A stimulus-locked vector autoregressive model for slow event-related fMRI designs

NeuroImage

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 739-748

  Thompson, Wesley K ^a   Siegle, Greg ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMYGDALOID NUCLEUS; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; DISEASE SEVERITY; EMOTION; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VECTOR AUTOREGRESSIVE MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DEPRESSION; EMOTIONS; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 64949084203     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.011     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aertson A., and Preissl H. Non Linear Dynamics and Neuronal Networks (1991), VCH Publishers, New York 281-302 chapter Dynamics of activity and connectivity in physiological neuronal networks
2. Amaral D., Price J., Pitkanen A., and Carmichael S. The Amygdala: Neurobiological Aspects of Emotion, Memory, and Mental Dysfunction (1992), Wilely-Liss, New York 1-66 chapter Anatomical organization of the primate amygdaloid complex
3. Anand A., Li Y., Wang Y., Wu J., Gao S., Bukhari L., Matthews V., Kalnin A., and Lowe M. Activity and connectivity of brain mood regulating circuit in depression: a functional magnetic resonance study. Biol. Psychiatry 57 (2005) 1079-1088
4. Bhattacharya S., Ringo Ho M.-H., and Purkayastha S. A Bayesian approach to modeling dynamic effective connectivity with fMRI data. NeuroImage 30 (2006) 794-812
5. Bollen K.A. Structural Equations With Latent Variables (1989), Wiley, New York 1989
6. Bullmore E., Horwitz B., Honey G., Brammer M., Williams S., and Sharma T. How good is good enough in path analysis of fMRI data?. NeuroImage 11 (2000) 289-301
7. Crainiceanu C., Ruppert D., and Wand M. Bayesian analysis for penalized spline regression using winbugs. J. Stat. Softw. 14 (2005)
8. Davidson R., Jackson D., and Kalin N. Emotion, plasticity, context, and regulation: perspectives from affective neuroscience. Psychol. Bull. 126 (2000) 890-909
9. de Pasquale F., Del Gratta C., and Romani G. Empirical Markov Chain Monte Carlo Bayesian analysis of fMRI data. NeuroImage 42 (2008) 99-111
10. Eichler M. A graphical approach for evaluating effective connectivity in neural systems. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 360 (2005) 953-967
11. Friston K. Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: a synthesis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2 (1994) 56-78
12. Friston K. Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: a synthesis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2 (1994) 56-78
13. Friston K., Harrison L., and Penny W. Dynamic causal modeling. NeuroImage 4 (2003) 1273-1302
14. Gelman A., Carlin J., Stern H., and Rubin D. Bayesian Data Analysis. Second Edition (2003), Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL
15. Ghashghaei H., and Barbas H. Pathways for emotion: interactions of prefrontal and anterior temporal pathways in the amygdala of the rhesus monkey. Neuroscience 115 (2002) 1261-1279
16. Glover G. Deconvolution of the impulse response in event-related bold fMRI. NeuroImage 9 (1999) 416-429
17. Goebel R., Roebroeck A., Kim D., and Formisano E. Investigating directed cortical interactions in time resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and granger causality. Magn. Reson. Imaging 21 (2003) 1251-1261
18. Granger C.W.J. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37 3 (1969) 424-438
19. Harrison L., Penny W., and Firston K. Multivariate autoregressive modeling of fMRI time series. NeuroImage 4 (2003) 1477-1491
20. Horwitz B. The elusive concept of brain connectivity. NeuroImage 19 (2003) 466-470
21. Kass R., and Natarajan R. A default conjugate prior for variance components in generalized linear mixed models. (comment on article by Browne and Draper). Bayesian Anal. 1 (2006) 535-542
22. LeDoux J. The Emotional Brain (1996), Simon and Shuster, New York
23. Mayberg H. Modulating dysfunctional limbic-cortical circuits in depression: towards development of brain-based algorithms for diagnosis and optimised treatment. Br. Med. Bull. 65 (2003) 193-207
24. Mayberg H., Liotti M., Brannan S., McGinnis S., Mahurin R., Jerabek P., Silva J., Tekell J., Martin C., Lancaster J., and Fox P. Reciprocal limbic cortical function and negative mood converging pet findings in depression and normal sadness. Am. J. Psychiatry 156 (1999) 675-682
25. McIntosh A., and Gonzalez-Lima F. Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2 (1994) 2-22
26. Mechelli A., Penny W., Price C., Gitelman D., and Friston K. Effective connectivity and inter-subject variability: using a multi-subject network to test differences and commonalities. NeuroImage 17 (2002) 1459-1469
27. Metcalfe J., and Mischel W. A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: dynamics of willpower. Psychol. Rev. 106 (1999) 3-19
28. Moore H., and Grace A. Differential effect of tonic and phasic activation of the basolateral amygdala on prefrontal cortical input to nucleus accumbens neurons. Soc. Neurosci. Abst. 385 (2000) 8
29. Nolen-Hoeksema S., Morrow J., and Frederickson B. Response styles and the duration of episodes of depressed mood. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 102 (1993) 20-28
30. Papageorgiou C., and Wells A. Positive beliefs about depressive rumination: development and preliminary validation of a self-report scale. Behav. Ther. 32 (2001) 13-28
31. Penny W.M., Stephan K.E., Mechelli A., and Friston K.J. Comparing dynamic causal models. NeuroImage 22 3 (2004) 1157-1172
32. Phillips M.L., Travis M.J., Fagiolini A., and Kupfer D.J. Medication effects in neuroimaging studies of bipolar disorder. Am. J. Psychiatry 165 (2008) 313-320
33. Phillips M.L., Drevets W.C., Rauch S.L., and Lane R. Neurobiology of emotion perception II: implications for major psychiatric disorders. Biol. Psychiatry 54 5 (2003) 515-528
34. Piccard R., and Berk K. Data splitting. Am. Stat. 44 (1990) 140-147
35. Ringo Ho M.-H., Ombao H., and Shumway R. A state space approach to modelling brain dynamics. Stat. Sin. 15 (2005) 407-425
36. Roebroeck A., Formisano E., and Goebel R. Mapping directed influence over the brain using granger causality and fMRI. NeuroImage 25 (2005) 230-242
37. Ruppert D., Wand M.P., and Carroll R.J. Semiparametric Regression (2003), Cambridge University Press, 386 ISBN 0521785162, 9780521785167
38. Rykhlevskaia E., and Gratton G. Lagged covariance structure models for studying functional connectivity in the brain. NeuroImage 30 (2006) 1203-1218
39. Sato J., Edson A., Takahashi D., de Maria Felix M., Brammerc M., and Morettina P. A method to produce evolving functional connectivity maps during the course of an fMRI experiment using wavelet-based time-varying granger causality. NeuroImage 31 (2006) 187-196
40. Siegle G., Carter C., and Thase M. fMRI predicts recovery in cognitive behavior therapy for unipolar depression. Am. J. Psychiatry 163 (2006) 735-738
41. Siegle G., Steinhauer S., Thase M., and Carter C. Can't shake that feeling: fMRI assessment of sustained amygdala activity in response to emotional information in depressed individuals. Biol. Psychiatry 51 (2002) 693-707
42. Siegle G., Thompson W., Carter C., Steinhauer S., and Thase M. Increased amygdala and decreased prefrontal bold responses in depression: related and independent features. Biol. Psychiatry 61 (2007) 198-209
43. Thompson W., and Rosen O. A Bayesian model for sparse functional data. Biometrics 64 (2008) 54-63
44. Valdes-Sosa P., Sanchez-Bornot J., Lage-Castellanos A., Vega-Hernandez M., Bosh-Bayard J., Melie-Garcia L., and Canales-Rodriguez E. Estimating brain functional connectivity with sparse multivariate autoregression. Phil. Trans. R Soc. B 360 (2005) 969-981
45. Wagner A., Maril A., Bjork R., and Schacter D. Prefrontal contributions to executive control: fMRI evidence for functional distinctions within lateral prefrontal cortex. NeuroImage 14 (2001) 1337-1347
46. Wand M. Smoothing and mixed models. Comput. Stat. 18 (2003) 223-249
47. Wells A. Emotional Disorders and Metacognition: Innovative Cognitive Therapy (2000), Wiley, Chichester, UK
48. Wood S. Low-rank scale-invariant tensor product smooths for generalized additive mixed models. Biometrics 62 (2006) 1025-1036
49. Woods R., Mazziotta J., and Cherry S. Mri pet registration with automated algorithm. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 17 (1993) 536-546
50. Zhao Y., Staudenmayer J., Coull B., and Wand M.P. General design Bayesian generalized linear mixed models. Stat. Sci. 21 (2006) 35-51