Union. Media, Culture and Society 19:369-91.
73. Schuster, J. M. 2002. Informing cultural policy. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
74. Smith, J. A. 2000. Preface. In Bradford, Gary, and Wallach 2000, ix-xi.
75. Stucke, M. E., and A. P. Grunes. 2001. Antitrust and the marketplace of ideas. Antitrust Law Journal 69: 249-302.
76. Suoranta, J. 2003. A world divided in two: Digital divide, information, and communication technolo-gies, and the “youth question.” Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies 1(2). http://www.jceps.com/index.php?pageID=article&articleID=16 (accessed August 28, 2006).
77. Tepper, S. J. 2004. Notes on localism. Arts Industries Policy Forum, Curb Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville.
78. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. 1995. Our creative diversity. http://www.unesco.org/culture/policies/ocd/index.shtml (accessed March 13, 2008).
79. Urice, J. K. 1983. Using research to determine, challenge, or validate public arts policy. Journal of Arts Management and Law 13 (1): 198-206.
80. Vaidhyanathan, S. 2005. Remote control: The rise of electronic cultural policy. Annals of the American Academy 597:122-33.
81. Venturelli, S. 2001. From the information economy to the creative economy: Moving culture to the center of international public policy. Working paper, Center for Arts and Culture. http://www.culturalpolicy.org/pdf/venturelli.pdf (accessed on June 20, 2006).
82. Volkerling, M. 1996. Deconstructing the difference-engine: A theory of cultural policy. Cultural Policy 2 (2): 189-212.
83. Wallach, G. 2000. Introduction. In Bradford, Gary, and Wallach 2000, 1-10.
84. Wyszomirski, M. J. 1995. Policy communities and policy influence: Securing a government role in cultural policy for the twenty-first century. Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 25 (3): 192-204.
85. Young, D. G., and R. M. Tissinger. 2006. Dispelling late-night myths: News consumption among late-night comedy viewers and the predictors of exposure to various late-night shows. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 11 (3): 113-34.